anthropology + primitive Flashcards
western enlightnment
17-18th century
sociopyschological unit of humanity in rational nature
» humans subject to laws of pgoress of nature and itself
- from begginging of time aim is to improve;
resulted in EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY
evolutionary anthro
human society; dynamic movement by evolution from lower to higher civillization (in lin ewith gods laws and nature)
savage societies—> civillized societies
truer knowledge-> superior technology -> control over nature –> finer arts —> truer religion
stages of human society
Economic:
hunter gatherer - pastoralist - agricultralist- slavery-feudalism-industrial capitalism/socialism/communism- end of human history
social;
primitive promisciuty to polygamy to matriniliny to patriniliny
evolutionary image of primitive humanity
- human (not homo monstrous)
- savage/british (biolent aggresive and immoral, eogistic) and underveloped (technology and politics and religion)
- sexually controlled (primitive promisciuty)
- instinct and reflexible yaware (only more or less aware of rules and norms)
- rough assembly, social structure
famous evoluitonary anthopologists
edwardy tylor
lewis henry moran
- built on ‘scientific findings’
- little ethnography; ‘army chair field work ‘
- speculated evolutionary schemas on datter
signs of evolutionayr anthropology
framed 19th century political and intellectual views:
- musuems of ‘human social evolution condition’
- justification of colonialism on basis of social darwinism
- justification of social reforms to ‘improve’ poor and ensalved
change of evolutionary anthropology?
moved away from evolutionary anthropology in 20th century
omai
1768 and 1774:
‘individual, polynesian ‘ brought to west and dressed up as a ‘greek philosopher’ to paint ‘savage’ as noble
- challenged previous conceptions of primitive as dirty and immoral and stupid
= resulted in a famous painting by sir Joshua Reynolds
rousseau
j.j. rousseau ‘the noble savage’; believed human society in state of ‘primtiive perfection ‘ at beginiing of time
primitive technology= more happy and content people= more at one with nature and social world; social and cultural belief sin harmony internally and exetnerally without ‘evils of modern simulation’
e.g. indigenous and neative beliefts; are logical, scientific and FUNCITONAL in the environment
in modern societies; social evolution is regressive and fractured unition
previous belief of hunter gatherers
seen as bottom of social human evolution as ‘at mery of nature’ and ‘dismayal existnece’
; lack society and are ex-svaages
- hunting as an ineffective economy
-domestification of nature= sign of evolved society
levi strauss re-analysis of hunter gatherer
hg are not primitive; are complex and its a choice to occupy a different ecosystem as:
1. they produce ans socialize in complex social organizaitons and beliefs
- accuulated knolwedge of terrirtory
- rarely starve; hence economically self sustaining
- they REJECT and KNOW of agriculture/alternative lifestyles, but choose not to follow as agriculturists stuck in society
- instead, maximize leisure over wealther to enjoy freedom of movement
marshall sahlins on HG
‘original affluent society’ 1968;
an affluent society is where all matieral needs are satisfied;
zen philosophy where its a self-sustaining economy
- happiness= out of low standards
thats why; HG societies have low standards; easily satisified; not poor in possession as poverty is a social status relative to a civilizaiton
Kwakiutl in Australia (levistrauss take) HG society
different marriage and age section patrimony and matrinony slave and slave system know where water, fishing hunting is inveted smoked salmon have knowledge of orientation and geography
bushmen in kalahari
- aretefacts; free from matieral pressure as purely tools addapted to living
- accumulation of objects; not a sign of status
- borrowing and no hoarding
- sloppy with posessesion (according to westerners)
- division of labour for food and water; energy conserved for maxiimum amount of people
- work less than we do; only work they have to feed for survival
- lack of schedule
- food quest as leisure
McCarthy-McArthur Study
- study on the nutritional outcomes of australian bushmen
1. erratic work patterns (2.5 hrs per adult per week); low economic standards and highly concentrate dphysical work
2. adequate dietry intake
3. food collecting is primary productive activity
4. less mobility means less wealth
5. no food storage= no hoarding= efficien thunting
6. rely on ECOLOGICAL Pressures