Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

PYB215 forensic psych > week 7 > Flashcards

week 7 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Psychology 101 flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

what are the types of witnesses

A

fact witness
expert witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is a fact witness

A

someone who provides relevant evidence about their direct experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 2 primary functions of an expert witness

A

aid in understanding a particular issue relevant to the case
provide an opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what can fact witness testify

A

only what they have directly observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are some challenges of providing expert testimony

A

experts need to know not only about their testimony but about the proceedings and their role in the proceedings
providing effective testimony to the courts is difficult because of differences that exist between the fields of psychology and law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

in the US what are the rules of expert testimony called

A

frye and daubert and federal rules of evidence (FRE702)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the 5 rules of expert evidence in Australia

A

expertise rule
area of expertise rule
factual basis rule
common knowledge rule
ultimate issue rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

in NSW, TAS, ACT they use the uniform evidence law instead of what rule

A

ultimate issue rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the expertise rule

A

does the witness have knowledge and experience sufficient to entitle him or her to be held out as an expert who can assist the Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the area of expertise rule

A

is the claimed knowledge and expertise sufficiently recognised as credible by others capable of evaluating its theoretical and experiential foundations? eg. the area of your expertise is the only area you can supply info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the common knowledge rule

A

is the information sought to be elicited from the expert really something upon which the tribunal needs the help of any third party or can the tribunal rely upon its general knowledge and commonsense eg. is this commonsense knowledge that the general public could’ve understood without an expert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the ultimate issue rule

A

is the experts contribution going to have the effect of supplanting the function of the tribunal to decide the issue before the court? eg. they cannot say whether this person is innocent or guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the factual basis rule

A

to what extent can an experts opinion be based upon matters not directly within the experts own observations eg. can they show the steps that got them to their conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what did daubert v merrel dow propose

A

that evidence should be based on realibility and validity eg. testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

where does the daubet v merrell dow apply

A

in federal jurisdictions, but has been adopted by some states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why do we want to having things tested

A

potential for misrepresentation or falisificaiton
error rate
whether it has been subject to peer review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

for daubert v merrell dow, testimony is admissable if it is:

A

provided by a qualified expert
relevant
reliable, as determined by the daubert criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what does the daubert criteria require from research

A

be peer reviewed
be testable (falsifiable through experimentation)
have a known error rate
adhere to professional standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what type of testimony did daubert relate to

A

all expert testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what type of testimony did daubert relate to prior to kumho case

A

scientific testimony only

21
Q

what is the rule 702. testimony by expert witnesses

A

a witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion

22
Q

what are the exemptions for rule 702

A

a. the experts scientific, technical, or other specialised knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue
b. the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data
c. the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods
d. the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case

23
Q

what is the frye v usa (1923) case

A

james was charged with murder and protested lie detector would prove innocence. court held that polygraph lacked scientific recognition.
Revolves around general acceptance in the relevant community.

24
Q

what is the criticism surrounding frye v USA

A

criticised as being too generous with evidence that is generally accepted (hair sample testing) but not actually validated (95% likely to be wrong)

25
Q

what resulted from the frye v usa case

A

general acceptance test

26
Q

what is the general acceptance test

A

in order for novel scientific evidence to be admissable, it must be established that the procedures used to arrive at the testimony are generally accepted in the scientific community

27
Q

what is a major criticism for the general acceptance test

A

vagueness of terms general acceptance and whether trial judges can make this determination

28
Q

what are the realities of expert testimony

A

has little to do with the fielf of expertise and more to do with:
- how the judge feels
- whether the evidence is for the prosecution or defence

29
Q

what percentage of prosecution experts survive defence challenges compared to defence experts

A

92% compared to 33%

30
Q

what percentage of prosecutors experts are admitted to trial compared to defence

A

95% compared to 8%

31
Q

why do prosecution experts make it to trial and not defence

A

uniform, money, pro-prosecution bias, budget

32
Q

different ways a psychologist could be an expert witness

A

family law court
experimental
testifying about a client (not recommended)
testifying as a mental health clinician
forensic assessor

33
Q

type of psychology family law court testifying

A

magellan cases: physical or sexual child assault

34
Q

what is experimental psychology expert witness

A

reaction time and eyewitness testimony, psycholinguistics

35
Q

ethical principles underpinning forensic psychology:

A

respect for the dignity and rights of other people
responsibility to clients, society and other profession
veracity
fidelity
beneficence
non-maleficence
justice

36
Q

what is veracity

A

honest and truthful

37
Q

what is fidelity

A

entrusted with clients interests

38
Q

what is beneficence

A

do good

39
Q

what is non-maleficence

A

do no harm

40
Q

what is justice

A

be fair and objective

41
Q

what are the 3 main objects of the mental health act 2016

A

to improve and maintain the health and wellbeing of persons who have a mental illness who do not have the capacity to consent to be treated
to enable persons to be diverted from the criminal justice system if found to have been of unsound mind at the time of committing an unlawful act or to be unfit for trial
to protect the community if persons diverted form the criminal justice system may be at risk of harming others

42
Q

what type of decision is insanity

A

a legal one not a clinical one

43
Q

in advising the court regarding insanity, FP look for whether the person had the capacity to:

A

understand what they were doing
control their actions
know that they should not do the act, or make the omission

44
Q

what is meant by fitness

A

competent to stand trial

45
Q

what do fp experts look for regarding fitness

A

whether the person is able to:
plead at their trial
instruct their lawyer
endure the trial

46
Q

what do fp experts examine

A

criminal responsibility/insanity
fitness

47
Q

differences between criminal responsibility and fitness

A

CR is behaviour at the time of offence and fitness is the behaviour at the time of examination

48
Q

what is expert evidence dictated by

A

rules or evidence and whim

PYB215 forensic psych (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions