The behaviourist approach Flashcards
Behaviourism - What are we born as?
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state)
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state).
How is behaviour learned?
Behaviour is learned from experience
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state).
Behaviour is learned from experience.
What is everything we become shaped by?
Everything we become is shaped by the process of learning from our environment
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state).
Behaviour is learned from experience.
Everything we become is shaped by the process of learning from our environment.
In order for psychology to be scientific, what should it focus on?
In order for psychology to be scientific, it should focus on observable behaviour that can be objectively measured
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state).
Behaviour is learned from experience.
Everything we become is shaped by the process of learning from our environment.
In order for psychology to be scientific, it should focus on observable behaviour that can be objectively measured, rather than what?
In order for psychology to be scientific, it should focus on:
1. Observable behaviour that can be objectively measured
,rather than
2. Things like cognitive processes that can only be inferred
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state).
Behaviour is learned from experience.
Everything we become is shaped by the process of learning from our environment.
In order for psychology to be scientific, it should focus on observable behaviour that can be objectively measured, rather than things like cognitive processes that can only be inferred.
What idea is rejected?
The idea of introspection is rejected
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state).
Behaviour is learned from experience.
Everything we become is shaped by the process of learning from our environment.
In order for psychology to be scientific, it should focus on observable behaviour that can be objectively measured, rather than things like cognitive processes that can only be inferred.
The idea of introspection is rejected.
What are the best way to achieve this?
Laboratory experiments are the best way to achieve this
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state).
Behaviour is learned from experience.
Everything we become is shaped by the process of learning from our environment.
In order for psychology to be scientific, it should focus on observable behaviour that can be objectively measured, rather than things like cognitive processes that can only be inferred.
The idea of introspection is rejected.
Laboratory experiments are the best way to achieve this.
Only what is measurable scientifically?
Only observable behaviour is measurable scientifically
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state).
Behaviour is learned from experience.
Everything we become is shaped by the process of learning from our environment.
In order for psychology to be scientific, it should focus on observable behaviour that can be objectively measured, rather than things like cognitive processes that can only be inferred.
The idea of introspection is rejected.
Laboratory experiments are the best way to achieve this.
Only observable behaviour is measurable scientifically and it is only what that should be studied?
- Only observable behaviour is measurable scientifically
2. It is only these behaviours that should be studied
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state).
Behaviour is learned from experience.
Everything we become is shaped by the process of learning from our environment.
In order for psychology to be scientific, it should focus on observable behaviour that can be objectively measured, rather than things like cognitive processes that can only be inferred.
The idea of introspection is rejected.
Laboratory experiments are the best way to achieve this.
Only observable behaviour is measurable scientifically and it is only these behaviours that should be studied, why?
Only observable behaviour is measurable scientifically and it is only these behaviours that should be studied, because thought processes are:
- Subjective
- Difficult to test
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state).
Behaviour is learned from experience.
Everything we become is shaped by the process of learning from our environment.
In order for psychology to be scientific, it should focus on observable behaviour that can be objectively measured, rather than things like cognitive processes that can only be inferred.
The idea of introspection is rejected.
Laboratory experiments are the best way to achieve this.
Only observable behaviour is measurable scientifically and it is only these behaviours that should be studied, because thought processes are subjective and difficult to test.
Why is it valid to study the behaviour of animals?
It is valid to study the behaviour of animals, because they share the same principles of learning (classical and operant conditioning)
Behaviourism - We are born as a tabula rasa (blank state).
Behaviour is learned from experience.
Everything we become is shaped by the process of learning from our environment.
In order for psychology to be scientific, it should focus on observable behaviour that can be objectively measured, rather than things like cognitive processes that can only be inferred.
The idea of introspection is rejected.
Laboratory experiments are the best way to achieve this.
Only observable behaviour is measurable scientifically and it is only these behaviours that should be studied, because thought processes are subjective and difficult to test.
It is valid to study the behaviour of animals, because they share the same principles of learning (classical and operant conditioning).
We are born a blank state, so there is no what on behaviour?
We are born a blank state, so there is no genetic influence on behaviour
Classical conditioning is one of the behaviourist principles of learning and is learning by association.
What is the key idea?
The key idea is that learning occurs when an association is made between:
- A previously neutral stimulus
- Reflex response
Classical conditioning is one of the behaviourist principles of learning and is learning by association.
The key idea is that learning occurs when an association is made between a previously neutral stimulus and reflex response.
This reflex response can be positive or negative.
If the association of the stimulus is with a positive feeling, then that positive feeling will arise whenever the person comes into contact with that specific stimulus.
The same is true for negative associations.
For example, 18 year old Kat has started university and is enjoying her fresher’s week.
A particular song is being played a lot during this time whilst she is out and she often dances to it.
She will make a positive association with that song and for years to come whenever she hears that song she will feel positive and happy.
Similarly, if Kat was miserable and homesick in that time, then she would feel bad whenever she heard that song.
Classical conditioning can be applied to many different situations.
What is one of the most memorable ways that someone can be conditioned?
One of the most memorable ways that someone can be conditioned is when they acquire a phobia
Classical conditioning is one of the behaviourist principles of learning and is learning by association.
The key idea is that learning occurs when an association is made between a previously neutral stimulus and reflex response.
This reflex response can be positive or negative.
If the association of the stimulus is with a positive feeling, then that positive feeling will arise whenever the person comes into contact with that specific stimulus.
The same is true for negative associations.
For example, 18 year old Kat has started university and is enjoying her fresher’s week.
A particular song is being played a lot during this time whilst she is out and she often dances to it.
She will make a positive association with that song and for years to come whenever she hears that song she will feel positive and happy.
Similarly, if Kat was miserable and homesick in that time, then she would feel bad whenever she heard that song.
Classical conditioning can be applied to many different situations.
One of the most memorable ways that someone can be conditioned is when they acquire a phobia.
What will they make an association between?
They will make an association between:
- An object/situation
- Fear
Classical conditioning is one of the behaviourist principles of learning and is learning by association.
The key idea is that learning occurs when an association is made between a previously neutral stimulus and reflex response.
This reflex response can be positive or negative.
If the association of the stimulus is with a positive feeling, then that positive feeling will arise whenever the person comes into contact with that specific stimulus.
The same is true for negative associations.
For example, 18 year old Kat has started university and is enjoying her fresher’s week.
A particular song is being played a lot during this time whilst she is out and she often dances to it.
She will make a positive association with that song and for years to come whenever she hears that song she will feel positive and happy.
Similarly, if Kat was miserable and homesick in that time, then she would feel bad whenever she heard that song.
Classical conditioning can be applied to many different situations.
One of the most memorable ways that someone can be conditioned is when they acquire a phobia.
They will make an association between an object/situation and fear.
This is illustrated by the rather unethical work of Watson and Rayner (1920), who classically conditioned a boy named ‘Little Albert’ to become phobic of rats.
How was this done?
This was done by the presentation of an unconditioned stimulus of a loud noise at the same time as the rat
Classical conditioning is one of the behaviourist principles of learning and is learning by association.
The key idea is that learning occurs when an association is made between a previously neutral stimulus and reflex response.
This reflex response can be positive or negative.
If the association of the stimulus is with a positive feeling, then that positive feeling will arise whenever the person comes into contact with that specific stimulus.
The same is true for negative associations.
For example, 18 year old Kat has started university and is enjoying her fresher’s week.
A particular song is being played a lot during this time whilst she is out and she often dances to it.
She will make a positive association with that song and for years to come whenever she hears that song she will feel positive and happy.
Similarly, if Kat was miserable and homesick in that time, then she would feel bad whenever she heard that song.
Classical conditioning can be applied to many different situations.
One of the most memorable ways that someone can be conditioned is when they acquire a phobia.
They will make an association between an object/situation and fear.
This is illustrated by the rather unethical work of Watson and Rayner (1920), who classically conditioned a boy named ‘Little Albert’ to become phobic of rats.
This was done by the presentation of an unconditioned stimulus of a loud noise at the same time as the rat.
After following this procedure several times, what happened?
After following this procedure several times, Little Albert started to cry whenever he was shown a rat, even though he had previously not been scared of it
Who was classical conditioning documented for the first time by?
Classical conditioning was documented for the first time by Ivan Petrovich Pavlov
Classical conditioning was documented for the first time by Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (1849 - 1936).
Pavlov was a physiologist whose research work initially focused on the digestive system of dogs.
To do this, he had a dog harnessed to a bench with a tube coming out of its mouth and going into a jar.
When his assistant came into the laboratory with the food for the dog, Pavlov noticed that the dog salivated upon hearing the sound of the door.
Dogs salivate automatically when they see food, but Pavlov’s dog had clearly made an association with the imminent arrival of food when the door was opened.
Pavlov decided to look at this association as his research.
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so what did Pavlov do whenever the dogs were given food?
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food
Classical conditioning was documented for the first time by Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (1849 - 1936).
Pavlov was a physiologist whose research work initially focused on the digestive system of dogs.
To do this, he had a dog harnessed to a bench with a tube coming out of its mouth and going into a jar.
When his assistant came into the laboratory with the food for the dog, Pavlov noticed that the dog salivated upon hearing the sound of the door.
Dogs salivate automatically when they see food, but Pavlov’s dog had clearly made an association with the imminent arrival of food when the door was opened.
Pavlov decided to look at this association as his research.
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
What then happened?
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food
Classical conditioning was documented for the first time by Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (1849 - 1936).
Pavlov was a physiologist whose research work initially focused on the digestive system of dogs.
To do this, he had a dog harnessed to a bench with a tube coming out of its mouth and going into a jar.
When his assistant came into the laboratory with the food for the dog, Pavlov noticed that the dog salivated upon hearing the sound of the door.
Dogs salivate automatically when they see food, but Pavlov’s dog had clearly made an association with the imminent arrival of food when the door was opened.
Pavlov decided to look at this association as his research.
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
What did this eventually mean?
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present
Classical conditioning was documented for the first time by Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (1849 - 1936).
Pavlov was a physiologist whose research work initially focused on the digestive system of dogs.
To do this, he had a dog harnessed to a bench with a tube coming out of its mouth and going into a jar.
When his assistant came into the laboratory with the food for the dog, Pavlov noticed that the dog salivated upon hearing the sound of the door.
Dogs salivate automatically when they see food, but Pavlov’s dog had clearly made an association with the imminent arrival of food when the door was opened.
Pavlov decided to look at this association as his research.
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present.
What did Pavlov also find out about the process?
Pavlov also found out several other points about the process:
- Stimulus generalisation
- Stimulus discrimination
- Time contiguity (temporal contiguity)
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present.
Pavlov also found out several other points about the process - Stimulus generalisation, stimulus discrimination and time contiguity (temporal contiguity).
1. Stimulus generalisation:
Pavlov found that if he varied the bell pitch and tone, what?
Pavlov found that if he varied the bell:
1. Pitch
2. Tone
,the dogs would still salivate
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present.
Pavlov also found out several other points about the process - Stimulus generalisation, stimulus discrimination and time contiguity (temporal contiguity).
1. Stimulus generalisation:
Pavlov found that if he varied the bell pitch and tone, the dogs would still salivate.
What did this mean?
This meant that:
1. If a stimulus has characteristics close to the conditioned stimulus
,then
2. The association would also be made to that new stimulus
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present.
Pavlov also found out several other points about the process - Stimulus generalisation, stimulus discrimination and time contiguity (temporal contiguity).
1. Stimulus generalisation:
Pavlov found that if he varied the bell pitch and tone, the dogs would still salivate.
This meant that if a stimulus has characteristics close to the conditioned stimulus, then the association would also be made to that new stimulus.
In the case of Watson and Rayner’s ‘Little Albert’ study, the little boy was not only frightened by the original white rat, but also what?
In the case of Watson and Rayner’s ‘Little Albert’ study, the little boy was not only frightened by:
1. The original white rat
,but also
2. Other small furry animals and white fluffy objects
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present.
Pavlov also found out several other points about the process - Stimulus generalisation, stimulus discrimination and time contiguity (temporal contiguity).
1. Stimulus generalisation:
Pavlov found that if he varied the bell pitch and tone, the dogs would still salivate.
This meant that if a stimulus has characteristics close to the conditioned stimulus, then the association would also be made to that new stimulus.
In the case of Watson and Rayner’s ‘Little Albert’ study, the little boy was not only frightened by the original white rat, but also other small furry animals and white fluffy objects.
What is this an example of?
This is an example of how the stimulus can be generalised to other similar things
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present.
Pavlov also found out several other points about the process - Stimulus generalisation, stimulus discrimination and time contiguity (temporal contiguity).
1. Stimulus generalisation:
Pavlov found that if he varied the bell pitch and tone, the dogs would still salivate.
This meant that if a stimulus has characteristics close to the conditioned stimulus, then the association would also be made to that new stimulus.
In the case of Watson and Rayner’s ‘Little Albert’ study, the little boy was not only frightened by the original white rat, but also other small furry animals and white fluffy objects.
This is an example of how the stimulus can be generalised to other similar things.
What is stimulus generalisation?
Stimulus generalisation is when a stimulus becomes generalised to other related stimuli that are also associated with the conditioned response
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present.
Pavlov also found out several other points about the process - Stimulus generalisation, stimulus discrimination and time contiguity (temporal contiguity).
2. Stimulus discrimination:
At some point, there has to be a cut-off point, where what?
At some point, there has to be a cut-off point, where:
- The association will not be made
- The stimulus generalisation will not occur
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present.
Pavlov also found out several other points about the process - Stimulus generalisation, stimulus discrimination and time contiguity (temporal contiguity).
2. Stimulus discrimination:
At some point, there has to be a cut-off point, where the association will not be made and the stimulus generalisation will not occur.
This is called stimulus discrimination and happens when what?
This:
- Is called stimulus discrimination
- Happens when the characteristics of the conditioned stimulus and an object become too different to be generalised
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present.
Pavlov also found out several other points about the process - Stimulus generalisation, stimulus discrimination and time contiguity (temporal contiguity).
2. Stimulus discrimination:
At some point, there has to be a cut-off point, where the association will not be made and the stimulus generalisation will not occur.
This is called stimulus discrimination and happens when the characteristics of the conditioned stimulus and an object become too different to be generalised.
Example
For example, Little Albert would not associate a big brown dog with fear, because, although it is an animal, it varies in:
- Size
- Colour
- Type
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present.
Pavlov also found out several other points about the process - Stimulus generalisation, stimulus discrimination and time contiguity (temporal contiguity).
2. Stimulus discrimination:
At some point, there has to be a cut-off point, where the association will not be made and the stimulus generalisation will not occur.
This is called stimulus discrimination and happens when the characteristics of the conditioned stimulus and an object become too different to be generalised.
For example, Little Albert would not associate a big brown dog with fear, because, although it is an animal, it varies in size, colour and type.
What is stimulus discrimination?
Stimulus discrimination is when a stimulus is not associated with the conditioned response, because it is too different from the original stimulus
When dogs hear a bell, there is no reflex response (apart from maybe pricking up their ears), so Pavlov rang a bell whenever the dogs were given food.
The sound of the bell then became associated with the food.
This eventually meant that whenever he rang the bell, the dogs would salivate, even if there was no food present.
Pavlov also found out several other points about the process - Stimulus generalisation, stimulus discrimination and time contiguity (temporal contiguity).
3. Time contiguity (temporal contiguity):
What did Pavlov find?
Pavlov found that the association only occurs if the unconditioned stimulus and neutral stimulus are presented: 1. At the same time Or, 2. Around the same time as each other