Trade Unions - timeline of events leading to the general strike Flashcards
How did the govt use the 9 month restbite
- the govt used the 9 month respite to effectively organise counter-strike measures overseen by the STC:
- resources were stockpiled and local networks of volunteers were established
- The Economic League, and the Organisation for the Maintenance of Supplies (OMS) both recruited middle and upper class volunteers to keep public services running in the event of a strike
- By February 1926 the government believed it was ready to face a general strike, and troops were deployed to sensitive areas
How did the TUC use the restbite
- The TUC however was completely inactive -
- the unions even temporarily refused to grant powers to the General Council to call an all-out strike and conduct negotiations.
- Clearly there was still a lack of trust, especially after Black Friday.
- trade unions were reluctant to prepare for a conflict which they did not want and believed they could not win
- James Thomas, who chaired the TUC committee dealing with the issue, believed the government would seek a peaceful solution and try to avoid a strike
With the …………. due to run out on 1 May 1926, mine owners began to issue notices of …………
With the government subsidy due to run out on 1 May 1926, mine owners began to issue notices of new, lower wage rates
Both the …………&……… rejected the findings of the Samuel Commission
Both the miners’ union (MFGB) and the mine owners rejected the findings of the Samuel Commission
What was the Samuel Commission
- Samuel Commission - set up by PM Baldwin in July 1925, to provide a long-term solution to the crisis in the coal industry:
- temporary reduction of wage levels by 13.5%
- the end of the govt subsidy
- the amalgamation of smaller mines
- national wage agreements
- & the sharing of profits between miners and owners
How did the TUC act in the time following the Samuel Commission’s recomendations
- At this stage the TUC called for continued negotiations based upon the Commission’s recommendations
What can be seen as the trigger for strike action initially in 1926
- This impasse between the two sides was evident when owners locked out miners on April 29th 1926 who refused to accept wage reductions of between 10 and 25%
- The TUC, now with the power to coordinate strike action, responded by calling on unions to unite
When was the call for a general strike first made
- first made in response to the OMS who widely distributed posters looking for recruits
- In response, on May 1st 1926 the TUC voted for a general strike in sympathy of the miners to begin on May 3rd 1926
Why did Baldwin’s government stop mehotiations with the TUC
- Next Stanley Baldwin’s government stopped negotiating with the TUC when print workers refused to print a pro-government editorial in the Daily Mail which labelled the miners as ‘revolutionary’
- The government saw this as an attack by the unions on freedom of the press and a clearly political decision, not one caused by industrial dispute with employers
- Although the TUC apologised for the Daily Mail, the negotiations ended and a general strike was called to start on 4th May 1926
How did the General Strike become unavoidable
- Baldwin, under pressure from anti-trade union Conservatives, was unable to back down and repeat the embarrassment of Red Friday;
- equally the TUC could not climb down and risk a repeat of Black Friday
- This made the General Strike became unavoidable
Why is the scale of the strike impressive
- The TUC had no concrete plans on how to support the miners should a strike be necessary
- Despite this, when the strike was called on 4th May 1926, they still managed to call out over 1.5 millions workers - in addition to the million miners
- What occurred was therefore a large-scale nine-day general strike in which workers in many trades across Britain went on strike in support of the miners
What was impressive about the solidarity shown, and the slight discrepancy
- This solidarity among workers in other industries was impressive
- Ernest Bevin and the Strike Organising Committee took charge of the distribution of food and maintenance of health services
- There was a huge variance in the effectiveness of local strike committees