Week 13 Flashcards

0
Q

Using average from a number of people improves reliability. Must be made independNtly.

A

But isn’t this validity? Once you have 3 judges, no longer reliability?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Intra vs inter subject reliability

A

Across people, VALIDITY, or interpersonal reliability,

Reliability is intrapesonal reliability.
Moods. Biases expectation influence it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Expectations effect

A

Order, Ppearance physical, prestige.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Use of screens?

A

Does help. Shoes sound, physical appearance, no judge women.
Live vs recorded no difference. but videos are usually rated higher!

Halo effect of rating sclaes!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rating form and score,

Rather consistancy

A

Form or score or combined, combined less reliable than either one individually.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rate entire, first half or quarter study.

A

No differences in the ratings!
First 15 second not the only important part.
Wrong, not juat the first quarter, unrealistic. Basil study.
Wapnick found an interaction.
Ratings after a minute were higher for good perofrmance, worse for worse perform.
But inverse for 20 second hearing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Judges idea, background and reliability. Fisk

A

Made no differences of judge background.

Except technique!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Non musical aspects

Particularly observable ones, physical appearance. Singers

A

Visual only,
Audio only
Video

Males, more attractive on vide
More attractive were better performers!

Stage behaviour

More attractive in video and audio.

School children
Free pianos and 3 yr perf.
Same results. , looks like a bias, takes shape early on.

Why?
More attractive people are treated differently.
Socioeconomic status.

4th study. 
Videos. 
Got no differences! In any condition. 
Expert performers all look great. 
Less good looking do not make it. Depressing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Computer eval perf?

A

Outperform one judge certainly.

Was as reliable as 7 judges, more reliable than one judge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Order of performance!

A

Strong vs weak, no support for idea. Finals in concertos there are order effect.
Winners likely to come from lTer performances. 456. Hmm, against self control studies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Beginning middle end, difference in rating.

A

Youtube.

Higher rated performers rating overall higher, of any four component parts. Difference great for concert artist.
Rating of a mature was lower than rating of any parts. 4 sections average of piece, never found.

Continuum, wide. In other words, play good!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Music therapy is digit ion

A

Goal oriented therapeutic process to help improve a patients life in a variety of domains (psychological, physical, emotional etc) using music as a facilitator.

A health care profession, therapeutic medium is music,
Developmental,
Adaptation, elderly dementia.
Rehabilitlytavie skill.s

Psychological, sensorimotor, cognitive,social.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

History,

Quality of research s weak.

A

Hihgly criticized beUse of this.

Apply psychological ways to help patients.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Use three main approach

A

Behavioural:
Skinner modify behaviour if you modify environment. Called conditioning, Pavlovian dogs.

Music could be used as a reinforcement. Leads to habituation though. Modeling modify behaviour. Used esp with children.

But is it better to use it as a teaching tool.
Great for phone numbers. As shown.
But who’s values are imparted?

Psychoanalytic:
Freud: many ppl question it.
Unconscious, preconscious, conscious, ry to resolved unresolved issues. 60-80’s creates experience to stimulate thoughts feelings, through improvization, a will patient and guided imagery so well. Try to transform those states. Nature of approach is vRy subjective. Need well trained psychoanalyst and music.

Humanistic.
Maslow pyramid. Needs.
Physiologic need to be met.
Looking at patients strengths and potential, rather than deficiencies. Improv, emphasis on interaction with enviro and people. Elderly video.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Use old songs with elderly breaks

A

Isolation,
Difficulty communicating, breaks isolation.

Songs encourage conversation.
Mid to advanced stage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Music therapy shift, social science into neuroscience.

A

Neuro scientific music therapy.
Ratio sizzled scientific mediating model.
1. Solid data on musical behaviour.
2. Solid data on brain
3. Compare both types of model, looking for complementary manner.
4. Do clinical research with lasting results.

Hard science

Sensory motor rehab
Brain Injury, effect of rhythm on motor facilitation. REMT? Parkinson’s iPod touch.

Speech language
Harmonious interval speaking voice.

Cognitive
ADHD, memory loss, training listen to different musciL components. Pitch timbre, tempo dynamic.

Pain
Used less meds if chose! Music they listened to.

16
Q

Amta definition.

A

Focus on rela therapist rela. Client.

Psychiatric
Children special needs.
Geriatric population,

Ted talk. Mt.