Week 10 Pm Flashcards
How to get kids to like classical music.
Repeated hearings
Research shows this is true to a certain degree. Spaced presentations tends not to get saturation. Contemporary classical music is preferred actually to order by kids on average.
Reinforcement. Praise music
Will a say they like in presence of teacher, not a lasting effect, long term.
MGnitude of enforcement. Liveliness.
Study, monotone vs charismatic, introverted vs extroverted presence.
Dependant measure perforamce and attitude. Liking conductor. Prefer high magnitude for liking. But performances had no dif.
Preference research
Actual specific behaviour in choice.
Focus on classical music. And kids, m.ed rela.
Listening readiness (Just realized this course is for me majors doh, hence the focus on that aspect a bit. Hmm missing some elements I think, oh well.)
Systems , that are gradual approaches.
Research shows young children are quite responsive to complex music. Much more open to contemporary and unusual music.
Listening readiness should probably be modified.
Pop music is way more popular. No way to compete.
Tests
Important part of lives, can lead to anxiety.
Tests and measurements
Aptitude tets and achievement tests. Define
Aptitidue:
Capacity (“potential” =genetic+maturation (occurs without overtraining) and environmental influences outside of formal education.
Are online,
Are not immune to training though e think they are.
Ex. Sat, iq, musical ability. Defy’s precise definition.
Achievement = attainment
Deals with what you have done, a measurement. Most are achievement based. Talent: speed of learning, learn quickly.
Musicality: sensitivity to the musical stimulus. Notice a lot of things. Play with fitness and detail.
Standardized test vs teacher made test.
Distinction between ap test and standardized test.
Standardized test, given to thousands of people, to get norms, bell curve, most score in middle. Iq 100. Usually for ap tests. Compare to averages and standards.
Most achievement tests are not standardized.
Polarity between aptitude ap and achievement q
Genetics vs enviro
Born made,
Nature nurture.
Aptitude different from height or weight
Ap tests are not physical, that’s the major dif.
Is somewhat made up, and there are diff ultures in definition. Circularity,
and the fact whether aptitude is general vs atomistic, **
Gardner thinks intelligence is atomistic,
Theory of multiple intelligences. ,
Musical, logical, spacial, language, kinesthetic. Interpersonal, intrapesonal. Naturalistic
Other aptitude test music aptitude profile used actual instruments.
Much longer and quite different from test we did.
Seashore has its advantages cuz it’s the one we did, shorter,
Arthur Jensen
Controversial. Culture.
Invalid study. Culture bound, not culture free. Seashore might be more culture free. To encourage musical people
But these tests can discourage people.
Davies aptitude test mentioned.
Doubt imp. I hope. Sai it was a brief tangent cuz it was neat and smart. Only one sweep frequency catches note. Like tuning. Pitch discrimination. Future of aptitude test questionable but interesting aspect of PSYC of music
Achievement tests
Colewell. Longer than aptitude.
So many more things to test for knowledge now, categories infinite concepts.
No longer just basic things, common to all.
Wapcom perforamcne sight reading standardized achievement test.
Silver elementary competency tests.
Tests have issue of competition! IMO
Educational though, good integration and well made interesting.
Unless iq really low, not rela to musician or intelligence.
Children high iq are appropriate for chronological age
Mauical aptitude no special case.
Idiot savant
Savant is a scholar.
Moron, imbecile and idiot. Lol. Really good in. Only 1 thing.
Average iq 100
Below 50 was idiot.
