personhood readings Flashcards

1
Q

anne becker wrote?

A

nurtering, food exchange in fiji 1995

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

fijians?

A

cultivate body and space
little cultural to define ‘ideal body shape’ (despite asethetic appreciation)

pay more attention to individual variance

personal achievemnt by care performance and competence in providing food and services to other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does the body represent to the fijians

A

responsbility of microcumeinity to care and feed

body as indicator of social strength

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is magisis

A

festive events where food is exchanged to affirm satification with neighbours in fiji

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is kanavelevv

A

rhetoric of care in fiji; colelctive performative

primary cultural peocupation is hunger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

meaning of food in fiji

A

determien relationships as sign of colelctive resource and lavour;
consumed in vvast quantities adn assosications

kavu= totem root that roge solidairty in social gatherings as connecting to ancestrs adn welcoming visitors

food consumption as a totemic linkage to project colelctivty identitiy, locaility an dkinship

supiscion to ‘outsider food’ as it could be poisonoused or diseased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

papa new guinea and food

A

food hoarding judged and sharing encouraged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

hunger in fiji

A

is a moral commentary on persons ability to feed slf and assosiate with community

however being too fat shows glutony; which implies food hoarding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what did Anand Dandian write and what his his argument

A

2010: interior horizons; ethical space of self hood in south india
argument: interior selfhood in sotuh india understood by morally confuement of colonial western domination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

western selfhood

A

found in interiorities
self is an individual and individsible

neitzhe; soul is inward and relationhips as individual are interirotes to their exteriorities

morality achieved by self reflection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is selfhood in india like

A

aesthetic cleansing of soul is inward to purify sense of other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ayvath thevar

A

from combum valley in Tami Nadu State in South India;

interior dialouge of pain and reflection (split in sense of self); he is blind and originally from a wealthy family but became w diwoder, landelss and was rejected by children

he has failed judgement as he wants to nurture relationships but has non

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

colelctive history of interiorizaiton in india

A

‘ethical selfhood’ is inheireted; castes define moral selfhood

stereotypes assosicated with cases (like the Kallar community being lawless and impulsive by nature)

therefore selfhood is a radition of morality and ethics; attachement is bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

anand dandians conclusions about selfhood in india

A

inward folding of exterior life: (colonialism is disrupting it)

  1. colelctive history of morality in a case
  2. inheritred tradition of moral ocnduct
  3. engagement with matieral and social life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did jane carsten write

A

‘after kinship’ 2004; looks at how kin ties are intristinc to social contribution of a person in the west
; tries to overturn dichotomy between ‘western individualism’ and ‘nonwestern joined up’ person (i.e. individualism vs relationalitiy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

marily straterns concept of a person

A

personhood is found in relationship values and functiosn of society

17
Q

mauss concept of a person

A

prsonhood found ni historical and cultural contexts as a social history, defined through legal and moral terms

18
Q

pueblo indians

A

clan made up of multiple persons encalsupated by social roal (individual not seperation from function)

19
Q

non western concept of person

A

‘joined up oerson’ connectenedd and onon individiality; wider kin group form a colelctive idenetiy

20
Q

meyer fortes and tallensi in west africa

A

personhood as externally oriented

at birth; process of becoming a person begins; only when child is full adult consisered POTENTIAL person

at death; pull personhood achieved and checked by diviniion

personhood: marriage, children and social relationships throughout lifetime to ultimately continue patrilineal lineage

21
Q

yin in tallensi?

A

‘good destiny’ that differs each individual and is sean as the concinutiation of the acnestral persons; women assosiated with patrillenal yin and cant obtain full personhood therefore

22
Q

maurce bloch and the west

A

too much focus on individuality of person in west; leads to abortion euthanasia and other ethical debates as no coherent view of ‘being’

23
Q

diane blood case 1946

A

legal judgement focused on individual right of STEPHEN to donate blood

in contrast:

diane focused on RELATIONAL KINSHIP and public symapthy

24
Q

abrahamas 1990 and kideny/organ translat

A

boundaries of a person ‘donor’ and recipient; medically established

but culturally: relatives of deceased donor want to establish relationships with reciptient of decased odnor to see donor live on

medical law aims to maintain condifentiatliy and idscource this contunity

25
Q

adoption and personhood

A

in Scotland 1988: a grown adopted woman aims to findher father by dna screening in an attempt of ‘finding herself’

26
Q

carstens conclusions about personhood

A

in euroamerican context; identiy related to biological ancestry; this knoweldge of kinship relationality creates ideneitites as ‘constitituve information’

therefore kinship is intristic to ideneity and perosnhood in west; without knoweldge of paretndhood adn individuals sense of self is fractures or partial

27
Q

rebecca empeson wrote… and argument?

A

mongolia; personhood in objects

argument; mongolian ‘xinshing’ shows what kinship looks like in mongolia; shows containment of parts are seperated from whole to maintain kin relationships

kinship is the seperation of people and attention of things

DOING makes them visible or invisible; RELATIONANAL perpsectives show snow mongolian relationshisp create by separation and containment

28
Q

what is xinshing

A

mongolian concept of fortune; motivate ‘avar’; sperates a piece of a person and contatins it a difference form

29
Q

object sin mongolia

A

demand respect as people in mongolia; dont represent people but convienve the essense of a person tied to their belonging

  • not visual subsittiues for people but show how relationshi come into existence by the recation of ‘things’ or ‘piece to allow for a ‘liveable relationship’ in nomad culture
30
Q

yum

A

‘thing’ dont hav eot b ematieral objects

can be visible or invisible

things on top of the chest; abosrb people relations and continuation of certain relations insid ea shared space

31
Q

significance of speration and assemblage in mongolia

A

maintains connections with a person and place throuh ‘shared bone’ idea in agnatic kinships

objects act as anchors that tie the moving people around

32
Q

signfiicance of photo montage (mongolia)

A

demonstrates network of relations; individuals as ocmposed in a group

33
Q

nomadic herding in mongolia

A
  • maintaing relations in absense of people throug things; relation tio things created as persons physical and spiritual location in a shared space in a chest in a hosue