Self Defence A03 Flashcards
-P1: all or nothing unfair on df
R v Martin
-DP1: all or nothing doesn’t account for ______
the reality of violent situations
-WDP1: inconsistency with _________
LoC
+P2: R v Beckford
public policy
+DP2: pre-emptive strikes
justified = fair
-WDP2: jury might struggle assessing __________
if mistakes are honest or reasonable
+P3: ensures mental ill people ______
cannot escape liability
+DP3: would rather df have DR
so they would get access to rehab treatment
-WDP3: law fails to protect _________
vulnerable defendants
-P4: R v Bird
encourages vigilante justice
-DP4: too lenient
allows initial aggressors to be treated like victim - R v Rashford
+WDP4: recognises df’s instinctive __________
duty to protect yourself, favours defendants