3.6.1 Poverty and inequality Flashcards
what is relative poverty
Do not have enough income to participate fully in society in which they live, varies according to standard of living (less than 60% of median incomes)
what is absolute poverty
Not having enough income to provide basic necessities and survive, over a long period of time and affects you ability to be well (food, clothing, clean water, shelter) (less than $1.90 a day)
what does relative poverty lead to
- Leads to social exclusion: excludes people from the ‘normal’ → what an average person can do in society
- Eg not having a bank account due to homelessness and paying in cash
why is the median used to measure relative poverty
Median is used as it gets rid of extreme incomes : these skew data, making average earning alot higher than it actually is
what features does absolute poverty have
- Not enough to keep a person physically well and afford necessities like clean water, food, shelter, clothing etc
- MPI: multidimensional poverty index → safe water, sanitation, child mortality, education, health
differences between absolute and relative poverty
- Threshold of Absolute poverty is constant but relative poverty threshold changes with income in a country
- Absolute poverty can be eradicated, but relative poverty will always exist in countries with different levels of income
Exam question
- Define and compare
- Absolute and relative data for 2 application marks
- Impact of both on poverty and explain difference in the context of the question
people who struggle to get welfare
- Asylum seekers → people without UK citizenship
- Homeless people → less represented are young people, people who have left care, people with mental illness and addiction, ex prisoners and army veterans
- Pensioners → winter fuel budget reduced by labour gov before budget → already has triple lock (goes up by 2.5%, matches inflation, or rise in average earnings)
- Minorities → curriculum barrier, class distinctions, urban vs rural → worsern cultural sensitivities
gini coefficient
Calculated from Lorenz curve
- Provides an objective measure of income inequality and ranges from 0 to 1 or 0 to 100
- Closer to 0 = more equal
- UK GINI 0.35 before housing costs and 0.39 after housing costs
- Gini = A/(A+B) → from LC
- Lower GC: northern european countries → inequality policies, developed countries → left leaning gov in the past or now
- Communist countries, Russia and China
- Higher GC → developing countries, subsaharan Africa, Southern America
lorenz curve
- Closer to perfect equality (y=x), more equal
- Read X axis cumulatively
- X axis: cumulative % of population
- Y axis: cumulative % of income
- Draw perfect inequality line and label
- Label any drawn curves with years
- Show change over time by arrow from OG to changed curve
why is inequality beneficial
- Additional income is an incentive for more training
- Increases economic growth due to increased spending which can decrease absolute poverty
- Reflects talent and effort rewards
- Not true for all workers, without technology and innovation in developing countries, not alot of value can be added
why isnt inequality beneficial
- Increases rich poor gap: less spending and gov has to increase welfare spending to support them
- Lack of buying normal goods, less demand for manufacturing, limits economic growth
- Decreased disposable income, decreased AD and economic growth