12 Child in the Legal System Flashcards

1
Q

What are the focus points for understanding a child in the legal system?

A
  1. Understanding the legal system
  2. Development of memory ability
  3. Social & emotional development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the background on victims/witnesses of crime for children in the legal system?

A

Special case of child abuse: when they are the sole witness

Statements are super important with a sole witness to prosecute especially when it is a 5-year-old child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the background on the type of questioning that can occur in a child in the legal system?

A

Pretrial (investigative interviews) - parent or caregiver starts asking questions

During court appearance: evidence-in-chief and cross-examination - everything you are saying is scrutinized so it is specifically difficult for young children to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why do children require special treatment in the legal system?

A

They are considered “vulnerable witnesses”

  • A group of people with cognitive delays considered as vulnerable witnesses
  • Ethnic backgrounds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are some important factors kids should understand in the legal system?

A

Understanding court processes
-Issues for kids to understand court processes by lack of understanding

Understanding the concept of truth and lies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In understanding court processes, what fears do you think the child would feel?

A
  • Speaking in front of others
  • Making a mistake
  • Punishment for mistakes
  • Retaliation (increased from 7-13 yrs)
  • Having to see the defendant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Cashmere & Bussey (1990): Comprehension study?

A
  • Need to prove own innocence
  • Likelihood of jail for witness
  • Role of witness
  • Need to tell the truth
  • Cognitive and emotional responses are interlinked -> struggled with understanding questions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What type of support and preparation for court do children need?

A
  • Helping children understand what to expect
  • Interactive courtroom diagram
  • Website of justice & attorney general
  • Older children: cartoon version of the charter of victims rights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What type of screens and CCTV help children in understanding court processes and/or relieve a child’s fear?

A
  • Evidence in chief by way of the pre-recorded interview: if one was completed by the police
  • In children, if the police pre-record the interview with the child they can actually tender that video as evidence as to your evidence in chief
  • That video becomes the statement the child has to give rather than physically doing it in trial
  • Closed-circuit TV (CCTV): is not in the actual room of the court but in another room or for older children it is screening the defendant from the child
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is evidence in chief?

A

The main evidence is given in support of the case outlined by the main lawyer acting on behalf of the state (in a criminal case) or a private person (in a civil case) at the start of a trial. During their evidence in chief, all of the men had the same story to tell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In understanding truth and lies, a child’s evidence can be accepted without taking the oath if:

A

a. Told it was important to tell the truth

b. Declares will not lie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What constitutes a lie?

A
  • Factuality
  • Belief of speaker
  • Intent of the speaker
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Piaget research state about lies?

A

Naughtiness of lies judged by consequences, not the intention. Till 8-10 years
-Judged by the consequence not by the act of itself - if there is no negative consequences a lie is still bad cause you’re lying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does more recent research state?

A

Pre-schoolers can judge intention if salient BUT evaluation of goodness/naughtiness of truth vs lies is still shaky

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Bussey (1992) find out about lies in children in his research?

A

Pre-schoolers, 2nd and 5th graders

  • Stories which varied factuality, punishment, whether listener believed
  • E.g. J scribbled on her friend’s book, J’s friend asked if she had scribbled, J said “No I didn’t scribble” (OR “yes I did”) adult said ‘I don’t believe you”, J got in trouble

Pre-schoolers:

  • Understood mismatch with reality BUT
  • Thought punished lies worse than unpunished lies
  • Unlikely to express pride over the truthfulness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are two things we need to know in children understanding truth and lies?

A
  • We need to know for certain that a child is telling the truth
  • Testing a child’s understanding of a lie
17
Q

According the NSW Oaths ACT (1990) on whether children can be encouraged to tell the truth, a child’s evidence can be accepted without taking the oath if:

A

(i) Child is told important to tell the truth

(ii) Child declares they will not lie

18
Q

According to Lyon et al (2008) study, will this work?

A

Child development - children (4-7 years old) coached by an adult to:
(a) deny playing with dolls house or (b) falsely report playing

Compared instructions:

  • Oath: “Promise to tell the truth. Will you tell me any lies?” effective
  • Reassurance: “if something.. Bad happened its ok. You won’t get into trouble.. We can try to fix it” ineffective
  • No instructions

Findings:

  • Reassurance ineffective
  • “Oath” helpful for free recall but less helpful when highly suggestible questions
19
Q

What is the truth and lie ceremony?

A

From the equality before the law bench book (NSW)

Competence to give unsworn evidence is presumed if the child is told:

  • It is important to tell the truth - child states that they will do so
  • Someone might as questions you don’t know the answer to, if so, it’s ok to say I don’t know
  • You shouldn’t feel pressured to agree with suggestions that aren’t true (say if you don’t agree with something: say that’s not right)

*This has an important effect on what happens in trials

20
Q

What develops in understanding legal (& general) language?

A
  • Vocabulary
  • Grammar
  • Use of language in social contexts

*Both receptive and expressive language

21
Q

What are gradual acquisition across primary school years of concepts of and vocabulary for:

A
  • Number
  • Distance
  • Weight
  • Time
  • Height
22
Q

How does the vocabulary for relevant concepts affect understanding in children?
(body parts, relational terms, month/days, receptive language)

A
  • Body parts: families often have idiosyncratic terms for “private” body parts
  • Relational terms: before, after, yesterday, tomorrow, earlier, later
  • Words for days of the week, months, seasons
  • Receptive language: can children monitor their understanding of adults questions?
  • Comprehension monitoring
23
Q

What does comprehension monitoring involve?

A

Identifying the problem
Selecting an appropriate strategy
Social-emotional skills

24
Q

What is Saywitz (1995) understanding of language?

A

Even if they realise they don’t understand, young children may be reluctant to say “I don’t know”/”I don’t understand”

Saywitz trained 6 and 8 years olds to:
(1) Monitor comprehension
(2) Signal lack of comprehension
Q: Will the children tell us if they don’t understand the question?

  • Three groups: (1) No intervention (2) “Tell me if you don’t understand” (3) Comprehension monitoring strategy training
  • Instructed children:
    o Indicated lack of comprehension more and asked for rephrasing more
25
Q

What did all this research about understanding legal (and general) language help with?

A

All this research developed a base of how we interact with children nowadays

26
Q

What is the background of the development of memory ability?

A

Miscarriages of justice

  • Some of the teachers were accused of abusing the children
  • More people became worried about what is going on
  • Information was taken out of context - the interpretation of the police of the information that embellished the story
  • Memory can be contaminated with suggestive questions and leading questions

Encoding -> storage -> retrieval

  • Encode it into memory, while it’s not being used it is being stored through a serious of networks till its being retrieved
  • Different factors can affect any of these stages
27
Q

What is memory ability in terms of experience?

A

Memories aren’t exact reproductions of experience: they are constructed at storage and reconstructed at retrieval

“Memory elaborates, deletes and shapes its content, at encoding, storage and retrieval”

28
Q

What type of memory ability were children found to have?

A

Poor memory and free recall in children

  • More disorganized storage
  • More rapid decay
  • Poor retrieval strategies
  • Selective retrieval: focus on one part and forget the rest
  • Knowledge limitations: they don’t understand certain specifics and will explain in different ways or have no understanding of it
29
Q

How does grouping work when it comes to recalling of memories?

A
  • Your knowledge (hopefully) helped you to organize the letters into meaningful groups and so store and retrieve them more efficiently
30
Q

How do we prompt children’s memories?

A

Free recall: “tell me everything you can remember about the time when” -> minimal information and few errors

Specific Qs: “what colour hair did he have?” -> maximal information but many errors

31
Q

What is the trouble with specific questions?

A

Yes/no or forced-choice (multiple choice) questions are particularly prone to errors

32
Q

Children’s limited free recall: do anatomical dolls help? (Bruck, Ceci, Franceoer & Rennick (1995)

A

Not with free recall
- a very small increase of correct reports of genital touch but no false reports of genital touch

Helpful with specific questions
-92% correctly reported genital touch but 8% incorrectly reported genital touch

Young children may be encouraged to give false reports by the dolls

33
Q

In terms of social and emotional development, children may not recall but they:

A
  • Perceived expectations

- Failure to comprehend reason for questions

34
Q

In terms of social and emotional development, children may recall information but fail to report due to:

A
  • Embarrassment
  • Pressure not to disclose
  • Threaten family if you disclose so might recall it but don’t report it
35
Q

In terms of social and emotional development, children reluctance to disclose distressing information:

A
  • Lack of knowledge re-appropriate adult behaviour
  • Threats
  • Self-blame, embarrassment
  • “it won’t make any difference”
  • Perceived supportive context
  • Language, cognitive competence
36
Q

Explain the child’s reluctance to say “I don’t know” and the relevant study

A

Children’s are reluctant to say “I don’t understand what you are asking” “could you say that in a different way”

Research study: asking children bizarre questions e.g. “Is milk bigger than water?”

  • Most 5-7-year-olds attempted a response
  • Older children more likely to qualify their answer (“it might be because…”)
  • Are children misinterpreting the adult’s expectations/conversational rules?
  • Very detrimental within a forensic situation
  • Pressure will influence what the child will report
37
Q

What is suggestibility?

A

We are all vulnerable to accepting incorrect information/suggestions that we encounter

In general, suggestibility decreases with age

38
Q

What makes children suggestible?

A
  • Poorer memory (in general)
  • (respond more to) Explicit pressure by adult questioners
  • (struggle more with) Source monitoring ability
    • > Young ones difficult to determine what they heard from someone or what they experienced themselves
  • (how an adult feels about a situation or person influences the child by using it within their memories) “Contamination” by adult questioner’s preconceptions
  • Simple compliance (when a child knows something didn’t happen)