21 - Models and Theories of Speech Perception Flashcards
What are the 3 main categories of speech perception theories?
Active vs Passive
Bottom-up vs Top-Down
Autonomous vs Interactive
How do active and passive speech perception theories differ?
Active - link between speech production and speech perception
Passive - passive sensory processes
How do bottom-up and top-down theories differ?
Bottom-up: info in the acoustic signal leads to sound and word recognition
Top-down: linguistic and cognitive processes play an important role in sound and word recognition
How do autonomous and interactive speech perception theories differ?
Autonomous - sound is processed in a serial manner with limited interaction between levels or stages
Interactive - lots of parallel interactions among levels
What is the proposed basic unit of perception in the Motor Theory?
The intended articulatory gesture
-this theory proposes that speech is perceived by processes that are also involved in its production, and perception involves a matching between incoming acoustic-phonetic info and stored representations for articulatory gestures
What are the strengths of the motor theory?
It proposes solutions to the unit of speech, context-sensitivity, and segmentation problems
- suggests that, despite well known acoustic variability of speech, the underlying motor commands and articulatory gestures are relatively invariant
Name 2 of the 5 criticisms of the motor theory
- difficult to obtain empirical support for the role of articulatory gestures in speech perception
- may be more efficient to propose that we go directly from acoustics to phoneme identification instead of intermediate step of gesture matching
- articulatory data has shown that speech gestures are highly variable and demonstrate context-sensitivity
- children born with severe speech production and planning disorders often demonstrate normal speech perception
- adults with acquired disorders can show normal speech perception
How does the motor system participate in speech perception (i.e what evidence supports this)?
- motor units in muscles related to speech production show enhanced excitability when individuals listen to speech
- speech motor regions of the cortex (primary motor cortex and Broca’s area) activated when individuals hear words
- mirror neurons in the cortical motor areas are activated both during execution and observation of actions
- transcranial magnetic stimulation of speech production regions of the cortex can lead to faster recognition of phonemes
Why should we be cautious of using mirror neurons as support for the motor theory?
Mirror neurons in motor areas appear to respond to a wide range of sound/environmental noises and may not be specific to speech sounds
The motor theory of speech perception is a long standing and controversial theory. Why does it continue to be relevant today?
Recent research appears to support the idea that speech production processes may play a role in speech perception