Vigilantism Flashcards
What are the key readings?
Who defined vigilantism?
Sederberg 1978
What is vigilantism?
Vigilantism is a desire to preserve social stability in the face of behaviour which deviates from social norms
What are the emotional reactions to crime?
Anger
Feeling the need to retaliate against criminals but is rare
What is the 1988 Israeli study?
Over one quarter of the males surveyed reported that they had engaged in some form of vigilante action (with over 6% admitting to having taken part in violent vigilante acts either against people or property).
What did Johnson (1996) say?
There is no empirical research on the topic in the UK, while in the USA the quantity of research is small and its quality patchy
What did a survey say about guns?
Adults use guns for ‘protective purposes’ in the States over 2.5 million times each year. This is a figure nearly five times higher than the actual number of crimes committed with guns.
Who looked at potential victims?
Kovandzic et al 1998
What did Kovandzic (1998) find?
Annually, potential victims of crime kill between 1,400 and 3,200 criminals and injure a further 7,700 - 18,500
Why do people not intervene or respond to a criminal act?
Diffusion of responsibility effect
What is the Kitty Genovese case?
Was attacked outside the apartment building she lived in
38 witnesses but no-one intervened
Who looked at bystander intervention?
Shotland & Straw (1976)
What did Shotland & Straw (1976) find?
Less than a third of people who witnessed the event intervened to assist a woman who was being assaulted by a male attacker.
Of those who did intervene, the typical response was to approach the struggle slowly but in plain view in the hope and expectation that the attacker would take flight.
Only two individuals (out of a total of 41) rushed immediately and directly to help the victim.
Significantly both of these individuals had received unarmed combat training and both reported afterwards that they felt they could handle the situation.
What did Huston et al do?
interviewed people who had directly intervened in a criminal episode, were injured as a result and later received compensation for their injury.
What did Huston et al find?
Interveners:
had witnessed considerably more crime in the years prior to the incident
were more likely to have been personally victimised themselves
more likely to have been trained in police work, first-aid techniques
were physically larger than the controls.
What did Shotland & Stebbins (1980) find?
78% of the people who directly intervened were trained in self-defence techniques or boxing.