Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

PSYC 101 > 2) Research Methods > Flashcards

2) Research Methods Flashcards

1
Q

What are the two modes of thinking?

A

Intuitive & Analytic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intuitive thinking

A

System 1
- Quick & reflexive
- Gut hunches
- Not much mental effort since brain is on autopilot
- Not always right
- Use of heuristics

ex/ form first impression on smb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Heuristics

A

Mental shortcuts or rules of thumb that help us make sense of world
- Can lead to errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Analytical thinking

A

System 2
- Slow & reflective
- Takes mental effort, trying to reason through a problem
- Can override intuitive thinking and reject gut hunches

ex/ first learning to drive car

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an operation definition and what kinds of variables are included?

A

A concrete way to measure an abstract concept
- Includes situational, response, & participant variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe whether participant, response, and situational variables can be manipulated and/or measured

A

Situational: can measure & manipulate
Response: measure only
Participant: measure only, cannot be manipulated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the key to generalizability?

A

Random selection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the three key characteristics of a scientific method?

A
  1. Random Selection
  2. Evaluating measures (reliability & validity)
  3. Openness & transparency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What 2 things make a good measure?

A

validity & reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the difference between validity and reliability

A

Validity = accuracy, whether it’s measuring what it’s supposed to

Reliability = consistency, stability of the measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is external validity?

A

Generalizability
- degree to which a study’s findings can be generalized to population from which sample was drawn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ecological Validity

A

degree to which the setting of a study mirrors real life settings
- subtype of external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Internal Validity

A

the extent to which a causal conclusion can be made
- usually high in well designed experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is our first concern with any measure, reliability or validity?

A

reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Population vs Sample

A

Sample is drawn from population, then generalize back to population

  • bigger sample = more likely to be representative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the differences between random selection, sampling, and assignment?

A

Selection
- how sample is obtained from population
- impacts generalizability
- random = has equal chance of being selected to be in experiment

(Sampling is same as selection^)

Assignment
- in experiments ONLY
- how sample is split into conditions
- impacts internal validity
- random = has equal chance to be in conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is sampling bias and what does it impact?

A
  • how a sample is obtained might be biased
  • impacts generalizability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are WEIRD samples?

A

most research studies are conducted on:
Western
Educated
Industrialized
Rich
Democratic

example: arrow longer vs shorter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is a non experimental design?

A

design where experimenter does not manipulate or control any of the variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the types of non experimental designs?

A

case study
observation
correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Naturalistic Observation

A
  • watch behaviour in real world WITHOUT manipulation
  • Some behaviours are better understood irl cuz can’t replicate envo in lab
  • does not involve sampling!
  • non experimental
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Naturalistic observation pros & cons

A

pros
- high in external validity

cons
- low in internal validity
- cannot make causal claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Case Study

A
  • examine one person or small number of ppl in depth (sometimes over long time)
  • can study rare conditions that cannot be recreated in lab
  • cannot draw sample!!
  • non experimental
24
Q

Case study pros & cons

A

pros
- can provide existence proofs
- allow us to study rare or unusual phenomena
- can offer insights for a way to generate hypotheses / later testings

cons
- can be misleading cuz anecdotal
- cannot generalize
- cannot make causal claims

25
What are existence proofs?
demonstrations that a given psychological phenomenon can occur - usually from case studies
26
Self Report Measures
Assess characteristics by asking directly, aka questionnaires - Closely related is surveys (used to measure opinions and attitudes)
27
Self report measures pros & cons
pros - Easy to administer - measures of personality traits and behaviours work well cons - People may not have enough insight to report accurately - Can obtain different answers depending on how questions are phrased - People may not understand the answers they give - Dishonesty: response sets or malingering
28
What is a response set?
tendency of research participants to distort responses to make them look better
29
What can counter some problems with self report data and why?
rating data - ppl don't have the same blind spots when rating someone else rather than themselves (more objective)
30
What is the drawback of rating data?
Halo effect
31
Horns Effect
- Opposite of halo - Tendency of ratings of one negative trait to spill over and influence to ratings of other negative traits
32
Halo Effect
- tendency of ratings of one positive characteristic to influence ratings of other ones
33
Correlational Designs
- Examines extent to which two or more variables are associated - Measure variables without manipulating them - non experimental
34
Correlational design pros & cons
pros - can help us predict behaviour cons - cannot imply causation!
35
describe the correlation constant (r)
- statistic that index the strength of relationship - strength is absolute value - only useful for LINEAR relationships -1 (perfect negative) 0 (no relationship OR it's not linear) 1 (perfect positive)
36
How is correlational data collected & analyzed?
on a scatterplot
37
what does it mean when r is 0 in correlational data?
no relationship OR there is a relationship but it is not linear
38
Illusory Correlation
- perception of statistical association between variables when none exists - form basis of many superstitions
39
Why are we prone to illusory correlation?
Our minds are - not good at remembering nonevents - pay more attention to times when things happen To minimize tendency, we should pay more attention to disconfirming instances
40
Experimental Design
- characterized by random assignment and manipulation of an independent variable - allows cause and effect inferences
41
Experimental vs correlational design
- differences are created (exp) vs measured (corr) - can draw causal inferences (exp) vs cannot (i.e. high internal validity vs low)
42
Describe internal validity in an experimental design
Ability to infer the IV causes changes in the DV Must have: 1. Covariation between the 2 variables 2. Temporal precedence (A must come before B) 3. Eliminate plausible alternative explanations Can the difference in the DV be attributed ONLY to the manipulation of the IV?
43
How can we achieve internal validity in experiments?
1. Experimental Control Manipulate IV with no confounds 2. Random assignment Balances influence of variables across conditions
44
Confounds
- intertwined with IV and impacts DV - could explain part of the result - source of false conclusions
45
Random assignment is more effective (for achieving internal validity) as the sample size ____
increase
46
Between subjects design vs within subject design
btwn - assign diff groups to control & exp conditions within - each participant acts as their own control
47
What are some pitfalls in experimental designs?
Placebo effect Nocebo effect Experimenter Expectancy Effect Demand Characteristics
48
Experimental design pros & cons
pros - high internal validity, can infer causation cons - can sometimes be low in external validity
49
Placebo Effect
Improvement resulting from the expectation of improvement ex/ we think more expensive meds work better
50
How can we avoid the placebo effect in experimental designs?
Use a placebo: participants shouldn't know whether they have the real or placebo treatment
51
True or false: Placebo effect is all in people's heads
false, placebo effects are just as real as drugs
52
Nocebo effect
evil twin of placebo effect - harm resulting from expectation of harm ex/ ppl allergic to roses sneeze when presented with fake ones
53
Experimenter Expectancy Effect
Form of involuntary and unconscious cueing by the researcher that impacts participant’s behaviour ex/ horse that can do math
54
How can we avoid the experimenter expectancy effect in experimental designs?
double blind - neither researchers nor participants are aware of who's in which conditions
55
What are demand characteristics? What aspect of experimental design is it a threat to?
any feature of an experiment that might inform participants of the purpose of the study - a threat to internal validity
56
How can we minimize the effects of demand characteristics in experimental designs?
use deception cuz participants might try to help OR hurt, can be due to social desirability
57
Describe the difference between quasi-experimental vs experimental designs
1. Also use a control group but NO random assignment - selected based on pre-existing values of IV rather than assigned values - should still be some kind of intervention, ex/ can't ask eye colour cuz ppl born with it 2. Less internal validity, cannot make causal statements 3. allows its wide use in ethical issues common example: study brain before and after getting a concussion

PSYC 101 (15 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions