Types of experiments Flashcards
Describe and Evaluate Laboratory study
Conducted in controlled, unnatural, laboratory environment
(Sperling 1960, Milgram 1963, Peterson and Peterson 1959 used trigrams, Miller used digit span, Baddeley 1991, dual-task experiments)
Advantages
* High internal validity- Controls EV’s which proves cause and effect of IV and DV
* Can precisely manipulate IV and measure DV due to control, high internal validity.
* Can be easily replicated due to standardised procedure , results in high reliability
Disadvantages
* Lacks Ecological validity due to artificial setting
* Lacks mundane realism which reduces external validity
* Could lead to demand characteristics which could reduce internal validity.
Describe and Evaluate Natural experiment
Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988) studied cross-cultural variation in attachment style (DV). They didn’t control the upbringing of the children (IV), this occurred naturally.
Clinical drug treatment experiments
Advantages
* People behave more naturally because they are generally unaware of the experiment.
Demand characteristics are avoided.
* Aspects of behaviour affected by the IV that would be too impractical or unethical to manipulate can be studied
Disadvantages
* Findings can be difficult to interpret.
* Differences between groups may be increased due to individual differences than the effect of the IV.
* Less or no control over extraneous or confounding variables
* Cause and effect is more difficult to establish.
* Ethical issues (e.g. no informed consent)
Describe and Evaluate Field Experiment
IV manipulated in natural environment’
Sherif (1960)
Bickman
Hofling
Advantages
* High ecological validity.
* There is control over the IV.
* Reduction of demand characteristics.
Disadvantages
* Can be more time consuming.
* Random allocations to experimental and control groups is extremely difficult.
* Much less control over extraneous variables, reduced internal validity.
* Cause and effect is less certain.
* Ethical issues (e.g. no informed consent, right to withdraw and debriefing).
* There is limited ability for replication.
Describe and justify pilot studies
- The term ‘pilot studies’ refers to mini versions of a full-scale study (also called ‘feasibility’ studies), as well as the specific pre-testing of a particular research instrument such as a questionnaire or interview schedule.
- It avoids wasting time and resources which may be spent getting inaccurate results .
- Increases the validity of later research projects if conducted properly as anomalies and problems can be resolved.
- It allows the researcher to determine the most appropriate design and method of data collection to test the hypothesis