theories of emotions Flashcards

1
Q

affect

A

generic term for range of preferences, evals, moods, and emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

preferences

A

relatively mild subjective reactions, pleasant or unpleasant, directed towards objecte

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

moods

A

pos or neg affects w/o spec. target, but w some duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

emotions

A

complex assort of affects, can be intense w physical manifestations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

xy axis of emotions

A

unpleasant–pleasant (valence), arousal–deactivation (activation, deact.).
high arousal- high neg or pos affect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

plutchik emotions

A

8 basic emotions- anger, anticipation, joy, trust, fear, surprise, sadness, disgust. In a circle, combos of them create other emotions. Stronger or weaker (eg.; ecstasy-joy-serenity)
emotions very hard to understand- lots of diff research w diff results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

prototype view of emotions

A

feelings fit more of less to the prototype of a certain emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

social constructionist view

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

theories of how emotions come out/come from

A

james-lange theory
something happens, body responds, emotion occurs.
cannon bard theory
something happens (arousal), body reacts and emotion occurs concurrently
they arg that emotions can happen immed. while physical aspects follow more slowly, and ppl can have physical feelings w/o emotion (heart racing from running, but no fear)
schnachter singer two factor theory
arousal, body reacts and bc event is consciously percieved, cognitive label occurs (“im scared”), emotion
lazarus cog mediational theory
arousal, appraisal (cog- how should i feel depending on context?), emotion
facial feedback theory- no cognition, brain responds to face. Could not be replicated though.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

facial feedback theory

A

no cognition, brain responds to face. Could not be replicated though, small effects, unclear conditions under which effect occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

excitation transfer- arousal and attribution

A

love on a bridge (dutton and aron)
two diff bridges, one scary another not scary. participants approached on bridge by attractive woman. in scary bridge sitch, parts wrote sig more sexual stories, and 50% called her
in safe bridge, sig less sexual stories, and 13% called experimenter
BUT NOT RANDOMIZED so prob due to thrill seekers vs non

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

interruption theory and emotion

A

arousal plus mind theory (mandler)
interruptions lead to arousal,
if the cons. of the int. furthers your goals it leads to pos emotions, if it hinders goals, leads to neg emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

attributional theory

A

weiner
internal vs external locus (caused externally or interally?)
controllable?
durable?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

simulation heuristic

A

more easy to imagine other outcomes (a fluke incident) leads to stronger emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

norm theory

A

abnormal incidents leads to stronger emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

emotions as managers of goals

A

emot. as alarm signals- alert ppl to imp. goals

they lead to self-focused attention (is everything going well on the path i want to go on?)

17
Q

appraisal theory

A

primary (primitave) and secondary (problem or emotion focused coping)
fear related cognitions: w fear, there’s two cognitions that are central to your fear: 1) what are the chances of risk? 2) what is the expected negative impact?
-these together inform level of fear
-don’t always have full control of our emotions though, we may think about it too much or

18
Q

affective forecasting

A

ppl tend to overestiamte the impact of neg events
durability bias: ppl tend to overestimate impact of past events
ppl fail to take acct of their psych. immune system (don’t think they’re as resilient as they actually are)

19
Q

affect influences cognition

A

mood and helping; good mood–> more helping (unless it’ll ruin your mood)
mood leads to diff focus of attention; focus on self leads to helping while focus on other doesnt
separate process view
focus on rewards leads to helping, guilt/obligation emphasis doesnt
mood maintenence- if helping supports mood youll help, if not you wont
negative state relief hyp
unhappy ppl help when it relieves their mood

20
Q

mood congruent memory

A

if were in a bad mood, we think abt bad mems, if good, good mems
explanations
network model: spreadin activation (pos things activated, other pos things activated)
mood as information (judgment- how do i feel about it? if i feel good, everything must be positive)
affection infusion model (AIM)
pos mood- heuristic judgments; we go with simplified things which are generally more pos
neg mood- more controlled, so we dig into things thought wise and get more negative memory)

21
Q

mood and judgment

A

happy ppl like target objects more

22
Q

mood and decision making style

A

happy- flexible, quick

sad, more careful ,thoughtful, details

23
Q

mood and persuasion

A

pos mood increases compliance

24
Q

mood and wellbeing

A

being happy improves health, friendships, marriage, income, and performance

25
Q

separate systems view

A

zajonc
affective reactions are: primary, inescapable, irrevocable, diff to verbalize, dont need cognitions
objections: cog doesnt need to be conscious, can be rap and automatic