Supply/Administer/Offer Class C Controlled drug to persons under 18 years of age Flashcards
Supply/Administer/Offer Class C Controlled drug to persons under 18 years of age
Section 6 (1) (d) Misuse of Drugs Act 1975
Penalty
8 year
Elements
- Supplies/Administers OR offers to supply/administer/otherwise deals in
- Class C controlled drug
- To any person under the age of 18 years old
Supply
Includes to distribute, give or sell.
Sec 2, Misuse of Drugs Act 1975
R v Maginnis
Supply involves “more than the mere transfer of physical control … [it includes] enabling the recipient to apply the thing … to purposes for which he desires…”
Offers
Express readiness to do something for or on behalf of someone.
Offers to Supply - R v During
“[an offer is] an intimation by the person charged to another that he is ready on request to supply to that other, drugs of a kind prohibited by the statute”
Offering to supply - R v Brown
- Offers to supply a drug that he has on hand
- Offers to supply a drug that will be procured at some future date
- Offers to supply a drug that he mistakenly believes he can supply
- Offers to supply a drug deceitfully, knowing he will not supply that drug
Supply
Includes to distribute, give or sell.
Sec 2, Misuse of Drugs Act 1975
Offers
Express readiness to do something for or on behalf of someone.
Administer
Appropriate meaning is “to direct and cause a … drug to be taken into the system” of another person
Black Law’s Dictionary
Otherwise Deal
dealing in a drug by some means other than by distributing, giving or selling it, administering it or offering to supply or administer it
Must prove guilty knowledge
- knew about the supply/administering/offer
- knew the supply/administering/offer substance was a controlled drug
- intended to cause the supply/administering/offer
Police v Emerali
“the serious offence of … possessing a narcotic does not extend to some minute and useless residue of the substance”
R v Strawbridge
It is not necessary for the Crown to establish knowledge on the part of the accused. In the absence of evidence to the contrary knowledge on her part will be presumed, but if there is some evidence that the accused honestly believed on reasonable grounds that her act was innocent, then she is entitled to be acquitted unless the jury is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that this was not so.