Parties Flashcards

1
Q

Party

A

any person involved at any or all stages of preparing for, attempting, or actually committing an offence. Includes a person who incites or counsels another to commit the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Legislation

A

Section 66 Crimes Act 1961 (the planned offence)

Section 70 Crimes Act 1961 (ends up another offence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Pene

A

A party must intentionally help or encourage - it is insufficient if they were reckless as to whether the principal was assisted or encouraged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Renata

A

The court held that where the principal offender cannot be identified, it is sufficient to prove that each individual accused must have been either the principal or a part in one of the ways contemplated by s66(1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Larkins v Police

A

While it is unnecessary that the principal should be aware that he or she is being assisted, there must be proof of actual assistance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ashton v Police

A

An example of a secondary party owing a legal duty to a third person or to the general public is a person teaching another person to drive. That person is, in NZ, under a legal duty to take reasonable precautions, because under section 156 of the Crimes Act 1961 he is deemed to be in charge of a dangerous thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Russell

A

The court held that the accused was morally bound to take active steps to save his children, but by his deliberate abstention from so doing, and by giving the encouragement and authority of his presence and approval to his wife’s act he became an aider and abettor and thus a secondary offender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Betts & Ridley

A

An offence where no violence is contemplated and the principal offender in carrying out the common aim uses violence, a secondary offender taking no physical part in it would not be held liable for the violence used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly