Test 2 Lecture Material Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are causes of attitudes?

A

information, operant and classical conditioning, modeling, and out own behavior (less obvious cause of attitudes).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the three big factors of socialization?

A

parent, peers, and media.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When does our own behavior effect our attitudes?

A

foot-in-the-door effect: agreeing to a smaller request initially makes you more likely to agree to a larger request later.
Role playing causes us to adopt attitudes consistent with the role we are playing (Stanford Prison Study).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a great example of how role play affects attitude?

A

The Stanford Prison Study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

BUTS… of Stanford Prison Study

A

volunteers for the study scored higher on aggression, authoritarian, and narcissism, and scored lower on empathy and altruism. So the volunteers we already aggressive to begin with.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What type of interaction was there in the Stanford Prison Experiment?

A

a person-situation interaction RATHER than a strict situationist account.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can hurting someone cause us to dislike that individual?

A

Yes.
Procedure: participant insulted by confederates.
IV: participants given an opportunity to shock the insulter or not.
DV: degree of like of the “insulter.”
Results: liked the “insulter” less in the shock condition.
Interpretations: dissonance overe hurting someone can be reduced by finding reasons to dislike him/her/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are 3 mentally healthy dissonance reducing behaviors?

A

Victim blaming, reduce stress, and feel more in control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Real life examples of cognitive dissonance theory with attitudes vs. behaviors.

A
Pro environment - throw cans in garbage. 
pro religion - cheat on your spouse
racism (asia) - buy asian products
law abiding - break speed limit
pro clean - pigsty at home
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

main strategies (8) for dissonance reduction

A

externally justify behavior and change one of the dissonant elements (unconscious attitude, behavior, and perception of attitude).
trivialize behavior, self affirmation (saying or thinking nice things about yourself), socially compare, and wait out the feelings of dissonance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Research example of dissonance.

A

Festinger and Carlsmith: shock experiment
participants paid to lie about boring task
IV: paid $1 or $20
DV: rating how interesting the task was
those paid $1 like the task (attitude change)
those paid $20 were better able to externally justify

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the number 1 way to reduce dissonance?

A

External justification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Applications for dissonance

A

increase recycling, increase water conservation, increase condom use, and decrease prejudice. ALL THROUGH HYPOCRISY INDUCTION.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hypocrisy Induction

A

1) reminding people of past failures to live up to the ideals being discussed.
2) when people fail to practice what they preach, their act of hypocrisy can induce cognitive dissonance and the motivation to change their behavior.
3) as opposed to other forms of dissonance reduction as attitude change.
4) people should publicly advocate the importance of the target course of action and are then privately reminded of their own recent personal failures to perform the target task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How are gender differenced socially influenced?

A

gender roles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why are women WAY more nurturing on average?

A

nature and nurture. It is both learned and the environment makes it so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The possible WHY’s for gender differences

A

evolutionary premise: we behave and think in ways that have helped our genes’ survival (fight-or-flight response because freezing is not adaptable).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Dating and Mating

A

attractiveness/youth: cues to reproductive health (unconsciously men say they need to have babies, instinct and genetic drive).
money and age: cues to offspring survival.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

EMPIRICAL support for evolutionary side

A

1) cross-cultural research: around the world research says that man care more about attractiveness
2) bar studies

20
Q

EMPIRICAL criticism of evolutionary side

A

empirical: there are not gender differences in preferences for attractiveness in short-term relationships and preference for money/support in particular cultures doesn’t hold up.

21
Q

What is crucial to remember about the evolutionary view?

A

it is essentially a cause-effect view, that genes (gender based) cause the observed gender differences (hindsight bias).

22
Q

Milgram’s Obedience Study

A

main implications: you don’t know how a study will turn out until you run it. prediction was <1% would go through with it; >65% did go through. he concluded that the nazis weren’t inherently evil. RECALL explaining doesn’t equal excusing!

23
Q

What does every behavior have?

A

personal and situational causes.

24
Q

ethical issues of milgram’s study

A

participants were under extreme stress (less obvious cause), participants’ self-concepts may have been dramatically altered.

25
Q

Conformity and Politics

A

visiting sights that support your viewpoint (Selective exposure, confirmation bias). sharing news that only supports your group (fake news is more likely to get shared).
Even if your own personal views are contradicted.

26
Q

Who conforms more?

A

teens in drug use. more antisocial than prosocial.

27
Q

Reactance

A

motive to protect your sense of freedom. Bugs vs. Daffy.

28
Q

Straightforwards findings about persuasion

A

persuaders are more successful when they are physically attractive and an expert in their field.

29
Q

4 causes of attitudes

A

conditioning, information availability, own behavior, modeling.

30
Q

Resisting persuasion

A

attitude inoculation: a strategy to help kids resist peer pressure “just-say-no” is not enough.

31
Q

3 steps to attitude inoculation

A

1) raise your child has smart/positive attitude from you
2) mild attacks on your child’s attitude at home
3) your child becomes better at defending against real attacks from peers

32
Q

knowledge of persuasion techniques can help…

A

foot-in-the-door technique, door-in-the-face (start with large request, get denied, retreat to smaller request).

33
Q

lowballing

A

start with good deal, get acceptance, change part of the deal.

34
Q

6 types of group influence

A

1) social scaffolding
2) social loafing
3) deindividuation
4) group polarization
5) groupthink
6) minority influence

35
Q

deindividuation definitions

A

becoming dumb animal in a large group, loss of self-awareness and evaluation apprehension, if one’s self standard is not to loot/vandalize, but one is swept away in a crowd.

36
Q

deindividuation background

A

mob behaviors: rioting after athletic events, lynching of blacks in the US

37
Q

deindividuation common elements

A

really large groups >50 people, aggressive, destructive, cruel behavior, otherwise good citizens who sometimes sincerely wonder later what got into them.

38
Q

deindividuation can be good and bad

A

true

39
Q

group polarization

A

a group-produced enhancement of preexisting tendencies

40
Q

example of group polarization with attitudes

A

you think a politician is corrupt. you have discussion with 5-6 likeminded others. you exit discussion with same, stronger feelings (echo chambers).

41
Q

Social Facilitation

A

triplett (1898): kids reeled fishing line in faster when other kids were around. performance improvement in the presence of others. sometimes presence of others impairs performance (improvement for simple tasks and impairment for difficult tasks).

42
Q

hypocrisy induction can…

A

decreases the risk of eating disorders.

43
Q

is evolution of physical attributes accepted by scientists?

A

YESSS

44
Q

LOGICAL criticism of evolutionary premise.

A

logical: human evolutionary research doesn’t equal experimental because gender isn’t a proper IV!

45
Q

LOGICAL support for evolutionary premise.

A

there is research support for the evolution of physical attributes in humans and behaviors in creatures (this is experimental research). It would be logical to generalize those behaviors to humans.