Topic 3 - Social cognition & Perception Flashcards
Social cognition
Social cognition is the unconscious mental thought process of how we think of our complex social world
Social perception
is the way we try to understand people, cause-and-effect, why people do what they do and make *attributions based. It is how we *specifically explain why people behave how they behave
[cognition processes to help in our automatic processing]
heuristic
Cognitive shortcuts where we apply basic rules when deciding something or making a judgement (reduce mental effort, fast and frugal, attribute substitution)
- Representativeness: compare aspects of the individual to mental prototype examples
Bias: ignores base rates and contrary information - Availability: the easier one thinks of it, like quickly remembering
Bias: self relevant information is more easily and frequently available - Anchoring & adjustments: influenced by the first bit of information we hear/learn
Bias: adjustments aren’t enough to override the impact of the anchor - Status quo: the current is good, feels if things change they mights lose status quo
Bias: new things/change can be better
[cognition processes to help in our automatic processing]
- Schemas
Mental representation (connected thoughts/attitudes/beliefs) of a part of the social world. Cognitive framework and concept.
- Person schema: appearance, personality, preferences, behavior
- Role schema: roles, doctors, prostitutes, government, police, knowledge annd structure about role occupants
- Script (event) schema: professionalism, handshake, business suit, portfolio, how an event should unfold
- Content-free schemas: based on rules or attributing a cause to an individual’s behaviour, rules for processing information
- Self schema: future job, hates broccoli, smart, brat, knowledge about ourselves
[cognition processes to help in our automatic processing]
3.Biases: It’s hard to change schemas once we have them that is due to…?
1) Our limited information
2) Self-fulfilling/perpetuating beliefs
Schemas influence our..?
1) Attention- what we notice
2) Encoding- what information we store
3) Retrieval- how we recover information to use it
internal attribution
from the person’s own traits, motives, beliefs, attitudes, values and intentions
external attributions
from different things in the person’s world, environment and situation
How we explain and apply our attributions to a behaviour
Consensus: do other people react the same way
Consistency: does the person react like this all the time
Distinctiveness: do they react the same way to different situations
Controllability: how controllable are the causal factors? Can an individual change the causal factors?
Stability: how stable are the causal factors overtime? Does the factors change or stay the same?
schemas
a mental representation that represents attitudes and beliefs of a certain stimulus / concept / relations
prototypes
categorization based on similarity of object to the prototype of a category
exemplars
categorization based on total similarity of object to exemplars of the category versus total similarity
stereotypes
a schema applied to a social group and its members
2 attributional biases
- Actor-observer effect:
We tend to make internal attributions for other people’s behaviours BUT we tend to make external attributions for our own behaviour
Why?
- We focus on the person than the situation when observing a behavior
- assuming a person’s behavior reflects his/her internal characteristics
- we are aware of external factors when it comes to our behavior
Self-serving biases
When we have positive outcomes (or do positive behaviours), we attribute it to internal causes BUT…. When we have negative outcomes (or do negative behaviours), we attribute it to external causes
Why?
- we expect to succeed in life
- we want to feel good
Cognitive consistency
People are uncomfortable when their thoughts are contradictory, and engage in all manner of behaviours and rationalisation to resolve the inconsistency
Naive scientists
characterising people as having a need to attribute causes to behaviours to render the world a meaningful place
Attribution
The process of attributing a cause to our own behaviour, and that of others
Cognitive misers
describes the ability and tendency of the human brain to problem solve in the most simple and straight-forward ways rather than utilizing more sophisticated and effort-intensive ways. By doing this the brain conserves energy.
Motivated tactician
A model of social cognition that characterises people as having multiple cognitive strategies available, which they choose among on the basis of personal goals, motives and needs
Social neurosciences
The exploration of the neurological underpinnings of the processes
traditionally examined by social psychology. Increased
- fMRI
- neural activity in specific areas
Affect-infusion model
cognition is infused with affect such that social judgements reflects current mood.
to prevent:
- think longer
- actively elaborate the details
Appraisals leading to emotional responses
Smith & lazarus, 1990
Primary appraisals: whether a stressor poses a threat to own needs and goals
secondary appraisals: individuals evaluation of resources and coping strategies, ‘am I responsible?’