W6 Readings: B&B Ch. 11,12 Flashcards

0
Q

anchors

A

comparison points or points of reference. Lie at the center of the latitude of acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

assimilation

A

the position advocated in a message is incorrectly perceived as being nearer to that of the audience than it is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

contrast

A

the position advocated in a message is incorrectly perceived to be further from that of the audience than it is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

curvilinear

A

evolution pattern in which, as one variable (discrepancy between message and audience’s attitude) gets larger, another variable (amt. of attitude change) first gets larger, then smaller.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

discrepancy

A

the difference between the position advocated in a message and the listener’s attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

discrepant

A

the position advocated in a message is different than the listener’s attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

discrepant

A

the position advocated in a message is different from the listener’s attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

involvement

A

relevance or importance of a topic to a listener

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

latitude of acceptance

A

the range of message positions that are acceptable or plausible for an audience member

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

latitude of non-commitment

A

the range of message positions that an audience member neither accepts nor rejects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

latitude of rejection

A

the range of message positions that a listener actively rejects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2 components of Social Judgment/Involvement Theory that make it unique among consistency theories

A

1) listener judges how much the message agrees or disagrees with his/her own attitude
2) listener’s involvement in the topic of the persuasive message is an important factor in attitude change

reinforces the importance of the audience in persuasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the three latitudes of SJ/I Theory?

A

acceptance, non-commitment, rejection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 2 processes of perceptual errors in the SJ/I Theory?

A

assimilation, contrast

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

SJ/I theory predicts that the greater the difference between the message and the listener’s existing attitude, the greater/lesser the persuasion

A

greater (to a certain point)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

more assimilation generally = more/less attitude change

A

less, because the message is already near the person’s attitude regarding the topic and they have less cause to change his/her attitude

16
Q

listeners who are less involved in a topic will have wider/narrower latitudes of acceptance and wider/narrower latitudes of non-commitment than those who are highly involved.

A

wider; narrower

17
Q

SJ/I theory predicts a ____ relationship between discrepancy and attitude change

A

curvilinear: as discrepancy increases, attitude change first increases then decreases

18
Q

SJ/I theory helps to explain the role of perception in persuasion, ignores message content

A

:)

19
Q

attitude toward behavior

A

degree to which the behavior is viewed as favorable or unfavorable

20
Q

behavioral intention

A

what a person would like to do, or plans to do

21
Q

belief strength

A

belief, potentially verifiable cognition (“facts”)

22
Q

evaluation

A

value, judgment of something’s worth

23
Q

motivation to comply

A

the extent to which a person thinks it is important to comply with the others’ norms or expectations

24
Q

normative beliefs

A

what a person believes the others want or expect that person to do

25
Q

perceived behavioral control

A

the extent to which a person believes that he or she can perform desired behavior

26
Q

subjective norms

A

the extent to which a person is aware of the expectations of others and is prepared to comply

27
Q

Theory of Reasoned Action predicts that behavioral intent is shaped by 2 factors:

A

1) our attitude toward the behavior

2) subjective norms

28
Q

2 components of attitude toward behavior

A

1) belief strength

2) evaluation (judgments of worth)

29
Q

2 components of subjective norms

A

1) normative beliefs (what I believe others want me to do)

2) motivation to comply (to what others want me to do)

30
Q

see Fig. 12.1 of Theory of Reasoned Action p. 194

A

:)

31
Q

6 ways to change the attitude toward a behavior

A

1) strengthen the belief strength of an attitude which supports your persuasive goal
2) strengthen the evaluation of an attitude which supports your persuasive goal
3) weaken the belief strength of an attitude that opposes your persuasive goal
4) weaken the evaluation of an attitude that opposes your persuasive goal
5) create new attitude with a belief strength and evaluation which supports your persuasive goal
6) remind our audience of a forgotten attitude with a belief strength and evaluation which supports your persuasive goal

32
Q

6 ways to change subjective norms

A

1) strengthen a normative belief which supports your persuasive goal
2) increase the motivation to comply with a norm which supports your persuasive goal
3) weaken a normative belief which opposes your persuasive goal
4) weaken a motivation to comply with a norm which opposes your persuasive goal
5) create a new subjective norm which supports your persuasive goal
6) remind the audience of a forgotten subjective norm which supports your persuasive goal

33
Q

Reason Action adds what new variable between attitudes (and norms) and behavior?

A

behavioral intent

34
Q

T or F: behavioral intent and behavior must be measured at the same time for us to expect that they will relate

A

T

35
Q

Main thesis of Theory of Reasoned Action

A

behavioral intent can be fairly accurately predicted from attitudes toward behavior and subjective norms

36
Q

limitation of Theory of RA compared to consistency theories and SJ/I

A

it doesn’t address other aspects of content (besides beliefs, values, and norms)

37
Q

How is Reasoned action useful to persuaders?

A
  • can help you decide which ideas to use or what arguments to make in your speech
  • helps identify many options for creating attitude change
  • helps us understand the relationship between attitude toward behavior and the behavior itself