Voluntary Intoxication A03 Flashcards
+P1: fallback principle
public policy - R v Lipman
+DP1: ensures convictions,
specific intent crimes morally worse
-WDP1: fallback principle inconsistent
not all crimes have corresponding BI crime
-P2: DPP v Beard controversial
vol intox used to be aggravating
-DP2: criticised
vol intox is the root of many violent offences
-WDP2: excessive drinking encouraged
burden on the NHS
-P3: R v Heard
wording of act ignored, loophole
-DP3: issues with distinction between SI and BI
needs reform
+WDP: R v Heard
public policy
-P4: DPP v Majewski - problematic
undermines contemporaneity
-DP4: goes against LP of recklessness R v Cunnigham
df arguably doesn’t see the risk at the time of intox
+WDP4: R v Richardson & Irwin
clarified the law