theories of emotions Flashcards
affect
generic term for range of preferences, evals, moods, and emotions
preferences
relatively mild subjective reactions, pleasant or unpleasant, directed towards objecte
moods
pos or neg affects w/o spec. target, but w some duration
emotions
complex assort of affects, can be intense w physical manifestations
xy axis of emotions
unpleasant–pleasant (valence), arousal–deactivation (activation, deact.).
high arousal- high neg or pos affect
plutchik emotions
8 basic emotions- anger, anticipation, joy, trust, fear, surprise, sadness, disgust. In a circle, combos of them create other emotions. Stronger or weaker (eg.; ecstasy-joy-serenity)
emotions very hard to understand- lots of diff research w diff results
prototype view of emotions
feelings fit more of less to the prototype of a certain emotion
social constructionist view
–
theories of how emotions come out/come from
james-lange theory
something happens, body responds, emotion occurs.
cannon bard theory
something happens (arousal), body reacts and emotion occurs concurrently
they arg that emotions can happen immed. while physical aspects follow more slowly, and ppl can have physical feelings w/o emotion (heart racing from running, but no fear)
schnachter singer two factor theory
arousal, body reacts and bc event is consciously percieved, cognitive label occurs (“im scared”), emotion
lazarus cog mediational theory
arousal, appraisal (cog- how should i feel depending on context?), emotion
facial feedback theory- no cognition, brain responds to face. Could not be replicated though.
facial feedback theory
no cognition, brain responds to face. Could not be replicated though, small effects, unclear conditions under which effect occurs
excitation transfer- arousal and attribution
love on a bridge (dutton and aron)
two diff bridges, one scary another not scary. participants approached on bridge by attractive woman. in scary bridge sitch, parts wrote sig more sexual stories, and 50% called her
in safe bridge, sig less sexual stories, and 13% called experimenter
BUT NOT RANDOMIZED so prob due to thrill seekers vs non
interruption theory and emotion
arousal plus mind theory (mandler)
interruptions lead to arousal,
if the cons. of the int. furthers your goals it leads to pos emotions, if it hinders goals, leads to neg emotions
attributional theory
weiner
internal vs external locus (caused externally or interally?)
controllable?
durable?
simulation heuristic
more easy to imagine other outcomes (a fluke incident) leads to stronger emotions
norm theory
abnormal incidents leads to stronger emotions