3.1 the problem of evil + theodicies Flashcards

1
Q

What is meant by natural evil?

A

evil caused by the natural state of things
e.g. the 2018 Indonesian earthquake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is meant by moral evil?

A

evils that have come about as a direct result of human intentions and choices e.g. murder, theft, rape, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which of the evils is easier to explain for religious believers?

A

moral evil as it is caused by humans exercising their free will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the logical problem of evil?

A
  • put forward by the pre-Christian Greek thinker Epicurus and focuses on the inconsistent triad
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the inconsistent triad?

A
  • the premises that God is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent are inconsistent with the fact that evil exists:
  • if God is omnipotent, he can stop evil
  • if God is omniscient, he knows about evil and how to stop it
  • if God is omnibenevolent, he would want to stop evil
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Hume add to the logical problem of evil?

A

as evil does exist, the God of classical theism doesn’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does J L Mackie propose in ‘Evil and Omnipotence’?

A

there are adequate and fallacious solutions to the problem of evil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the adequate solution to the problem of evil according to Mackie?

A
  • changing the nature of God/limiting the meaning of omnipotence
  • either God isn’t capable of doing the logically impossible OR evil is not a thing
    HOWEVER in practice they reassert the proposition that God is omnipotent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the fallacious solutions to the problem of evil?

A
  • offering ways to solve the problem while retaining the theistic concept
  • claiming that evil is necessary for free will, or the counterpart to God BUT whilst they claim to keep the theistic concept they don’t try to hide
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is meant by the paradox of omnipotence?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the evidential problem of evil?

A

proposed by JS Mill and William Rowe
- God allows evil to occur in order to achieve a higher good BUT what higher good can excessive suffering serve
- there seems to be no good reason why God permits evil
- the existence of evil, although logically consistent with the existence of God, lowers the probability of the truth of theism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Augustine’s theodicy?

A
  • argues that evil isn’t an actual phenomenon, its a privation of good
  • evil came about from the original sin in Gen 3 which has corrupted human nature for all future generations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are some strengths of Augustine’s theodicy?

A

+ biblical basis
+ evil isn’t part of God’s plan
+ free will is necessary, without it belief in God is meaningless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are some weaknesses of Augustine’s theodicy?

A
  • the fall is taken as literal
  • if we are created with free will why should we be punished
  • Was God not powerful enough to create a world where the Fall never happened?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Irenaeus’ theodicy?

A
  • God gave humanity free will in order to achieve a particular purpose - to allow humans to develop moral and spiritual perfection to develop in the image of God
  • to achieve moral perfection, humans must be given free choice, God must be at an epistemic distance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does John Hick develop Irenaeus’ theodicy?

A

the process of soul-making makes the existence of evil justified
- we develop ‘virtues through hardship’ + these freely developed virtues are infinitely better than any virtues God could have instilled in us from scratch

17
Q

What are some strengths of the value of soul-making?

A

+ responsibility is placed on humans, not God
+ free will is consistent with our experience

18
Q

What is a weakness of the value of soul-making?

A
  • Why does this journey to God take so long?
19
Q

What is Process theodicy?

A
  • the world is understood to be dynamic and constantly changing - there’s a natural process/order that governs the world which God initiated
  • evil occurs when there’s discord with this order
20
Q

What are strengths of process theodicy?

A

+ God doesn’t let evil occur rather than can’t prevent it
+ omnibenevolence is more important than omniscience and omnipotence

21
Q

What is a weakness of process theodicy?

A
  • no promise of reward