5.1 the kingdom of God in Luke Flashcards
1
Q
What are the main differing views about the arrival of the kingdom of God?
A
- past
- present
- future
- both present and future
2
Q
What is the argument of a past arrival of the kingdom?
A
- the kingdom was established before Jesus and continues on into the present and future
3
Q
Who argues for a past arrival?
A
- Hans Conzelmann
4
Q
What does Conzelmann argue?
A
- salvation history is divided into 3 stages:
- the age of Israel
- Jesus’ ministry
- Jesus’ ascension
5
Q
What is meant by a present arrival of the kingdom?
A
- it is made known to people through the life and teachings of Jesus
6
Q
Who argues for a present eschatology?
A
- C H Dodd
7
Q
What does Dodd argue?
A
- realised eschatology is a present kingdom, that is available to all (13:30) and with people now (17:21)
8
Q
What is meant by a future arrival of the knigdom?
A
- it’s an eschatological happening; the second coming of Christ, the parousia
9
Q
Who argues for a future kingdom?
A
- Albert Schweitzer
10
Q
What does Schweitzer argue?
A
- imminent eschatology = all Jesus’ teachings were pointing to one time, and imminent future
11
Q
What is the argument that the arrival of the kingdom is both in the present and the future?
A
- the kingdom came into being through Jesus’ life BUT will be completed in the future
12
Q
Who argues for both a present and future arrival of the kingdom?
A
- Ian Marshall
13
Q
What does Marshall argue?
A
- an inaugurated eschatology, the kingdom was present in the ministry of Jesus; Jesus offers salvation to all and Jesus speaks of the future parousia that will arrive when least expected (12:40)
14
Q
What is a criticism of Conzelmann’s argument?
A
- it ignores the apocalyptic nature of Luke 21
15
Q
What is a criticism of Dodd’s argument?
A
- all interpretations assume realised eschatology is correct