7-Advanced topics in measurement Flashcards
common
qCombining targets sometimes eases analysis
qHowever, we need to analyze the Y-axis
Multiple Targets on One Graph
may be Estimated given the Rate provided that the Variability is not too great, or that there are no Outliers.
formula:
• Recording interval/count
Helps to remember there are: 60 minutes in 1 hour and 3600 seconds in 1 hour.
IRT
- Rate = Responses / Time
If rate is 6 per hour, that is same as 6 times per 60 minutes (6/60 minutes).
IRT = Time Units / Responses
Solve for the average IRT by dividing the time by the number of responses (60 minutes/6).
Therefore estimated IRT is 10 minutes; that is there is about 10 minutes (on average) between the end of one response and the beginning of
another response.
- Rate = Responses / Time
If rate is 120 per hour, that is same as 120 times per 3600 seconds (120/360 seconds).
IRT = Time Units / Responses
Solve for the average IRT by dividing the time by the number of responses (3600 seconds/120).
Therefore the estimated IRT is 30 seconds;
that is there is about 30 seconds (on average) between the end of one response and the beginning of another response.
IRT examples
- total count (Calculated by (Smaller/LargerX 100 )
- percent agreement
(Calculated by (Agreements/Agreements +
Disagreement) X 100).
• yields the same value as total count for direct measurement
•used primarily for indirect measurement methods
.
Also by looking at interval-by-interval.
- Number of intervals agreed to/number of intervals agreed + number of intervals disagreed x 100
• can look at either scored intervals or unscored intervals.pppopp
two main methods determining interobserver agreement
Common to have multiple targets on one Graph
Combining targets on one graph sometimes eases Analysis
However, we need to Analyze the Y-axis.
When Selecting targets to Measure we need to assess if the targets typically occur together. Ex. Aggression and screaming.
Multiple targets on one graph
when targets are related ( co-occur)
If they are all acceleration or deceleration targets of similar scales
if all targets are scaled approximately the same (or use dual axes
Multiple targets may be graphed together..
It may be Appropriate to measure more than one Dimension of a behavior.
Commonly, Frequency and Duration are measured together to provide a more complete picture.
Consider Latency and Duration
Perhaps data are collected on one Dimension until target behavior occurs.
If aggression is rare, but tends to occur in “Bursts”, may be interested in rate or IRT for period of
time after an instance of Aggression is recorded.
Alternatively, some dimensions are occasionally included in Definitions
Ex, Duration As a requirement and tantrums; latency in compliance.
Multiple dimensions
Personal experience warning: I have found that it is easier to Present multiple dimensions of the same target on one graph when the data paths are Separated to allow visual analysis.
If not the case, use Multiple graphs.
Multiple dimension presentation
Often multiple Dimensions of a single target are included on a single graph.
Can Collapse dimensions as part of
Definition of target..
-May be beneficial
-loses some precision
Multiple dimensions displayed on a single graph can be beneficial if:
- dimensions are Scaled approximately equally (or use multiple axes)
- data paths are sufficiently Separate to allow visual analysis.
Take Aways
Procedure designed to Decelerate behavior oProtect clients that temporarily limits movement or access to reinforcers.
procedures designed to keep individuals safe (most common examples of target behaviors include aggression, self-injurious behavior, and property destruction)
designed to Decelerate behavior (Typically more severe/resistant problematic behavior
May protect individuals and have other affects as well.
If these are going to be used they must always be tracked
Most often, the target behavior that necessitates the restrictive procedure is tracked along with the procedure
restrictive (also called restrictives) i
A procedure that is used to protect a client should he or she engage in behavior that is dangerous to self or others, has the potential to cause significant property damage, or expose the client to legal consequences
These procedures are not part of the treatment plan
Almost always some form of reporting structure for this procedure, i.e. incident report
Even if not, should collect as much information about incident as possible
These data off and yelled significant information concerning target behavior
Emergency procedures
Always graph restrictive
May or may not graph emergency procedures
When feasible graph restrictive procedure and target together
Some takeaways/emergency procedures
BC BA level clinicians will probably not be taking all of the data for a given client.
Therefore, collect data on staff implementation
Monitoring staff Implementation a.k.a. integrity checks, important for:
• Acquisition: provides information on teaching procedures
• Deceleration: provides information on effectiveness and proper implementation
Staff Implementation
are taught to graph everything
However it is possible to go overboard
Fairly adept at presenting data
If we choose to do so, we could hide information in graphs
Must uphold rigorous standards to avoid missed leading others
Behavior analysts –Misuse of data
Largely automated but do not have to be
instances of responding/data
- Words written in a dissertation. Only the number of words you get down in a month is of interest.
- Deaths in an Industry
- Exercise
Cumulative records
Important in clinical work (tiger)
Could use:
•percent selected per option
• Time spent
• cumulative recording
Choice
(1) Determine what one Trial will be (for example, untied shoe).
(2) Decide how to Report number of trials or number of block trials), for example, when tying shoes could use Trials
but for cleaning the kitchen might use Blocks of trials.
(3) Record Count
If using block it would be number of trials before one can complete all of the steps in the block
- Present data
Steps when conducting trials-to-criterion
Evaluate the efficacy of different teaching strategies
Assessing learner confidence
Limitation: behavior that is difficult to count
Ex. Precision teaching versus discrete trials
Homogeneous ability groups versus random classroom assignments
Trials to criterion: when to use
(Review definition)
Method for classifying responses into discrete categories
Expressed as percentage of responses for each code
Similar to frequency but,
-Most often used when several different behaviors occur
-there’s limited number of opportunities to Observe
Ex: independence with washing hands. Use task analysis form with codes: i= independent. VP = verbal prompt; GP = gestural prompts etc.
Ex. severity codes, duration codes, independence codes
Limitations : not dimensional quantities
Discrete categorization – coding
Targets do not have to be related like handwashing
• Aggression 1: makes contact with another person
• Aggression 2: leaves red mark
•Aggression 3: brakes skin
Discrete categorization – considerations