gender and sexuality cases and readings Flashcards
chandra mohanty aim
1988: feminist scholarship and colonial disrouces;
how colonization and hegemoic white women create a cultural discource around the ‘third world woman’
aim: to analzye the production of this monolithic third world women in wetsern femist texts and look at the effects and representation to the ‘the other’
women vs woman (mohanty)
women; real subjects of collective histories
woman; priviliege ethnocentrisim is universal in western outcome; production of a third world ‘woman’ is appropoation and generalization
- ‘western women’ analyze ‘non western women’ as victims, relations of power, struggle adn assumptions of a universal partriarchal framework
analyzed texts of mohanty
zed press women int the third world
points of mohanty
- assumption of women as universal and coherent group
- third world women is base don femined gender and seen as poor/ignorant/tradition/religion
- western women as self-resperseetation of modern fierce and sexual control
- women categrogies as a singular group of SHARED oprression and sameless; homogenous ‘powerless’ group without agency
- women as must analyzed within ther cultural contexts (motherhood vs mothering)
frans hosken (mohanty)
- focuses on human rights and female genital mutiliation
- goal to ‘mutiliate sexual pleasure’
male sexual politics= rape
women as systematic victims of male control
women as objects and men as biolent subjects; creates opposstion
beverly lindsay (mohany)
shared dependences of third world woman;
‘victim status’ of ‘vietmanesse AND black woman’
universal grouping of powerlessness
does nto look at historical and political roles of wome in respecitives environments
assumes seuxal political sobuejcts prior to analysis
women in zambia (cutrufelli)
the ‘bemba’ marriage ritual
multi-stage event: a matrillineal society
- man marries into family
- girl goes through sexual intitation period in puberty; after this period man can obtain legal rights over qomen
cutrufelli; colonilization disrupts this by allowing men to ‘buy/take away’ woman from her people
mohanty critique; not true; there is a political difference between pre and post intitiated girl; different values assosiated with each bemba woman (not a united grouo of ‘women)
minnies
islam oprresses aran and muslim victim identitally; a singular patricarahal system that equally affects women
mohanty crituque;
- implies women exist outside of histor
- implies islam is ahomogenous ideology seperate form social relationships
e.g. ‘purdah’ (hiding of women) in pirzada; provides stability and personal securty
development policies (mohanty)
perdita huston says that development policies should be aimed at economic development by giving women ‘training’
mohanty critque;
- different social structures; assumed women have same social class and role (cant assume rural and urban women have same needs and desires)
- policies cant be gender based as women different by history, class and race, etc
example of a good analysis (according to mohanty) of women
Maria Mies 1982 Narsapur India:
looked at the housewife production of lace dollies in world market
a. ideology of a housewife; don’t leave home and their lace making seen as leisure (despite being aprt of global market)
b. hosuewife sdont want to leave home and look down but also jealous of working, ‘less respesctable’ women; shows cracks and contradictions in ideolgoy in this hierarchy
methods of female opprression
- ‘univeralism’ as proof (veil; sexual segregation verywhere)
- reproduction, sexual division of labour and family= is not a historical cultural and local process
- metholodical values of women being nature and men being culture
‘veiling’ meaning variation histo-cultural
iranian middle class in 1979; during revolution wore veils to support female working class
modern iranian woman; veil due to iranian institional mandate
housewife meaning variation histo-cultural
in US; woman as ‘head’ of household as indepednence and progress
in latin america; out of economic neccessite
‘feminziation of poverty’
mohanty and binaries
- creaiton of male and female binaries is explotiive and power dynamics (i.e. women powerless, men powerful)
creates a dichotomy between east and west
farha ghannam argument
2013; gender dynamics in urban egypt
studies masculinity in AL-Zawyia al-Hamra
argument: masculinity is a collective project by public and community
)male body as social product and social producers
women and male portryal in middle east
women:
- are over-embodied in western media and victimized
- focus on their body, nature secrecy (hijab)
men:
- under-embodied in western media as oppresive, dehumanized
- masculinity just assumed and that they arent affected by sociocultural constructs and realities
masculine trajectory
process of becoming a man
- fashioned by expectations
- interplay of individual and collective
- quest for social reconigiotn
hegemonic masculinity
process and pattern of allowing for male dominance over women