stages of attachment Flashcards
what was the study conducted by Schaffer and Emerson about?
using naturalistic observations 60 infants were observed every month for a year measuring attachment levels by:
- levels of separation protest: 4 POINT scale on everday situations
- stranger anxiety: response to interviewer
what were the results of Schaffer and Emerson’s study?
+39% of infants formed a primary attachment to someone who didn’t feed or bathe the infant
+87% at 18 months >1
+50% at 10 months had >1
+29% at 7 months=3 attachments and 10% had 5
what can we conclude from Schaffer’s and Emerson’s study?
that we form more attachments as we get older
what was the first stage of attachment developed from Schaffer and Emerson’s study?
Asocial stage between 0-5 weeks
infant produces similar response to objects and people
as can’t tell difference
but no preference for specifics
smiling
what was the second stage of attachment developed from Schaffer and Emerson’s study?
Indiscriminate attachment stage 6weeks-7months
CAN tell people apart and more social
CAN distinguish who are strangers
NO stranger anxiety
what was the third stage of attachment developed from Schaffer and Emerson’s study?
Specific attachment stage 7-11 months
show separation and stranger anxiety
form primary attachments to 1 specific person
from 9 MONTHS can form subsequent attachments
what was the fourth stage of attachment developed from Schaffer and Emerson’s study?
Multiple attachments 11+ months
several attachments to important people— family
separation anxiety to secondary attachments
2 strengths of Schaffer and Emerson stages of attachment
+research (include % and what the results imply)
+Practical applications as can be used socially (in nurseries) to distinguish if a child is suffering from abnormal development to lead to supporting child
2 weaknesses of schaffer and emerson stages of attachment
-there are methodological problems:
.observed in infants home (unnatural behaviour/lacks validity)
.limited sample as only from Scotland
.4 point scale could be bias
-the study is culturally specific (individualistic culture)