Analyzing Performance Improvement Flashcards
data aggregation
pool data in 1 place, collect performance indicators, helps see big picture
benchmarking
comparison of data, common expectations/standards
internal benchmarking
org performance against itself over time, stricter
external benchmarking
compare one org to a group or org collecting data on the same measures in the same way- same scale
types of data
qualitative: nominal, ordinal
quantitative : discrete, continuous
nominal data
categorical data, values assigned to name specific category
ex: gender, inpt/outpt
bar/pie charts
ordinal data
ranked data
compare evaluation of various characteristics and value relative to each other
ex: pain scale, stages of disease
how respondents feel about issue
bar/pie charts
discrete data
numerical values represents whole numbers
ex: # of children in family
bar graphs
continuous data
assumes infinite number of possible values, decimal values
ex: weight, BP, temp
histogram
sampling
sufficient # of observations can be predictive of overall configuration of data
not efficient to collect every single occurrence - too frequent
ex:
30 pts pop –>use all cases
pop greater than 596 –> use 120 cases
key performance indicators
types of data most important for org, balanced look
clinical quality –> adverse events, mortality
financial viability –> net revenues, growth
customer loyalty –> staff loyalty, pt satisfaction
operational effectiveness –> staff efficiency, readmission rate,
data sources
MR, admin database, pt surveys, adverse drug rxn reports, incident reports, performance evaluations, infection surveillance, JC surveys
when data aggregated, what happens
data loses context and usefulness
ex: average of test is high, but there could be individuals issues overlooked
used as report card, won’t pinpoint what needs to be fixed
bundled data
overall report, lose context, begin to pinpoint issue
unbundled data
break down data to show the differences, and pinpoint where action needs to be