Task 9 Flashcards
What is meant by the basic argument ?
- we cannot truly/ultimately be morally responsible for our actions
- That means -> no punishment or reward is ever ultimately just
What is the main logic behind the basic argument ?
- Nothing can be causa sui
- In in order to be truly morally responsible for one’s actions, one would have to be causa sui
- Therefore nothing can be truly morally responsible
What does causa sui mean ?
- Nothing can be cause of itself
What was the main claim of the article ?
-people can change in certain respects, but they cannot supposed to change themselves in such a way as to become truly morally responsible for the way that they are regarding there action
On which four arguments does the main claim build up on ?
- One is the way one is as a result of heredity and experience
- You can not change at any later stage to become truly moral responsible
- If you try to change at an early stage the succes depend on heredity and experiences
- If changes are not due to heredity and experiences they are due to random factors of which you can not be responsible for either
What would happen if we would have true moral repsonsibility ?
- if we have TMR then it makes sense to reward/punish someone based on there action
Why do we believe that truly moral responsability exist ?
- Morally responsibilities situations of choice occur regularly in human life
- This gives u the feeling to be a self conscious agent that can think about what to do
How can we also define the basi argument ? (second defintion)
- Premise one: You do what you do, in any situation in which you find yourself, because of the way you are.
- Premise two: To be truly morally responsible for what you do you must be truly responsible for the way you are
In order to reject the basic argument what would u have to do ?
- you need to reject premise two since premise one is allways true
Why would u have a chance to reject premise 2 in the basic argument ?
- It can be rejected since “truly responsible” and ‘truly morally responsible’ can be defined in many ways
What is meant by determinism ?
- all events (incl. human action) are ultimately determined by causes regarded as external to the will
- You own will is not in charge of your action
What is the main motor regdarding the free will discussion ?
- Moral responsability
What are the three views which tried to reject the moral basic arguments ?
- Compatibilists
- Libertarian
- Third
Explain the compatibists view on the basic argument:
- One can truly be morally responsible even if determinism is true
- One is truly responsible as long as the actions are not caused by a certain set of constraints
- Belief that one doesn’t need to be truly responsible for how one is
Explain the Libertarian view on the basic argument:
- believe that freedom and moral responsibility are incompatible with determinism
- Dterminism is wrong since we are free and moraly responsible
Explai the “third” view on the basic argument:
- Accept that we can not be ultimately be held responsible of ones character personality and motivtaional structure (CPM) no matter if determinism is true or false
- But: One can still truly be responsible for one’s decisions and actions
- Self is independent of CPM
What is the problem with the compatibilists view ?
- fails to account to any sort of true moral responsibility
What is the problem with the libertarian view ?
- Moral responsibility depends on the falsity of determinism but determinism isn’t falsifiable
What is the problem with the third view on the basic argument ?
- Whatever the self decides it does that bc the way it is ! (CPM) and S are not independent
How are voluntary acts iniated /prepared ?
- via the unconscious cerebral proccesses before conscious intention appears