Advent of Europeans, growth of British empire, Socio-religious reform and Tribal-peasant movements Flashcards
advent of Portuguese: backgrnd?
- decline of roman empire in 7th cent-> Arab domination in Egypt and Persia
- easy accessibililty to Indian spices, silk, calicoes, silk and precious stones declined- due to monopolisation of red sea routes by arab
- 15th century Europe- renaissance+ great advances in ship-building+ eagerness for sea voyages+ econ dev due to expansion of land under cultivation, intro of an improved plough, scientific crop mgmt and increased supply of meat
- Portugese assumed leadership of in Christendom’s resistance against Islam and too the exploration spirit of genoese; idea of finding an ocean route to India became an obsesision of Prince Henry of Portugal(Navigator)
- 1497: under treaty of Tordesillas(1494), Portugal and Spain divided non-christian world betn them by an imaginary line in atlantic Ocean, 1300 miles west of Cape Verde
- 1487: Portugese navigator , Bartholomew dias, rounded the cape of good hope and sailed up eastern African coast
‘Navigator’: who? significance?
Prince Henry of Potugal; Pope Nicholas V gave him a bull in 1454, conferring on him the right to navigate ‘sea to distant shores of the Orient’….’as far as INdia’ to fight Islamic influence and spread christianity
Treaty of Tordesillas:
divided the newly discovered lands outside Europe between the Portuguese Empire and the Spanish Empire, along a meridian 1300 miles west of the Cape Verde islands
Arrival of vasco da gama?
- May 1948
- led by a Gujarati pilot abdul Majid
- accorded friendly reception by Zamorin, though arab traders there were apprehensive
advent of portugese changed rules of the game. how?
earlier many players, all wanted profit bt none wanted complete dominance, Portuguese wanted to monopolise the hugely profitable eastern trade by excluding competitors including arab.
Portuguese advent after vasco da Gama?
- Pedro Alvarez cabral-1500- to trade for spices, negotiating and establishing a factory at calicut; conflicts with Arabs; finally advantageous treaties with local rulers of cochin and Cannanore
- Vasco da gama in 1501- conflicts with arabs- Zamorin supported arabs- thus rupture with Zamorin- set up a trading factory at cannanore- thus, Calicut, cannanore and cochin became trade centres of Portuguese- also gradually fortified
- Francisco de almeida- 1505- appointed Guv by Portuguese king for a 3-yr term- aim to destroy Muslim trade by seizing Aden, Hormuz and malacca- came in conflict with and defeated by mamluk Sultan of Egypt (along wit GJ), off the coast of Diu in 1507- next yr though defeated both and launched ‘Blue Water policy’
- Alfonso de Albuqerque: succeded almeida as Guv- REAL founder of Portuguese power in east
- Nino-da-cunha- Guv in 1529
Alfonso de Albuqerque : significant points?
- succeded almeida as Guv-
- REAL founder of Portuguese power in east-
- estab bases at hormuz (overlooking Red sea), in Malabar and Malacca- introduced permit system-
- established control over major ship-building centres in the region-
- acquired Goa frm Bijapur Sultan in 1510 and thus GOA became the “first bit of Indian territory to be under the europeans since alexaner”-
- Abolition of Sati
- encouraged Portuguese men to take local wives and settle here
- Bitter persecution of Muslims
Portuguese men settling in India
- encouraged by Albuqerque
- established themselves as landlords in goa
- built new roads and irrigation works
- introduced new crops like tobacco andcashew nut or better plantation varieties of coconut; planted large groves of coconut to meet need for coir rigging and cordage
- settled as artisans and master ceaftsmen in Goa and cochin
- came to look this as their home rather than their homeland.
Nino-da-cunha?
- guv in 1529
- shifted hqrs frm Cochin to Goa
- 1534- Bahadur Shah of GJ- sought help in Fight with Mughal Humayun- ceded to Portuguese island of Bassein and promised them a base in Diu
- Bt relations with NBahadur Shah later soured and was killed by Portuguese
- attempted to increase in Bengal by setting many Portuguese nationals there with Hooghly as their hqrs
Favourable conditions for Portuguese in india?
- except GJ, ruled by powerful Mahmud Begarhs, northern part was divided among many small powers and in south bahamani kingdom was breaking up
- none of the powers had significant naval power
- In Far east, imperial decree of chinese emperor limited navigational reach of chinese ships
- Only possible sea rivals- Arabs din’t match Portuguese organisation and unity
- Portuguese had cannons on their ships.
importance of Portuguese state in India?
- tends to be under-estimated
- many coastal states within 50yrs of Vasco da Gama’s arrival eg. Goa;
- Mumbai to Daman and Diu to the approaches to GJ, they controlled a narrow tract with 4 important ports and hundreds of towns and villages;
- chain of seaport fortresses and trading posts like Mangalore, cannanore, Cochin and Calicut;
- military posts and settlements on the east coast at San Thome(chennai) and Nagapatam (Andhra).
- Towards end of 16th century, settlement at Hooghly
- role played in battles of powerbetn Vijaynagara and deccan sultans, betn daccanis and Mughals, betn Mughals and Marathas
- first to arrive and last to leave-1961
- religious policy: zeal to promote christianity and defeat Muslims; initially tolerant to Hindus bt later persecuted them too; sent Christian missionaries, Aquaviva and Monsearatte to Akbar in 1579 at Fatehpur Sikri. Again in 1595 , by Fathers Xavier and Pinheiro.
- Under the rule of jahangir, warmed up to him. 1608, 20 baptisms carried out in Agra with priests enjoying liberty.
- initiated European Era as well as marked emergence of naval power, after Cholas.
- aimed to gain monopoly in trade by the threat of or actual use of force- a blueprint followed by english later.
- military innovation in use of body armour, matchlock men and guns landed frm ships; led to the Mughals using field guns and artillery of the stirrups.
- an imp military contri was the system of drilling groups of infantry, on the Spanish model, introduced in 1630s as a counter to the Dutch pressure. This was later adopted by French, Englis, Marathas and Sikhs
- improved techniques at sea: multi-decked ships permitting carrying heavier armament, use of castled prow and stern to repel or launch boarding parties. Later both were adpated by Indian builders
- Portuguese skill at organisation- royal arsenals and dockyards, maintaining regular system of pilots. Mughals as well as other Europeans learnt frm them.
- Church were also teachers and patrons of the arts of paintor, carver and sculptor and music. Art of silversmith and goldsmith in Goa along with elaborate filigree work, fretted foliage work and metal work embedding jewels.
Decline of portuguese?
by 18th century, P lost commercial influence , though some carried trade in their individual capacity.
Factors-
- emergence of powerful dynasties in Egypt, Persia and North India as well as rise of Marathas (they captured Salsette and Bassein in 1739 frm P)
- religious policies of P like activities of Jesuits gave rise to political fear. Their antagonism for Muslim and conversion policy.
- Their dishonest trade practices also evoked strong reaction. earned notoriety as sea pirates eg. a similar act of plundering Mughal ships caused Jahangir to order Muqarrab Khan, then incharge of Surat to seek compensation.
- discovery of Brazil diverted colonising activities
- union of kingdoms of Spain and Portugal in 1580-81, dragging the smaller kingdoms into spain’s war with England and Holland, badly affected Portuguese monopoly of trade in India.
- Earlier monopoly of knowledge of sea route to India didn’t remain secret for long. the Dutch and the English had greater resources andmore compulsions to expand overseas.
Arrival of Dutch?
important Dutch factories in india?
main trading items?
- Cornelis de Houtman: reached Sumatra and Bantam in 1596
- 1602: formation of ‘EIC of Netherlands’
- it was also empowered to carry on war, conclude treaties and to take possession of territories
- first factory in India in Masulipatam (AP) in 1605
- captured nagapatam near madras frm the Portuguese and made it their main stronghold in S. India
- principal factories at Surat, Bimlipatam, Karaikal, chinsura, Baranagar, Kasimbazar, Balasore, Patna and Cochin
- main business
- redistributive or carrying trade: articles frm India, sell to East islands
- indigo manufacture in yamuna valley and Central india
- textiles (cotton) and silk frm bengal, GJ and Coromandel
- saltpetre frm Bihar
- opium and rice frm Ganga valley
Anglo-Dutch Rivalry?
- English were also coming near this time: commercial rivalry
- Massacre of English and Japanese at Amboyana (in Indonesia) by Dutch
- compromise in 1667: Britain withdrew its claims on Indonesia and the Dutch retired frm india, and instead monopolised trade in black pepper and spices
decline of Dutch in India: factors?
- mainly trade of Malay Archipelago
- Defeat of Dutch on the hands of British in the battle of Hooghly, 1759, dealt a crushing blow
- Dutch were nt much interested in Empire-building; their main concerns were trade, esp frm Spice islands of INdonesia
Beginnings of English voyage?
- As the knowldge of Portuguese profit spread
- On Dec 31st, 1600, Queen Elizabeth I granted exclusive trading rights to the company named ‘Guv and Company of Merchants of London trading into the East Indies’. initially a monopoly of 15 yrs, extended indefinitely in 1609
Progress of English in South and west?
- Captain hawkins arrived in court of Jehangir in 1609, bt mission to set up a factory in Surat didn’t succeed due to Portuguese influence in court
- In 1611, English started trading at Masulipatam and established a factory there in 1616 (first English factory in South)
- IN 1612, Capt Thomas Best defeated Portuguese in the sea off Surat; impressed Jahangir granted permission to set up factory at Surat in 1613.
- 1615: Sir Thomas Roe came as ambassador of james I to Jehangir’s court; successful in seeking permission to set up factories at Agra, Ahmedabad and Broach as well as succeded in obtaining 2 firmans confirming free trade with exemption frm inland tolls.
- 1632: Golden Farman issued to them by Sultan of Golconda to trade freely. plus received permission, frm ruler of Chandragiri in 1639, to build a fortified factory at Madras, which became Fort St. george and replaced Masulipatam as hqrs in South India.
- Bombay given to King Chrales II by Portugal as dowry in 1662, that was given to EIC on lease. Seat of western Presidency shifted frm Surat to Bombay in 1687. Thus tacit peace with Portuguese.
- 1667: deal with Dutch.
Progress of English in east and bengal?
- started factories at hariharpur (first English factory in east India) in Mahanadi delta and at Balasore in 1633
- 1651: Shah Shuja allowed them to trade freely for one time annual fee of rs 3K
- factories in Bengal were started at Hooghly (1651), Ksimbazar, patna and Rajmahal.
- English desire to fortify their factories led to hostilities and Hooghly was sacked by imperial Mughals in 1686 and they were forced to leave Hooghly.
- Job Charnock, a company agent, negotiated for a return to a place called Sutanuti in 1690 nd established a factory there nxt yr. And earlier system of free trade for 3000rs re-established. Also fortified factory at Sutanuti under pretext of threat frm Sobha Singh. The fortified settlement became Fort Williams in 1700.
- 1698, bought zamindari of 3 villages- Sutanuti, Gobindpur and Kalikata
- Farukhsayar’s farman in 1717
Formation of East India Company?
English revolution of 1688-> whigs opposed monopoly of EIC -> rival company formed -> UNder pressure frm Crown and Parliament, the two companies amalgamated in 1708 as ‘UNited company of Merchants of England trading to the East Indies’.
This was the EIC that ruled India.
Farrukhsayar’s Firman?
- secured by an English mission led by John Surman in 1717
- provisions of firman:
- bengal:
- no additinal custom duties on Comapny’s trade; jst the annual payment of 3000Rs
- Company permitted to issue dastaks fr such goods
- Company permitted to rent more land around Calcutta
- Hyderabad: retained privilege of freedom frm duties in trade and only had to pay the rent for Madras
- Surat: exempted frm all duties fr annual levy of 10000Rs
- Bombay: coind of Company minted at Bombay to hv currency throughout the Mughal empire
- bengal:
- These firmans were regarded as the magna carta of the company.
french power in India?
- Louis XIV, with his minister Colbert laid the foundation of French East India Company in 1664. It was granted a 50 yr monopoly for french trade in Indian and Pacific Oceans
- 1667: Francois Caron headed an expedition to India, setting up a factory at Surat.
- Another French factory at Masulipatam in 1669
- 1673: obtained permission frm Shaista Khan, Mughal Subehdar of bengal, to establish a township at Chandernagore near calcutta
- Pondicherry was founded in 1674 by Francois Martin, who replaced Francois caron as French guv
- Also established factories at Mahe, Karaikal, balasore and Qasim bazar
- Early setbacks : conflict with Dutch and later effects of Spanish war of succession in India that led to loss of Surat and Masulipatam
- reorganisation of french power in India after 1720 under Lenoir and Dumas.
Anglo-french Rivalry in india?
Began with outbreak of austrian war of succession and ended with conclusion of Seven years war, and played out in the form of the three Carnatic wars.
Carnatic wars: background?
- Carnatic was the name given to the Coromandal coast
- in 1740,
- Nizam Asaf Jah of Hyderabad old and battling Marathas
- south of his kingdom, no strong ruler, instead remnants of old Vijaynagara empire like Mysore, Cochin and Travancore.
First Carnatic war:
- yrs?
- immediate cause?
- result?
- importance/comments?
- 1740-48
- English navy seized some French ships; france seized Madras in 1746
- ended with Treaty of Aix-la Chapelle (1748) which brought austrian wars of succession to an end; madras was handed back to english and french got their territories in NA back
- famous battle of St. Thome (madras): revealed that an even a small disciplined European army (French) cud defeat a larger Indian army (forces of Anwar-ud-Din, Nawab of Carnatic)
Second Carnatic war
- yrs?
- immediate cause?
- result?
- comments/ significance?
- 1749-54
- death of Nizam ul Mulk in 1748-> accession of Nasir Jung (son) disputed by Muzaffar Jung (grandson) PLUS
- appointment of Anwar-ud-Din Khan as Nawab of Carnatic was resented by Chanda Sahib.
- French supported claims of Muzaffar Jung and Chanda sahib, while English sided with Nasir Jung and Anwar-ud-Din
- progress and result:
- Anwar ud Din killed in battle of Ambur; Muzaffar Jung becaem Subehdar of Deccan and Dupleix appointed Guv of all Mughal territories to the south of Krishna
- Bt later Clive’s tactics led to British victory and Chanda Sahib was killed and replaced by British supported Muhammad ali.
- annoyed at heavy fin losses coz of Dupleix’s policies, he was recalled.
- New Guv, Godeheu agreed with English nt to interfere in quarrels of native princes.
- Became evident that, countenance of Indian authority was no longer necessary for European success. Muhammad ali in carnatic and Salabat Jang in Hyderabad became clients rather than patrons.
Third carnatic war:
- yrs?
- immediate cause?
- results?
- comments/ significance?
- 1758-63
- two fold cause
- Seven Years war (1756-63) in Europe
- In 1758, french army under de Lally captured English forts of St. David and Vizianagaram.
- battle of wandiwash, won by English led by Generla Eyre Coote
- Ended french resistance in India. Though Treaty of paris (1763) restored the french factories, their political influence endedand British became sole European power in india
Causes of british Victory and French defeat?
- english company pvt enterprise; French company state initiative
- English navy was superior; cut off link betn French in India and France
- English had Bombay, Madras andCalcutta while french had only Pondicherry
- French subordinated their commercial interests to territorial ambition, which made french short of funds
- Superiority of Commanders in english camp: Sir Eyre Coote, Major Lawrence, Robert Clive vs only Dupleix on French side.
The Danes in India?
- Danish EIC estab in 1616
- 1620: founded a factory at Tranquebar near tanjore
- their principle settlement at Serampore near Calcutta
- beeter known for their missionary activities than for their commerce
Success of English while others failed in india coz?
- Str and nature of trading companies: Companies of french and Portugal largely owned by state and had feudalistic tendencies eg. in french company, monarch had 60% share and its directors nominted by him; lack of public interest in its success meant less accountablity
- Naval Superiority: British navy largest, most advanced of its times with victory against Spanish armada and against French at Trafalgar; English learnt imp of a strong navy frm the Portuguese
- Industrial revolution: reached other nation later frm England
- Military skill and discipline: British commanders good strategists; tech advancements etc, enabled small English troops to defeat larger armies
- Stable Govt: with exception of Glorious Revolution of 1688; while French had violent rev in 1789, Napoleeonic wars; dutch and Spain involoved in 80 yrs war in 17th century
- Lesser zeal for religion: thus more acceptable
- USe of debt mkt to fund its wars: Bank of England (world’s 1st Central bank) estab to sell govt debt to money mkts on promise of decent return when Britain shall defeat rival companies in france and Spain; france on the other hand went bankrupt.
Rulers after Aurangzeb- Part 1?
- Bahadur Shah I : 1709- March 1712
- eldest son of Aurnagzeb, Muazzam
- Khafi khan gave him the title of Shah-i-bekhabar
- adopted a pacific policy with Marathas, Rajputs and Jats. Shahu, the Maratha prince was released; Rajput chiefs were confirmed in their respective states
- took against Sikh leader Banda Bahadur
- Jahandar shah: march 1712-Feb 1713
- with the help of Zulfikar Khan
- introduced izara system to improve financial condition of empire
- abolished Jaziya
- Farrukhsiyar: 1713-1719
- with the help of ‘king makers’- Abdullah Khan and Hussain Ali
- policy of religious tolerance- abolished Jaziya and piligrimage tax
- gave farmans to british in 1717
- first Mughal ruler killed by his nobles: Sayyid brothers dethroned him with the help of Peshwa Balaji Vishwanath
- Rafi-ud-darjat: Feb-June 1719
- shortest stint
- Rafi-ud-Daula: June-Sept 1719
- placed by sayyid brothers; opium addict
Rulers after Aurangzeb- Part 2?
- Muhammad Shah: 1719-1748
- again with the help of Sayyyid bros;
- given the title of ‘Rangeela’ due to luxuriant lifestyle
- killed Sayyid brs with the help of Nizam ul Mulk
- witnessed rise of indep states like Hyd, bengal,Awadh and PJ
- 1724: Nizam ul Mulk became wazir and founded independent state of Hyd
- 1737: Baji Rao I invaded Delhi
- 1739: Nadir Shah defeated Mughals in battle of Karnal and annexed areas west of Indus into Persian empire
- Ahmad Shah: 1748-54
- left state of affairs in hands of Queen mother Udham bai, given the title of Qibla-e-Alam
- Alamgir II: 1754-58
- Ahmad Shah Abdali reached DElhi in Jan 1757
- Battle of PLassey
- Shah alam II: 1759-1806
- 3rd Battle of Panipat
- Battle of buxar: taken under British protection at allahabad; granted to British Diwani of bengal in perpetuity
- In 1772, Marathas took him to Delhi where he lived till 1803
- In 1803, again accepted British protection and herafter all Mughal rulers became pensioners of british after defeat of Daulat rao scindia by English
- Akbar II: 1806-37
- gave the title of Raja to Rammohan rai
- 1835: Coins bearing names of Mughal emperor stopped
- Bahadur Shah II: 1837-1857
- sent to rangoon after 1857
factors fr downfall of Mughals?
- Shifting Allegiance of Zamindars: rise of regional loyalties
- Jagirdari crisis: infighting and plotting
- Rise of regional aspirations
- economic and admin probs
- despotic governance system reqd a strong ruler at helm
- succession wars
- empire too vast and unwieldy to be managed by central rule under a weak rulr
- Failure of Aurangzeb’s Religious policy as well as deccan policy
- Invasion of Irani and Durrani kingdoms were death-blows
Rise of regional states afetr Mughals?
- Successor states
- didn’t challenge soverignty of Mughals
- eg. Awadh, bengal and Hyderbad
- Independent kingdoms:
- came into existence because of destabilisation of Mughal control over provinces
- eg. Mysore, Kerlaa and rajput states
- New states:
- set up by rebels against Mughals
- Marathas, Sikhs and Jats
Hyderabad kingdom?
founder of Asaf Jah house of Hyd was Kilich Khan, popularly known as Nizam ul Mulk; he defeated Mubariz Khan in battle of Shakr Kheda (1724)
Awadh kingdom?
- 1722
- Saadat Khan aka Burhan-ul-Mulk
- succeeded by Safdar Jung
Bengal kingdom?
- 1717
- Murshid Kuli khan
- succeeded by Shuja-ud-Din in 1722
- in 1740Alivardi Khan took over
Rajputs?
Bahadur Shah marched aagainst Ajit Singh in 1708 who had formed an alliance with Jai singh II and Durgadas rathor
Kerala?
martanda Verma
capital: Travancore
Kanyakumari to cochin
Jats?
- by Churaman and badan Singh
- capital: Bharatpir
- reached its zenith under Suraj Mal: Ganga in east to chambal in south and included subahs of Agra, Mathura, Meerut and Aligarh
- declined after death of suraj Mal in 1763
Sikhs?
- Banda Bahadur, assumed leadership of Sikhsin 1708, was defeated and killed
- again asserted their authority in wake of invasions by Nadir Shah and Ahmed Shah Abdali
- at this stage, they organised themselves into 12 misls
- emergence of Ranjit Singh: extended his cntrl frm Sutlej to Jhelum
Rohilakhand?
in farrukhabad region?
by Ali Muhammad Khan after nadir Shah’s invasion
Mohammad Khan bangash set up an indep kingdom in this area
British Conquest of Bengal:
- Exports frm Bengal toEurope?
- EIC commercial interests in Bengal?
- raw products such as
- saltpetre
- rice
- indigo
- pepper
- sugar
- silk
- cotton
- textiles
- handicrafts
- 60% of british imports frm Asia consisted of goods frm Bengal
- English factories at balasore, Hooghly, Kasimbazar, Patna and Dacca
- foundation of Calcutta by 1690s
- Company’s exports frm Bengal were worth 50000 Pounds which all was duty free by the royal firman on payment of just 350 pounds yearly
British Conquest of Bengal:
Alivardi Khan and english?
- came to power in 1740
- ruled fr 15 yrs
- on seeing British interference in Carnatic, he sought to expel Europeans frm bengal
- died in April 1756 and succeeded by Siraj ud daula
British Conquest of Bengal:
Siraj ud daula: his challenges?
- rival cousin: Shaukat Jang-the Nawab of Purnea: SuD defeated & killed him
- ahostile aunt: ghasiti begum: divested her of her treasure and secured her
- rebellious commander of army- Mir jafar: replaced him with Mir Madan
- court faction led by Jagat Seth, Omichand, Rai Ballabh, Rai Durlabh
- an alarmed subject (Hindu) pop: A Kashmiri officer Mohan lal was appointed as overall admin, acting as PM
British Conquest of bengal:
Siraj-ud-Daula and british: issues?
- rampant misuse of trade privileges
- fortified Calcutta without nawab’s permission
- gave asylum to a political fugitive, Krishna Das, son of Raj ballabh
- ‘Black hole tragedy’: 123/146 dead British
British Conquest of bengal:
Result of battle of Plassey?
- Mir jafar became Nawab-> in return gave the EIC large sums of money + zamindari of 24 parganas
- soverignty of EIC over Calcutta was recognised
- English posted a resident at Nawab’s court
British Conquest of bengal:
Treaty of 1760?
- Mir Jafar, failed to make payments due to the company, and entered into conspiracy with Dutch at chinsura
- Dutch defeated at Bedara in 1759
- In the fight fr nawabship of bengal that started after death of Miran (son of Mir Jaffer), Vansittart supported claims of Mir kasim, SIL of Mir Jaffer after a treaty betn EIC and Mir kasim
- cede districts of Burdwan, Mindnaporeand Chittagong to EIC
- Company wud get 1/2 of share in chunam trade in sylhet
- agreed to pay off outsndg payment due to EIC
- will pay 5 L towards company’s war efforts in S. India
- Enemies and friends of each others treated like own enemy
- tenents of Nawab’s territory nt to settle in company’s land and vice-versa
British Conquest of bengal:
Mir Kasim?
- Ablest after Alivardi Khan
- shifted capital frm Murshidabad to Munger
- reorganised bureaucracy with his men and restructured army
British Conquest of bengal:
Prelude to Battle of Buxar?
- Conflict of Mir Kasim with Ram Narayan, supported by EIC
- misuse of Company’s dastak
- coercive methods by english to get goods at a cheaper rate
- All this led to Mir Kasim abolishing duties altogether
- Led to outbreak of wars betn Mir Kasim and EIC in 1763 with English having victories
- MK fled to Awadh, and formed a confederacy with Shuja-ud-Daulah and Shah Alam II
British Conquest of bengal:
Battle of Buxar?
Oct 1764
British forced led by Major Hector Munro
British Conquest of bengal:
Battle of Buxar:
Treaties?
- Treaty with Mir Kasim:
- hand over Midnapore,Burdwan and Chittagong fr maintenance of army
- permitted duty free trade in Bengal except 2% duty on salt
- realpower laid in hands of naib-subahdar, who cud be appointed or dismissed by EIC
- Treaty of Allahabad- with nawab of Awadh
- surrendered Allahabad ad Kora to emp Shah alam II
- pay 50 L to EIC as war indemnity
- give Balwant Singh, Zamindar of Benares, full possession of his state
- Treaty of Allahabad- with Shah Alam II
- reside at Allahabad under Cmpany’s protection
- issued firman granting diwani of Bengal, Bihar and Odisha to EIC fr annual payment of 26 L
- annual 53 L payment to EIC in return fr Nizamat fns of said provinces
Dual Govt in Bengal?
- introduced by Robert Clive after Treaty of Allahbad
- both nizamat and diwani came under control of EIC; Company exercised Diwani rights as Diwan and nizamat rights thru his appointee, subahdar
- Company appointed Mohammed Raza Khan and Raja sitab Roy as deputy diwans fr bengal and Bihar respectively
- Mohammed Raza Khan also acted as deputy nazim or deputy subahdar
- nawab was responsible fr maintaining peace and order while both funds and forces lied with British
British Conquest of Mysore:
backgrnd?
- Battle of talikota in 1565: fall of Vijaynagara; many small kingdoms emerged
- In 1612, Hindu kingdom under Woddeyars emerged
- Nanjraj and devraj reduced Woddeyar king to mere puppets in early 18th cent
- Under frequent threat of marathas, Hyder Ali replaced them as de facto rulers in 1761
- set up arms factory at dindigul with help of french
- introduced Western methods of training
- started using diplomatic manouevres to counter his opponents
- brought to submission Poligars of S. india
- still defeated by Marathas under MadhavRao, bt after his death in 1772, he struck back and recovered his lost territories
British Conquest of Mysore:
First Anglo-Mysore war?
- 1767-69
- backgrnd:
- English treaty with Hyd nizam which gave the former Northern Circars and the latter assistance against Haider Ali
- HA had territorial disputes with Nawab of arcot and Marathas
- What happened?
- HA paid Marathas to turn them neutral
- promised to share conquered territories with Nizam
- joined Nizam to attack nawab of Arcot
- forced English to sign a humiliating ‘treaty of Madras’ in 1769; English promised to help HA in case he was attacked
British Conquest of Mysore:
2nd Anglo-Mysore war?
- 1780-84
- backgrnd:
- when attacked by Marathas in 1771, english didn’t come to his aid
- felt French more helpful in meeting his army’s reqof guns, saltpetre and lead
- Breaking out of American war of indep in which french supported th rebels
- spooked by French occupancy of Mahe, under HA, English captured Mahe
- forged an anti-English alliance with Marathas and Nizam; bt English (undr Sir Eyre Coote) did the same what HA did in first Anglo-Mysore war; defeated HA in Porto Novo in 1781
- Treaty of Mangalore: HA died in Dec 1782; Tipu sultan carried on fight fr a yr; finally treaty signed in 1784- mutual restitution of conquered territories
British Conquest of Mysore:
3rd Anglo-Mysore war?
- Backgrnd:
- Travancore purchased Jalkottal and Cannanore frm Dutch in Cochin state, which was a feudatory of Tipu
- Tipu attacke Trvancore and english sided with the latter
- british under Leadershipof Cornwallis; also aid of Marathas and nizam
- Treaty of Seringapatnam:
- 1/2 of Mysore territory taken away: brits got Baramahal, Dindigal and Malabar; Nizam gt areas frm krishna and beyond Pennar; Marathas got regions surrounding Tungabhadra
- war damage of 3 cr
- 2 sons of Tipu taken hostage until damage was paid
British Conquest of Mysore:
4th Anglo-Mysore war?
- backgrnd:
- Tipu declared himself sultan in 1796
- in 1798, Lord Wellesley took over, an imperialist
- English : general stuart and General Arthur wellesley
- division of Mysore territories betn Nizam, marathas and English
- the remaining state of Mysore handed over to old Woddeyar dynasty- Krishnaraj III, who accepted subsidiary Alliance
- 1831: Bentick took control of Mysore on grnds of misgovernance
- 1881: Lord Ripon restored the kingdom to its ruler
Tipu sultan?
- Tiger of Mysore
- organised his army on European lines with Persian words of command
- trained his army with help of French officers
- navy: set up a board of Admiralty and planned fr a fleet of 22 battleships and 20Large frigates; 3 dockyards estab at Mangalore, Wajedabad and Molidabad
- patron of S&T: pioneer of rocket tech in india; wrote a military manual explaining rockets
- introduced sericulture to Mysore
- grat lover of democracy: support to French soldiers at Seringapatam in setting up a Jacobian club in 1797 and himself became a member and called himself ‘Citizen tipu’;planted tree of Liberty at Seringapatam
- though crushed Coorgs and Nairs as well as MuslimMoplahs
- sanctioned funds fr repair of Sringeri temple and installation of Goddess Sarda
- credited with beginning of capitalism at a time when feudalism was prevalent
Anglo-Maratha Struggle:
Rise of Marathas?
organised in a confederacy by Bajirao I
Under the name ofMaratha King sahu:
- gaekwad of Baroda
- bhonsle of Nagpur
- Holkars of indore
- Sindhias of Gwalior
- peshwa of Poona
Anglo-Maratha Struggle:
1st A-M war?
- backgrns:
- death of Madhavrao in 1772
- succeeded by narayan Rao as 5th peshwa
- his uncle, Raghunath Rao had him assassinated and named himselfas Peshwa
- this was contested by NarayanRao’s infant son Sawai Madhavrao’s claim, under his mother and 12 Maratha chiefs led by Nana Phadnavis
- treaty of surat: betn RaghunathRao and English in 1775
- gave them Salsette and Bassein
- revenues frm surat and Bahruch district
- he was to be provided with 2500 english soldiers
- Bengal british council though annulled TreatyoSurat and replaced it with Treaty of Purandhar that renounced Raghunath
- Nana Phadnavis granted French a port on west coast; nw whole EIC was on the same side
- Marathas under capable hands of Mahadji Sindhia defeated british and signed Treaty of Wadagaon that forced English to relinquish to all territories acquired by them since 1775
- Warreh Hastings rejected Treaty of Wadgaon and defeated Marathas in a series of battles; Finally, Treaty of Salbai was signed with peshwa.
Anglo-Maratha Struggle:
1st A-M war:
tretay of Salbai?
- guaranteed peace betn the two sides fr 20 yrs
- Salsette remained with British while bassein restored to marathas
- English shud nt support raghunath rao and Peshwa wud grant him a maintenance allowance
- haider Ali shud return all territory taken frm english and Nawab of Arcot
- English to continue trade privileges as before
- Peshwa shud nt support any other European nation
- Mahadji Sindhia mutual guarantor of treaty
Anglo-Maratha Struggle:
2nd A-M war?
- Backgrnd:
- suicide of Peshwa Madhavrao Narayan in 1795
- BajiRao II, son of raghunathRao became Peshwa
- death of Nana Phadnavis in 1800
- Holkar defeated combined armies of Peshwa and Sindhia at hadaspur, near Poona, and placed Amritrao (adopted brother of Bajirao II) as Peshwa
- Treaty of bassein: betn bajirao II and English
- Sindhia and Bhonsle tried to save Maratha independence bt were defeated by arthur Wellesley and forced to conclude separate subsidiary alliances
- Bhonsle: Treaty of devgaon
- Sindhia: treaty of Surajiarjangaon
- Holkar: Treaty of Rajpurghat
Anglo-Maratha Struggle:
Treaty of bassein?
- Highlights:
- military support frm EIC; to be permanently stationed in his territories
- cede to company territories worth income of 26 L
- surrender city of Surat
- give up claims of chauth on Nizam’s territories
- no employment to any other Europeans at war with english
- subject his relations with other states to control of English
- Significance
1. Company had already troops at Hyd, Mysore and Lucknow; nw also at Poona; in essence ‘gave the English the key to india’
Anglo-Maratha Struggle:
3rd A-M war?
- backgrnd:
- Lord Hasting’s imperialistic design
- Pindaris problem- Amir Khan and karim Khan adn chitu Khan
- wounded pride of Marathas since treaty of bassein
- One last ditch attempt made by all the Maratha states incl peshwa; all defeated
- peshwa at khirki: treaty of Poona
- Bhonsle at Sitabaldi:
- Holkar at mahidpur: Treaty of Mandasor
- treaty of Gwalior with Sindhia
- In June 1818, Peshwa surrendered and Maratha confederacy was dissolved
- Peshwa bajiRao became a british retainer
- Pratap Singh, a descendent of Shivaji made ruler of Satara
Conquest of Sindh:
HIstory of Sindh?
- In 18th cent, was ruled by Kallora chiefs
- 1758: English factory built at Thatta, owing to a parwan given by Kallora prince, Ghulam Shah; also excluded other europeans frm trading there; had to close the factory in 1775 due to the new ruler who was nt so friendly
- In 1783, Talpuras under Fatah Ali Khan replaced kalloras; On the orders of the Durrani monarch, he shared the country with his 4 brothers-Char Yar
- Mir fatah died in 1800 and the Char yar divided Sindh among themselves calling themselves the Amirs or Lords of Sindh
Conquest of Sindh: Events unfolding highlights?
- Gradual Ascendancy over Sindh
- Treaty of ‘Eternal friendship’
- Treaty of 1832
- Sindh policy under Lord Auckland
- tripartite treaty of 1838
- Sindh accepts subsidiary alliance
- Capitulation of Sindh
Conquest of Sindh:
Gradual ascendancy over Sindh?
- Lord Wellesley’s main concern wa to counter the alliance of French, Tipu sultan and Shah Zaman, the Kabul monarch
- The amir, under influence of tipu Sultan plus anti-British party at the court, asked British agent to quit within10 days in 1800. This was humiliating fr Brits
Conquest of Sindh:
Treaty of ‘Eternal friendship’?
- Threat: alliance of tilsit with alexander I of Russia and napolean bonaparte, planned to invade India via land route; British wanted to create a barrier in bet
- Lord Minto sent
- Metcalfe to lahore
- Elphinstone to Kabul
- malcolm to tehran
- Nicholas Smith to Sindh
- Amirs agreed to their first ever treaty with English- of ‘Eternal friendship’ in 1807; also remewed it in 1820
Conquest of Sindh:
Treaty of 1832?
- In1832, William bentick sent Colonel Pottinger to SIndh to sign treaty with Amir
- free passage to English traders and travellers
- use of Indus fr trading purposes
- Hwever, NO warships or war materials wud be carried
- no Eng merchant wud ettle down in SIndh; passports needed fr travel
- No military dues or tolls and tariff rates may also be reduced by Amirs
- Amirs wud work with raja of Jodhpur to put down robbers of kutchh
Conquest of Sindh:
under Lord Auckland?
- sought Sindh to save India frm Russian invasion plus to obtain a counteracting influence over Afghans; thus Sindh was the stepping stone fr Afghanistan
- Ranjit Singh captured Rojhan, a frontier town in Sindh
- Company offered troops to be kept in capital at Amir’s expense; Amirs relented and agreed to a tripartite treaty with English and Ranjit Singh in 1838.
- Treaty of 1838 permitted English to intervene in disputes betn AMirs and Sikhs plus establish a British resident with troops in capital; Treaty of 1838 effectively turned Sindh into a British protectorate
- Later on, also made Emperor Shah Shuja to give up his soverign rights on Sindh, agreeing topay the arrears of tributes
Conquest of Sindh:
Sindh accepts Subsidiary Alliance?
in 1839
also had provison to supply fr an auxiliary force fr Afghan war, if called upon
Conquest of Sindh:
capitulatin of Sindh?
- 1st Anglo-Afghan war fought on Sindh soil; plus paid by SIndh
- in return, Amirs were charged with treassonable activities against the British and Ellenborough sent Outram to sindh to frame a new treaty by which Amirs were to cede provinces as a payment fr treason
- Later, in a succession dispute, Napier intervned and stated a war against amirs
- In1843, Sindh was merged into British empire and Charles napier appointed the 1st Guv
Conquest of Sikhs:
Consolidation of PJ uner Sikhs?
- after murder of Guru Gobind Singh, a section rose under leadership of banda Bahadur and revolted aginst Mughal ruler Bahadur Shah
- 1715: banda bahadur defeated and killed by Farrukhsiyar
- Sikh polity got divided into- Bandai (liberal) and Tat Khalsa (orthodox)
- this schism ended under Bhai Mani Singh in 1721
- 1784: Kapur Singh Faizullapuria organised Sikhs under Dal Khalsa: Khlasa was formed into2 sectons: Budha dal and Tarun dal
- Dal Khalsa consolidated during Nadir shah and abdali invasions; Sikhs consolidated into misls
- misls were military brotherhoods with democratic set up
- central admin of misls was based on Gurumatta Sangh, which was political, socal and economic system
Conquest of Sikhs:
Ranjit Singh?
- was son of Mahan singh, leader of Sukarchakiya misl. born in 1780 in Gujranwala, now in Pakistan
- During end of 18th cent, all misls except Sukarchakiya as well as Afgans were in chaos and RS took advantage of it
- given the title Lion of Punjab (Sher-e-Punjab) because he stemmed the tide of Afghan invaders in Lahore
- RS followed policy of ‘Blood and Iron’
- appointed Guv of Lahore in 1799 by Zaman shah, ruler of Afghanistan
- IN 1805, RS acquired Jammu and amritsar
- had good relations with nepal and enlisted Dogras in his army
- His general Hari Singh Nalwa built the Fort of Jamrud at the mouth of the Khyber Pass, the route the foreign rulers took to invade India.
- At the time of his death, he was the only sovereign leader left in India, all others having come under the control of EIC
- He also employed a large number of European officers, especially French, to train his troops. He appointed French General Jean Franquis Allard to modernise his army. In 2016, the town of St Tropez unveiled the maharaja’s bronze statue as a mark of respect.
- He turned Harimandir Sahib at Amritsar into the Golden Temple by covering it with gold.
- He is also credited with funding Hazoor Sahib gurudwara at the final resting place of Guru Gobind Singh in Nanded, Maharashtra.
Conquest of Sikhs:
ranjit Singh and english?
- under apprehenison of joint french-Russian invasion, Lord Minto sent Charles Metcalfe to Lahore in 1807; negotiations failed though
- frm 1809, he becam ethe weaker side in talks with English as the threat of invasion subsided, his need was nt that critical fr Company
- treaty of Amritsar was signed in 1809 with company
- It accepted river sutlej as boundary betn Sikh state and Company’s territories; thus checked RS’s ambition to rule over entire Sikh nation
- RS turned west and captured Multan, Kashmir (1819) and peshawar
- signed tripartite treaty in 1838
- refused to give passage to british to attack Dost Mohammad, afghan Amir
- dies in 1839
Conquest of Sikhs:
after death of Ranjit Singh?
- his sudden death led to court factions battling it out=> chaos
- Finally, after murder of Sher Singh, a son of RS, in 1843, Dalip Singh, a minor son of RS, was proclaimed Maharaja with Rani Jindan as regent and Hira singh dogra as wazir; wazir was then murdered and finally, Lal Singh, lover, replaced him as wazir
- First Anglo-Sikh war
Conquest of Sikhs:
1st Anglo-Sikh war?
- causes:
- anarchy in Lahore and mistrust betn court and army
- suspicion among sikh army due to British military campaigns agiainst Gwalior and Sindh and afghanistan
- increase in no. of british troops stationed near border with Lahore
- finally, British army crossed Sutlej in dec 1845
- Lahore fell in feb 1846
- Treaty of Lahore (1846):
- war indemnity of >1cr; Sikhs unable to pay war indemnity, Kshmir incl Jammu was sold to ulab singh fr 75L
- Jalandhar Doab (betn Beas and Sutlej) annexed
- british resident placed at lahore under Henry lawrence
- strength of Sikh army reduced
- Daleep Singh recognised as ruler ; Queen JIndal as regent and Lal Singh as wazir
- Sikhs rebelled again as they were dissatisfied with the treaty=> Treaty of Bhaironwal: Rani Jindan was removed and a council of regency was instituted consistin of 8 Sikh sardars and headed by Henry Lawrence
Conquest of SIkhs:
2nd anglo-Sikh war?
- causes;
- humiliation in 1st war + inhumane treatment to Rani Jindan
- Mulraj, Guv ofMultan revolted and along with Sher Singh led a mass uprising in Multan; this was the immediate cause
- Lord dalhousie, was a hardcore expansionist and jst needed a pretext
- Lord Dalhousie himself proceeded to PJ and fought 3 imp battles (1848-49):
- Battle of ramnagar
- Battle of Chillhanwala
- battle of Gujarat (small town on banks of Jhelum): Sikh army surrendered at Rawalpindi and their Afghan allies chased out
- result:
- surrender of Sikh army
- annexation of PJ
- 3-member board to govern PJ: John and henry Lawrence and Charles Mansel
- In 1853, baord was nullified and PJ was placed under a achief-commissioner- John lawrence
Extension of British paramountcy thru administrative policy?
- Warren hastings’ ‘Ring-Fence policy’: aimed at creating buffer zones to defend Company’s frontiers i.e defence of their neighbour’s frontiers at the latter’s expense
- reflectde in war against marathas and Mysore
- defence of Awadh against Marathas to defend bengal
- Wellesley’s subsidiary alliance: extension of WH’s Ring fence policy
- compelled to accept permanent stationing of a britishh force within his territory; pay a subsidy fr its maintenance; a british resident posted at his court; he cudn’t employ any other European without prior approval of british; all negotiations with any other Indian ruler after consult with Guv-Gen;
- in return defend against external threats and non-interference in internal matters
- over 100 small and big states
- Dalhousie’s doctrine of lapse: adopted son cud be heir to father’s pvt property bt nt the state; paramount power to decide; said to be based on hindu law and tradition; Dalhousie NOT the originator
- maharaja Ranjit Singh had alsoused this principle to annex some of his principalities
- similar acquisition on absence of heir was also done by EIC in 1820s
- Unlike his predecessors, Dalhousie operated on the general principle of ‘annexing if possible’
- Dalhousie annexed 8 states, incl 7 otbo Doctrine of lapse (eg. Baghat (MP)) and Awadh (by deposing Nawab Wajid Ali Shah on grnds of misgovernance)
Annexation of Awadh?
- continuous maladministration due to subsidairy alliance
- people under heavy taxes
- 1819: Nawab given title of king
- residents: Sleeman and Outram
- Dalhousie didn’t want to annex by Court of Directors ordered annexation
- turned out to be a political blunder-> 1857 revolt
Subsidiary alliance policy?
- in 1787, in awadh and treaty with carnatic, Company insisted no foreign relations clause
- 4 stages:
- offer to help with its troops to fight any war
- making a common cause with indian state and taking field with its own soldiers as well as those of the state
- Indian ally was asked nt fr men bt for money
- fee was fixed at very high levels, when state failed into arrears, Wellesley asked soverign rights over a part of the territory, in lieu of payment
Anglo-Bhutanese relations?
- occupation of Assam in 1816 brought the British into close contacts with Bhutan
- causes:
- Frequent raids by Bhutanese into adjoining territories in Assam and Bengal
- bad treatment meted out to Elgin’s envoy in 1863-64 and the treaty imposed on him by which he was forced to surrender passes leading to Assam
- Duar war: in 1865, British forces annexed these passes and stopped allowance paid to Bhutanese
- Treaty of Sinchula: Bhutan ceded territories in the Bengal and Assam duars; included was the tea producing district
- Treaty of Sinchula stood until 1910, when Bhutan and British India signed the Treaty of Punakha, effective until 1947
anglo-Nepalese relations?
- Gorkhas wrested control of Nepal from the successors of Ranjit Malla of Bhatgaon in 1760
- In 1801, the English annexed Gorakhpur which brought the Gorkhas’ boundary and the Company’s boundary together
- conflict started due to the Gorkhas’ capture of Butwal and Sheoraj in the period of Lord Hastings
- war, ended in the Treaty of Sagauli, 1816:
- Nepal accepted a British resident
- Nepal ceded Garhwal and Kumaon nd ceded claims to Terai
- Nepal also withdrew from Sikkim
- British empire now reached the Himalayas
Anglo-Burmese wars?
- first Burma war 1824-26
- Second war 1852
- Third war 1885
First Anglo-Burmese war?
- 1824-26
- cause: Burmese expansion westwards and occupation of Arakan and Manipur, and the threat to Assam and the Brahmaputra Valley
- Treaty of Yandabo, 1826: Burma to
- pay rupees one crore as war compensation
- cede its coastal provinces of Arakan and Tenasserim
- abandon claims on Assam, Cachar and Jaintia
- recognise Manipur as an independent state
- negotiate a commercial treaty with Britain
- accept a British resident at Ava, capital
Second Anglo-Burmese war?
- 1852
- cause:
- British commercial need: keen to get hold of timber resources of upper Burma and sought inroad to Burmese mkt
- the imperialist policy of Lord Dalhousie
- British occupied Pegu, the only remaining coastal province of Burma
- An intense guerrilla resistance had to be overcome before complete British control of lower Burma could be established
Third Anglo-Burmese war?
- 1885
- Cause:
- After the death of Burmese King Bhindan, his son Thibaw
succeeded to the throne, who was hostile to British and their merchants and capital interests - resisting French influence in Burma; as they were in war with French in NIger, Egypt and Madagascar
- After the death of Burmese King Bhindan, his son Thibaw
- Dufferin ordered the invasion and final annexation of upper Burma in 1885
- after 1st WW, Burmese nationalists joined hands with INC; to weaken thsi link, Burma was separated frm India in 1935
Anglo-Tibetan wars?
- Tibet was ruled by a theocracy of Buddhist monks (lamas) under nominal suzerainty of China
- cause: Chinese suzerainty over Tibet was ineffective and Russian influence at Lhasa was increasing
- Curzon felt alarmed and sent a small Gorkha contingent under Colonel Younghusband on a special mission to Tibet
- Tibetans refused to negotiate and offered non-violent resistance. Younghusband pushed his way into Lhasa (August 1904)
- Treaty of Lhasa (1904):
- Tibet would pay an indemnity of Rs 75 lakh, later revised to 25L
- as a security for payment, the GoIwould occupy the Chumbi Valley fr 75 yrs, later negotiated to mve after 3 yrs
- Tibet would respect the frontier of Sikkim
- Tibet would not grant any concession for railways, roads, telegraph, etc., to any foreign state, but give Great Britain some control over foreign affairs of Tibet
- Anglo-Russian convention of 1907 provided that the two great powers would not negotiate with Tibet, except through the mediation of the Chinese government
Anglo-Afghan relations: overview?
- cause: after the Treaty of Turkomanchai (1828), the English got alarmed about possible Russian plans regarding India and started search fr a scientific frontier frm Indian side
- Forward policy of auckland
- First anglo-Afghan war
- John Lawrence and policy of Masterly inactivity
- Lytton and policy of Proud reserve
- Second Anglo-Afghan war
Anglo-Afghan relations: Forward Policy of Auckland?
- take initiatives to protect the boundary of British India from a probable Russian attack
- either through treaties with the neighbouring countries or by annexing them completely
- Amir of afghanistan, Dost Mohammed, sought help frm Russia adn Persia to recover Peshawar frm Sikhs
- Tripartite Treaty, 1838 betn the deposed Afghan ruler, Shah Shuja, British govt and Sikhs
- Sikhs will help in military and company will finance Shah Shuja’s Enthronement
- Shah Shuja conduct foreign affairs with the advice of Sikhs and British
- Shah Shuja give up his sovereign rights over Amirs of Sindh
- Shah SHuja recognised Sikh ruler Ranjit SIngh’s claim over Afghan territories on the right of Indus
Anglo-Afghan relations: first anglo-Afghan war?
- 1838-42
- even though Persia and Russia were no more threats in Afghan politics, British contnued
- Dost Mohammed surrendered in 1840 and Shah Shuja made Amir
- bt as soon as British left, Afghan public rose in rebellion and British were forced to
- evacuate Afghanistan
- restored dost Muhammed
- In 1842, they tried again, bt again ended up evacuating and reconising Dost Muhammed as an independent ruler of afghanistn
Anglo-Afghan relations: John Lawrence and the Policy of
Masterly Inactivity
- a reaction to the disasters of the 1st Anglo-Afghan war
- Even when Dost Mohammed died in 1863, there was no interference in the war of succession
- Lawrence’s policy rested on the fulfilment of two
conditions—- that the peace at the frontier was not disturbed
- no candidate in civil war sought foreign help
- as Sher Ali established himself on the throne,Lawrence tried to cultivate friendship with him.
Anglo-Afghan relations: Lytton and the Policy of Proud Reserve?
- aimed at having scientific frontiers and safeguarding
‘spheres of influence’. - According to Lytton, the relations
with Afghanistan could no longer be left ambiguous
Anglo-Afghan relations: 2nd Anglo-Afghan war?
- 1870-80
- cause:
- Sher Ali, sought friendship with both Britain and Russia, while keeping geither at an arm’s length
- he refused to keep a british envoy in Kabul while agreeing to a Russian envoy earlier
- Lytton invaded and Sher Ali fled
-
Treaty of Gandamak (May 1879) was signed with Yakub Khan, the eldest son of Sher Ali.
- Amir conduct his foreign policy with the advice of GoI
- a permanent British resident be stationed at Kabul
- GoI give Amir all support against foreign aggression, and an annual subsidy
- bt again afghan public revolted; Lytton planned fr dismemberment of afghanistan bt cudn’t carry it out; Ripon abandoned the plan and decided tokeep Afghanistan as a buffer state
- After1st WW, Afghanistan demanded full independence and under Amamullah, declared an open war on British in 1919. Finally in 1921, Afghanistan recovered independence in foreign affairs
British India and the North-West Frontier
- conquest of Sindh (1843) and annexation of Punjab (1849) carried British boundaries beyond the Indus and brought them in contact with Baluch and Pathan tribes, who were mostly independent, but the Amir of Afghanistan claimed nominal suzerainty over them
- compromise reached with Amir of Afghanistan, Abdur Rehma, in 1893, when duran line was recognised betn British and afghan terri
- Durand Agreement (1893) failed to keep peace and soon there were tribal uprisings
- Curzon followed a policy of withdrawal and concentration; created NWFP directly under GoI (until 1932); overall Curzon’s policies resulted in a peaceful north-west frontier
Fight fr Betterment of women:
Prevalent Issues?
- Both Hindu and Muslim women socially and economically independednt
- education generally denied to them
- Hindu women had no right to inherit property; Muslim women cud inherit only half as much as men
- No equality in divorce powers brtn man and woman
- Polygamy prevalent among both Hindu and Muslims
- child marriage
- poor conditions of widows
- purdah
Fight fr Betterment of women:
Abolition of Sati?
led by raja ram Mohan Roy
1829: Govt declared practice of sati as illegal and triable as culpable homcide in Bengal Presidency bt extended in slightly modified forms to Madras and Bombay Presidencies in 1830
Fight fr Betterment of women:
femlae infanticide?
- common among upper class Bengalis and Rajputs
- Bengal regulations of 1795 and 1804 declared it illegal and equivalent to murder
- An 1870 act made it compulsory fr parents to register the birth of all babies and provided fr verification of female children fr some yrs after birth, particularly in areas where these practices were more prevalent
Fight fr Betterment of women:
Widow Remarriage?
- Supported by Brahmo smaj bt mainly led by Pt. IshwarChandra Vidyasagar, who cited Vedic texts to support it
- Vishnu Shastri pandit founded Widow Remarriage Association in 1850s
- karsondas Mulji, started ‘Satya prakash’ in Gujarati in 1852 to advocate widow remarriage
- Prof. D. K. karve (himself married a widow in 1893) in west India ; became secy to Widows’ Remarriage Association; opened a widows’ home in Poona to provied high caste widows vocational training
- Other advocates were:
- veerasalingam pantulu in Madras;
- B. M. Malabari
- narmad
- Justice M.G. ranade
- K. Natarajan
- finally led to Hindu Widows’ remarriage Act, 1856 which legalised widow remarriages ad declared issues frm such marriages as legitimate
Fight fr Betterment of women:
Girls’ education?
Girls’ health?
- Christain missionaries first to set up Calcutta female Juvenile Society in 1819
- powerful movement fr women’s edu rose in 1840s and 1850s
- J.E.D bethune founded Bethune School in 1849
- Pt. Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar was associated with setting up 35 girls’ schools in bengal
- Charles woods’ dispatch of 1854 laid great emphasis on women education
- other contributors: Jagannath Shankar Seth and Bhau Daji in MH
- D.K. Karve set up Indian womens’ university at Bombay in 1916;
- Lady Hardinge Medical college set up in 1916
- Health facilities began to be provided to women with opening of Dufferin Hospitals in1880s