topic 1 readings + case studies Flashcards
tcherkezoff; what, when where
first contacts in polynesia; studied hawaiian traditions and cook in 2004
hawaiian traditions
- chief on an island; warns of arrival of europeans (there are different interpretations in different islands of europeans)
- lono= never before encountered people
maori traditions
newcomers are tupua or atua
tupua= visible beings of supernatural origin regarded with a mix of terror or awe and are given offerings
atua= god or being of supernatural origin
Eldon Best: forigeiners [europeans] are atua
“europeans are tupua but not OUR tupua’; distinction between gods, spirits and ancestors (tupua vs. tupuna)
maori and cook; linguistic confusion
maori + cook: cook says he is an astronomer ‘looking at stars”
maori: think this means he is a celestial being
thomas hylannd-eriksen
‘comparison and context’ 2010
culture carries ambiguity; humans equally cultural but with different systems
claude levi strauss and aim of anthropology?
‘anthropology has humanity as its objects of research, but studies divere manifestations’
- anthropology aims to understands connections in existence within, and between soecities
- context is important
geertzian concept
culture is an integrated whole
e. g. economics; drives globalization
e. g. cultural concepts; drive political explotation
cultural relavitism
societies/cultures are qualitavely different with own, unique inner lenses
- ethical principle and methological conept that excluses favouritivism and prferrism
- rejects ethnocentrisim and western centered models/concepts
william arens.. wrote?
‘the man eating myth’ 1979
aim of arens book
debunk mythologies of cannibalism as an accepted, ritual practice;
- show its a racist concept
- arens already bias of cannivalism (hence is bias); believes its seen as a unviersal anti-social and immoral behavoiur; only ever actually seen as a surivival act
another word for cannibalism is
anthropophagy
examples of ‘alleged’ notions of cannibalism
- herodotus
- tanzania and uganda
- jerome gibbons
- hans staden
- polynesia ta’unaga
herodotus belief + arens critique
said scynthians were ‘only people that eat human flesh’
arens:
herodotus as first recorder of other cultures enjoyed telling people of the unkwon and faraway people as barbaric; to create ‘dramatic narrative’
tanzania/uganda case + arens critique
tanzania (1968) called europeans blod suckers, who ate blood in ‘pills’
(uganda 1970); africans believed europeans ‘ate babies’ according to Middle ton
arens: stories of ‘blood suckers’ in africa as a result of british wwii blood drives (seen as colonial and political symbol of europeans consuming african vitality)
shows racist double standard onto africans:
- africans ignorant for thinkinng europeans cannivals
- europeans also think africans ignorant for being themselves uncivillized and cannivalistic
jerome gibbons case + arens critique
- gibbons; ‘scots of pre-christian england delight in the tase of human flesh’… ‘but i say this only with undersatnding i have no witness’
- cultural post-image of non-western societies
- influenced by 19th century evolutionary social theory which was attached to ‘others’; historic image of ‘primitive man’
hans staden case + arens critique
hans staden; said he was captured by Tupinamba Indians Islands in South America (1550s)
- said he saw them eat flesh as ritual process
arens critique:
a. detailed story but stadens wasn’t captured long enough
b. portrayed women as main cannibalist; sexist understood of female inferiority as savage
c. he claims Tupinambas were intellectually inferior, depsite himself not speaking the language, claims to have had detailed conversation with them and claims they have their own language [contradictions]
polynesian ta’unaga case + arens critique
19th century; ta’unga visited polynesia as a christian evangelist missionary
a. writes accounts of cannivalism as daily event
b. says savages fight for human meat
c. demonizes women as main cannibalistic enthusiasts
arens critique/analysis:
- tu’unga wants to portray self as a saviour sent to save and civillize islands with western superiority
- plays on readers emotions to instill feer; ‘londoners are like food to them’
- has linguistic fallacies; claims to report and interview islanders but himself was also ntoa ble to prevent a cannibalist child trial due to misscominuication?