week 3 & 4 BTE/FTE Flashcards

1
Q

what is the percentage of students who rely on re-reading as their study strategy

A

84%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the percentage of students who rely on self-testing as their study strategy

A

11%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

definition of the backwards testing effect

A

testing improves later test performance by helping with memory retention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is transfer appropriate processing

A

testing works best when study and test formats are similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the retrieval effort hypothesis

A

harder retrieval practices lead to better memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the mediator effectiveness hypothesis

A

testing helps connect related concepts, improving memory through semantic connections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are some benefits of testing on mental health

A

reduce stress and anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is another name for backwards testing effect

A

testing effect or retrieval practice effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why do students quiz themselves according to Kornell and Bjork (2007)?

A

To check understanding (68%), because it’s effective (18%), or they find it more enjoyable (9%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Roediger and Karpicke (2006) discover about testing vs. re-studying?

A

testing leads to better long-term memory retention, especially over longer intervals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the results of McDaniel et al.’s (2007) classroom study?

A

Quizzing improved test scores more than just re-reading materials. short answer quizzes were more beneficial than multiple choice questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

in Karpicke et al 2009 survey amongst college students, what is the % of students that rated self-testing as their top strategy?

A

1%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What materials did participants in roediger and karpicke 2006 study in the experiment during phase 1 (encoding)?

A

Two prose passages, one about “the sun” and the other about “sea otters.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How was the study design structured in roediger and karpickes 2006 study?

A

Participants studied one passage twice (re-study condition).
Participants studied the other passage once and then took a free-recall test (testing condition).
No feedback was provided after the initial test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was phase 2 (final test) in roediger and karpickes 2006 study?

A

ptsp completed final free recall tests for each passage, either 5 mins, 2 days or 1 week later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the best strategy to remember info for longer than 5 mins?

A

test-taking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what does retrieval practice serve as?

A

desirable difficulty

18
Q

what was the purpose of Agarwal et al. (2021) Study

A

To evaluate the effects of retrieval practice (e.g., quizzing) on learning outcomes in classrooms using a meta-analysis of 50 experiments.

19
Q

what were findings of Agarwal et al 2021 study

A

94% of studies showed positive effects of retrieval practice on learning.

20
Q

what was Kromann et al 2009 study

A

medical students completed a resuscitation course following stimulated cardiac arrest

21
Q

what was the method of kromann et al 2009 study

A

Intervention Group: Received 3.5 hours of teaching/training plus 30 minutes of low-stakes testing.
Control Group: Received 3.5 hours of teaching/training plus 30 minutes of scenario practice (not tested).
Two weeks later, participants completed a practical test on managing a simulated unresponsive patient.

22
Q

The forward testing effect demonstrates that interim testing can improve memory for ___ information, ___ corrective feedback is provided.

A

new, regardless of if

23
Q

When Kornell and Bjork (2007) asked their participants why they quizzed themselves when they studied, what could the most common answer be summarised as?

A

to judge how well the material has been learnt

24
Q

Many memory studies include a retention interval. What is a retention interval?

A

A period of time (interval) between the encoding and retrieval/test stages of a study.

25
Q

During retrieval practice, one possibility is that participants think of not just the correct answer, but also related answers. Which theory of the backward testing effect makes this prediction?

A

mediator effectiveness hypothesis

26
Q

What is proactive interference?

A

When memory for previously studied information interferes with the learning of new information

27
Q

Which theory of the backward testing effect suggests that retrieval practice is beneficial for memory because the cognitive processes required to self-test are similar to those required in the final test?

A

Transfer-appropriate processing (TAP)

28
Q

In studies of the backward testing effect, the test-delay interaction refers to the finding that _____?

A

relative to restudy, retrieval practice often impairs memory when tested after a short retention interval, but improves memory when tested after longer retention intervals.

29
Q

what was smith et al 2016 findings from his study into memory and stress

A

stress significantly impaired recall but only for the restudy group

30
Q

what is the fte

A

enhances learning of new material through prior testing aka test-potential new learning

31
Q

what was the objective of Szpunar 2008 study

A

to examine how interim testing influences the learning and recall of new material

32
Q

what is interim testing

A

taking a test between learning sessions

33
Q

what was the procedure of szpunar et al 2008 study (exp. 3)

A

Participants studied five lists of words sequentially:
After studying Lists 1-4, participants either:
Took a test on the material,
Completed a math distractor task, or
Restudied the material.
List 5 was studied and then immediately tested across all groups.

34
Q

what were the findings of szpunar et al 2008 study (exp. 3)?

A

Participants in the testing condition:
Showed improved learning and recall of List 5 compared to the other groups.
Had fewer intrusions (incorrectly recalling words from earlier lists), indicating less interference from previous material.
The improvement on List 5 recall was attributed to:
The forward testing effect: Testing facilitated better learning of new material.
Partial backward testing effect: Testing helped consolidate previous material.

35
Q

how does interim test enhance learning of subsequent material

A

by reducing proactive interference

36
Q

what does context change allow for

A

segregation of lists

37
Q

what does context change prevent

A

build up of proactive interference from one list or another

38
Q

what is the procedure of szpunar et al 2013 study?

A

Participants: Watched an online lecture split into 4 segments.
After the first 3 segments, participants were assigned to one of three groups:
Test Group: Took a short test on the material.
Restudy Group: Restudied the material.
Control Group: Did an unrelated (math) activity.
All groups were tested after the 4th segment.
ptsp were asked whether they’re mind-wandering once in each segment, experimenters looked at students notes from the video

39
Q

what were the findings of szpunar et al 2013 study?

A

interim testing benefits: improved learning and recall of the 4th segment, reduced mind-wandering during the lecture, increased note-taking

40
Q

summarise jing et al 2016 study into quality mind-wandering

A
  • undergraduates watched 40 min lecture with interim testing or restudy
    -ptsp asked “what are you thinking about” periodically during the lecture
  • mind wandering rates did NOT significantly differ between the 2 groups
  • BUT interim testing group did report more mind-wandering that was RELATED to the lecture than the restudy group
41
Q

summarise yang et al 2019

A
  • ptsp studied either face-name or Swahili-english pairs list1-3
  • all ptsp Studied face-name pairs list 4
  • interim testing improved final list 4 recall even when list 1-3 and 4 material type different
  • the forward testing effect is transferable to different stimulus
42
Q
A