Topic 2: Legal Concerns and Insurance Issues Flashcards
What is an act of malfeasance?
Starting to go beyond scope of practice as an athletic therapist
What is liability?
State of being legally responsible for the harm one causes to another person
What must an A.T. have for protection for liability
Liability insurance or malpractice insurance
What is scope of practice?
Duties and responsibilities that A.T.’s are allowed to perform
What is minimum standard of care?
Minimum reasonable care that is owed to an athlete
Why do A.T. s have to follow the rules and guidelines of scope of practice and minimum standard of care?
To keep themselves and patients safe and aren’t negligent in any way
When does negligence happen?
- Failure to use ordinary or reasonable care
- failure to perform legal duties
- AT practice would normally be tried under tort law
What is torts?
Legal wrongs committed against a person (a civil wrong done to an individual)
If an at does something incorrectly and that person has become injured in some way, what may the person do?
Sue the A.T. under tort law (different from criminal law)
What can torts start from?
Nonfeasance (NOT acting): fail to perform legal duty lie, failure to refer to a professional who has the needed expertise).
Malfeasance (not allowed): performs action that is not his/hers to legally perform (ie. Perform advanced treatment leading to complications.)
Misfeasance (MIS acting): performs an action incorrectly that he/she has the legal right to do.
Gross negligence: total disregard for the safety of others
Vicarious negligence: if a staff member of yours performs an act of malfeasance
Other lawsuit reasons:
- people are more aware of legal rights and less willing to accept incompetence
- publicity about large awards
- public is less hesitant to take complaints to court
- people assume insurance companies have an unending compacity to pay
To prove negligence (to prove that something wrong occurred)
Must show that:
- a duty of care was owed to the athlete
- a breach of the standard care was committed
- an injury resulted
- the injury was a direct result of the breach of standard of care
ALL FOUR MUST BE PROVEN
How to prove AGAINST negligence
Must show that:
- proper standard of care was taken and thus, no breach of duty
- injury was an unavoidable accident or “Act of God”
- Injured party involved in contributory negligence (person did something to contribute to their injury)
- athlete was aware of the assumption of risk
ONLY ONE MUST BE PROVEN
What is assumption of risk?
- athlete is aware of inherent risks but decides to continue participating
- expressed in written waiver or implied from conduct of athlete
- can be used as defense against an individual’s negligence suit
what is sovereign immunity?
- where neither government or government employees can be held accountable for negligence