4.1.3 Oligopoly Flashcards
1
Q
oligopoly
A
dominated by a small number of firms
2
Q
concentration ratios
A
- gives us detail on oligopolies and the strength of their market power
- Measures the extent to which a market or industry is dominated by a few leading firms
- Calculated by adding the market shares of the biggest firms in the industry → Biggest three = three firm ratio
- Oligopoly exists when the top five firms in the market account for more than 60% of total market sales
- More competitive when lower concentration ratios → more smaller firms
- Can provide insights into the degree of market power held by largest firms
- Shows asymmetry between large/small firms and the distribution of market power
3
Q
key features of an oligopoly
A
- Product branding
- Barriers to entry are significant → EOS, vertical integration to control supply chains/distribution
- Inter-dependent decision making: firms take into account the reactions of their rivals to any change in price, output or forms of non-price competition
- Cannot take over eachother as they all have similar power → increasingly competitive market
- There can be a market leader (eg tesco)
- Non price competition: consistent feature of the competitive strategies of oligopolistic → product differentiation including branding, quality variations, and adverting to create brand loyalty
- Can cause an increase in costs → market research etc
4
Q
Competition
A
- Large firms in the market are interdependent: watch eachothers prices and there is significant competition
- Competition is either price or non price
- Eg supermarkets
- High advertising costs
- Location of stores
- Setting up small stores that compete with convenience stores
- Price wars are not ideal: all profits suffer, so there is an incentive to keep prices fairly stable and limit competition on them
- Aldi and lidl: increased market shares in UK supermarkets → less stable market
5
Q
price competition in an oligopoly
A
- Price wars: firms lower prices to gain market share which ends in reduced profits for all
- Predatory pricing: firms set low prices with the intent of driving competitors out of the market, and then it raises prices after
- Limiting prices: a strategy where a dominant firm sets prices low enough to discourage new entrants into the market
6
Q
non price competition in an oligopoly
A
- more important as interdependence reduces freedom of changing prices
- Product differentiation: firms emphasize unique qualities and features of their products through branding, quality, design or advertising
- Advertising and marketing: firms engage in extensive advertising and marketing campaigns to create brand loyalty and awareness
- Innovation: development of new products, tech or processes
- Customer service: offering exceptional customer service and support as a competitive advantage
- Distribution channels: efficient distribution networks to reach customers faster and more conveniently
7
Q
kinked demand curve
A
- If firm increase prices, other firms will keep prices stable to gain CA, and firm A loses profits (elastic)
- If fim A reduces P, other firms cut prices to keep competition, so you have the same demand for lower prices = lower revenue (inelastic)
- Oligopoly: base decisions on competition
8
Q
why is collusion beneficial
A
- Price stability
- Reduced marketing and advertising costs if firms co-operate and not compete
- Guaranteed supply from producer cartel
- Can raise prices of exports: increased investment and revenues for countries that need it (emerging countries with natural resources)
- Avoid price wars
- Can raise prices and limit competition: increasing profits collectively -> all benefit
- Overt collusion reduces risk and increases certainty
9
Q
what is overt collusion
A
firms openly agree to cooperate and set prices/output levels so cartels are created
10
Q
collusion is easy when
A
- Small number of firms in market
- Substantial barriers to entry
- Large number of customers
- Total market demand not too variable → inelastic ped
- Output can be easily monitored
- Price discounts are hard to deliver: hard to undercut rivals on pricing
11
Q
why are cartels unstable
A
- Falling demand causes excess capacity in the industry, eg economic downturn
- Non cartel firms enter the market, not under cartel agreements
- Exposure of illegal price fixing by gov/regulators
- Over-production and excess supply which breaks price fixing
- Prisoners D: collusion breaks down as firms have an incentive to cheat
- Joint profit maximisiation does not mean each firm is maximising profits on their own
- Long run, firms want larger profits → tradeoff between agreements and profit motive
12
Q
tacit agreement
A
- Understanding that develops between competing businesses
- No formal agreement but firms do not try to increase competition levels
- Set prices at similar levels and stick to non price competition
- Different to perfect competition, where all firms are price takers
- Sellers with significant market share can become a price maker → price leadership
- This rise in prices leads to others increasing prices
- A range of price strategies is chosen
- Price war can occur
13
Q
Non collusive behaviour
A
- Competition: firms may choose to compete aggressively to gain market share and increased profits individually
- Legal constraints: regulation and antitrust laws, encouraging individual competition
- Different objectives: firms have different goals and incentives making collusion difficult
14
Q
prisoners dilemma and Game theory
A
- 2 rational firms
- Aggressive competition, they may trigger a price war and both suffer low profits
- If both firms collude and set high prices, they wil both have high profits
- Each firm has an incentive to betray and gain higher profits, but if both firms do this they both suffer
- Not best outcome for consumers