Week 11 Flashcards

0
Q

Aptitude and and achievement done and now onto the development of achievement.
Development of musical skills.

A

Domains of leRning. Needed 4
1. Affective domain (developed over time)
Subsumed by attitude rela. To rock music, young children open to music more than we think. This aspect we will gloss over.
2. Physical: vocal and motor.
Gesellschaft book. Normative landmarks book. High variation though.
3. Perceptual:
***Conceptual:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Watch performance adjudication podcast!

A

Adjudication specialty of Wapnick. Extraneous things.

Watch over next week.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pitch discrimination

A

Young kids have difficult following low high due to language,
Only 50% her
Between 6-9 make twice as much improvement the between 9-19
Loudness, kids are usually vRy good at loudness. Cuz told to be quiet. Get a lot of feedback in terms of loud or soft.

Centration,
Only able to focus on one thing at a time. So until only 8 or 9 child can only focus on melody or accomp, by 10 only get to hear the two togethor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Piaget did not use q

A

Experiments. Did everything through observation.
Cognitive theory of development.
Stage based theory.

We are focusing on conceptual

1) Sensorimotor (0-(18-24m))
Physical manipuLtion, contact and immediate senses.
Differentiation. PickVoo they really are surprised.
2) pre-operational 2-7y
There are critical points, therefore not gradual. Great variability between people and subjects.
Syllogistic
All boys are stupid,
George is a boy
All boys are stupid.

If you cannot do this, implies centration.

3) Concrete operational 7-11
4) Formal operations. 11-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Conservation eg.

A

Saw video. No ever seal of operations!

Conservation is whe a child can conserve quantity, characteristic of proper atonal stage.

Applied to music. Like transposition, is it the same, or metrical groupings. Augmentation diminution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Isomorphism.

A

Information retained whe something is varied.
If something varies, it has enough info, to reconstruct the original.

Eg. Conservation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conservation of meldoy and rhythm.

A

8 are much better than 5 year olds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Analogy:

A is to B as C is to D

A

Kids under 2 cannot do this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

GeneralizTion. On basis of behViur. Making assumptions.

A

Deductions,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Abstract reasoning, Analogy, generalization transfer, (one sit. Learned applied to another)

A

Cognitive abilities. That adults can do and kids cannot.

Not gradual by qualitative way of thinking over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Concrete vs abstract reasoning,

A

What is said by outside source, using logic vs experience.

Set of facts, go beyond experience and abstract, reason it out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Music performance anxiety. Now.

A

1 in 4 suffer from it regarding it as serious, 1 in 6 see it as severe problem. Could be due to stigma at time.

It’s a syndrome, many type of symptoms.

Physiological cold hot hands, dry mouth
Behavioural: shaking,
Cognitive:
Affective: ? Not mentioned.

How does it develop.

Children as young sans 3/4 apparently can develop it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does it develop. MPA THAT IS

A
Classical conditioning. Pavlov dogs. 
Ucs
(Unconditioned stimulus) 
Meat, 
Ucr, is salivation 

Cs cr
Pair bell just before meat is presented.

For MPA. Next time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MPA is a significant problem and is a syndrome

So physiologic, behavioural, cognitive. Review and now why do we have anxiety, ?

A

To run away from danger.

Small amount of anxiety seems to result in a better performer acne,

But in terms of interference, memorization and fine finger coordination, speed up but irregular. Less dynamic contrast.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Theories of map development

A

Pavlov thing
USC ucr
Cs cr

Meat salivation
Bell salivation. 
For musicians need third level
Ucs---ucr
Pain.  Fear

Cs————————————–cr
Negative eval. Far or anx.
Perforamcne sit. Fear.
Pain, as neg leads to perform sit feel fear.
So performing sit. Elicits fear response. Pavlov explanation of MPA.

Other idea.

Cognitive distortion, reality distorted.
Thought processes lead to fear.negative self talk all rela to moa. But they are really irrational. Ca be generalized to other perforamcne domains, more positive thoughts, less MPA.

Models above are not mutually exclusive, could result from either or both.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

No one thing can do deal with MPA.
Folk remedies are non researched ones. Banana,

More you invest in a performance, more anxious you feel. More feel have to lose.

Researched methods.

A

Beta-blockers.
Inhibits bet-response of relea e of adrenaline. Does not influence thoughts, potential tertiary benefit could be this, drugs were really effective, maybe more with violin bow arm tremor. Popular,
Risks: need a prescription. Asthmatic issue, affects heart. Dose too. Diabetes too. Side effects for 10% include nausea or mild depression. Don’t like absence of physical arousal.
Ethical issues.

Systematic desensitization:
Wkenn conditined stimulus response change.
Cs. Perforamnce leads to Anx (instead try incompatible training OR RECIPRICAL INHIBITION) like relaxation. PMR.
1) relax, reciprocal inhibition
2) counter conditioning, come up with anxiety hierarchy.
List of statements, minimally anxiety evoking to highly anxiety evoking. Stays relaxed hearing anxiety provoking script ion, or done in vivo. Taping. This apropHc works! Leas to performance sit. And feel relax. HAS A THEORITCAL BASIS.

Implosive (flooding) therapy
Perforamnce disaster over and over again.
Ucs. Ucr
Cs. Cr

Deals with ucs changes to Cs. Extinction of a response.
Facing fears. Desensitization. Faster than rhe above, effective. But not used much with music.

Biofeedback. Muscle tensions and heart rate, brink what is thought as involuntary control into self control. Physiological greater power. Good technique, JAW visual or auditory or
NEUROFEEDBACK. ALPHA-theta combo. Extremely effective. ,
Theta is almost asleep. Shown to generalize.

Non Pavlovian. Side. Cognitive restructuring.
Greene, think more about music, shift thoughts. Research is questionable.
Rational emotive therapy. Argue with musiciN.