Staffing Decisions/ Evaluating Selection Techniques and Decisions Flashcards

1
Q

Hiring Process

A

Planning -) Acquiring Applicants -) Selecting Applicants -) Hiring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Employee Selection Systems

A

Optimal selection systems are:
o Reliable
o Valid
o Cost Effective
o Fair
o Reduce the Chance of a Legal Challenge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is Sequential View of the Staffing Process

A

involves several steps that aid organizations in hiring, training, and retaining employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reliability

A

The extent to which a score from a test is consistent and free from
errors of measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Methods of determining reliability

A

Test-retest (temporal stability)

  • Alternate forms (form stability)
  • Internal reliability (item stability)
  • Scorer reliability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Validity

A

The degree to which inferences from scores on tests or assessments are justified by the evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Common ways to measure

A

Content validity
* Criterion validity

  • Construct validity
  • Known-group validity
  • Face validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Planning

A

Planning: Anticipating needs for human resources

  • Expansion vs. replacements
  • Labor markets
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Recruitment

A
  • The initial point of contact is usually the organization’s website, which has advantages and disadvantages
  • In competitive jobs, many companies fight for same employees so more expensive recruitment methods may be necessary
  • Inside sources (i.e., referrals & transfers) perform better
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Selecting Employees

A

organizations hope to recruit numerous good applicants

  • More selective an organization can be, greater chance of hiring successfulScientific selection
  • Criterion – definition of good employee performance
  • Predictor – anything that relates to the criterion

determine if predictor relates to criterion by using a validation study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the steps to conducting a validation Study

A
  1. Conduct a job analysis
  2. Specify job performance criteria
  3. Choose predictors
    * e.g., psychological tests or interviews
  4. Validate the predictors
    * concurrent vs predictive
  5. Cross-validate
    * validity generalization
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Measurement Bias

A

o Technical aspects of the test

o A test is biased if there are group differences in test scores (e.g.,
race, gender) that are unrelated to the construct being measured
(e.g., integrity).

o Burden is on organization to prove test is valid if it causes adverse
impact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Predictive Bias

A

A test is fair if people of equal probability of success on a job have an equal chance of being hired

o Single-group validity

o Differential validity

  • Not use the test
  • Use the test with separate regression equations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Selection Ratio (SR)

A

Selection Ratio (SR)
* Index ranging from 0 to 1 that reflects the ratio of available jobs to applicants

SR = n/N

n = number of available jobs
N = number of applicants assessed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Utility Analysis

A
  • Utility analysis can address the cost/benefit ratio of one staffing
    strategy versus another

Assesses economic return on investment of HR interventions like
staffing or training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Utility

A

Value of selection system to the organization.

Valid predictors increase true positives and reduce false positives

o Must determine if benefits to
organization outweigh costs of the
selection devices

17
Q

Utility is maximized by

A
    1. Base rate for success—should be 50%
    1. Selection ratio (hired/applicants)—should be low
    1. Validity of selection device—should be high
18
Q

Selection Decisions( Hint False or True

A

False positive:
* Applicant accepted but performed poorly.

False negative:
* Applicant rejected but would have performed well.

True positive:
* Applicant accepted & performed well.

True negative:
* Applicant rejected & would have performed poorly.

19
Q

Unfairness

A

Feelings of unfairness regarding Staffing Strategies can lead to:

  • Initiation of lawsuits
  • Filing of formal grievances with company representatives
  • Counterproductive behavior
20
Q

Practical Issues in Staffing

A

Comprehensiveness
* Enough high quality information about candidates to predict likelihood of their success

  • Compensatory
  • Candidates can compensate for relative weakness in one attribute through strength in another one, providing both are required by job.
21
Q

Making a Hiring Decision( The Linear Approaches)

A

Unadjusted top-down selection
* Rule of three
* Passing scores
* Banding

22
Q

Combining Information( CDM and SDM)

A

Clinical Decision Making: Uses judgment to combine information & make decision about relative value
of different candidates

Statistical Decision Making: Combines information according to a mathematical formula.

23
Q

Combining Information (Hint Hurdle)

A

( Hurdle system of combining scores)
Non- compensatory strategy: Individual has no opportunity to compensate at later stage for low score in earlier stage.

Establishes series of cut scores

24
Q

Hurdle System of Combining Scores

A

Constructed from multiple hurdles so candidates who do not exceed each of the minimum dimension scores are excluded from further consideration.

  • Often set up sequentially
  • More expensive hurdles placed later
  • Used to narrow a large applicant pool
25
Q

Cut Score or Cutoff Score

A
  • Specified point in distribution of scores below which candidates are
    rejected.
  • Raising cut score will result in fewer false positives but more false
    negatives.
  • Strategy for determining cut score depends on situation.
26
Q

Establishing Cut Scores

A

Criterion-referenced cut score

  • Consider desired level of performance & find test score corresponding to that level
  • Norm-referenced cut score
  • Based on some index of test-takers’ scores rather than any notion of job performance
27
Q

Score Banding part 1

A

o Individuals with similar test scores can be grouped together in a
category or score band.

o Selection within band can be made based on other
considerations.

o Score Banding is controversial

28
Q

Score Banding

A

Score Banding uses the Standard error of measurement
(SEM) for the test:

  • SEM provides a measure of the amount of error in a test score
    distribution.
  • Function of reliability of test & variability of test scores.
29
Q

Score Banding systems ( there are 2)

A

Fixed band system
* Candidates in lower bands not considered until higher bands have
been exhausted.

o Sliding band system
* Permits band to be moved down a score point when highest score
in a band is exhausted

30
Q

Selection vs. Placement

A

Selection is of little value if employees do not accept and keep job offers
* Positive recruitment process
* Comparable salary benefits
Cafeteria benefits

Placement
Process of matching multiple applicants & multiple job openings

31
Q

Placement Strategies

A

Vocational guidance
* Pure selection
* Cut & fit

32
Q

Getting Applicants to Accept Offers (Realistic Job Preview (RJP)

A
  • Give applicants accurate information about job and organization
  • Reduce number of acceptances
  • Increase job performance and job satisfaction
33
Q

Deselection
2 typical situations

A
  • Termination for cause
  • Individual is fired for a particular reason
  • Generally, not unexpected
  • Layoff
  • Job loss due to employer downsizing or reductions in workforce
  • Often occurs with little or no warning
34
Q

The parts of Small Staffing Projects that good.

A

Luxury of using wider range of assessment tools.

Adverse impact is less of an issue.

Fairness is still a key issue.

Rational, job-related, & feasible selection strategies are important

35
Q

Large Staffing Projects

A

Concessions must be made: Labor intensive assessment procedures
are often not feasible.

o Cost of testing can be quite expensive.

o Fairness is a critical issue.

o Standard, well-established, & feasible selection strategies are
important.