Spine - RC Q's Flashcards
<div>RC 2018, 2016, 2014. What is the expected functional ability of a quadriplegic patient with C7 function?</div>
<div>a.Chin powered motorized wheelchair</div>
<div>b.Fully independent for transfers</div>
<div>c.Wheelchair manual for daily transport</div>
<div>d.Motorized wheelchair with some manual (short distances)</div>
C<div><ul> <li>Bruns AS (Spine 2001) Establishing prognosis and maximizing functional outcomes after spinal cord injury</li> <ul> <li>C7 patients gain functional strength in the triceps. The ability to forcefully extend the elbow allows the patient to lift their body weight.</li> <li>These patients can roll over, sit up in bed, and move about in the sitting position. Motivated patients can also transfer independently.</li> <li>Some assistance may still be required for toileting and dressing activities, particularly for the lower extremities. Eating can be done independently except for cutting.</li> <li>Independent wheelchair propulsion is possible for long distances on smooth surfaces.</li></ul></ul> <ul> <li>AAOS Comprehensive Review page 235</li> <ul> <li>C4 - wheelchair mobility with sip and puff controls, usually don’t need ventilator</li> <li>C5 - power wheelchair with hand controls. May even be able to use manual wheelchairs with grip enhancements with tremendous energy usage</li> <li>C6 - manual wheelchair with grip enhancements, most prefer power wheelchair, sometimes transfers with a slider</li> <li>C7 - most ADLs/IADLs independently or with very minimal assistance. Manual wheelchair can be used, troubles with uneven surfaces</li> <li>C8 - total independence</li> </ul></ul></div>
<div>RC 2011 - Given a sagittal CT cut showing a T5 flexion distraction injury. What is the neurological injury? </div>
<ol> <li>anterior</li> <li>complete</li> <li>mixed UMN & Lower</li> <li>central</li></ol>
“<div>ANSWER: B</div> <ul> <li>2011</li> <li>Couldn’t find any evidence (neither could old groups) - debate between A and B</li> <li>My Logic:</li> <ul> <li>Flexion distraction in the thoracic and lumbar spine don’t have axial load to them to columns fail in TENSION. Therefore more likely to have either posterior based lesion or complete cord</li> <li>Anterior cord is compression to anterior spine</li> <li>Central cord is an extension injury</li> <li>No reason to have LMN signs in thoracic spine</li> </ul></ul>”
<div>RC 2010 - MRI of severe cervical flexion injury with posterior displacement of the body. What is the most likely spinal cord injury?</div>
<ol> <li>UMN</li> <li>Anterior cord</li> <li>Central cord</li> <li>LMN</li></ol>
2.<div><ul> <li>Wheeless:</li> <ul> <li>Flexion tear drop fractures are associated with acute anterior cervical cord syndrome</li> </ul></ul></div>
<div>RC 2012 - All of the following associations are right except?</div>
<ol> <li>Foot Dorsiflexion - L4 </li> <li>Sensation over patella L2 </li> <li>Hamstring reflex L5-S1 </li> <li>Hip abductors – L5</li></ol>
“B. L3 gives sensation over patella<div><br></br></div><div><div> <div> <div><img></img></div> </div></div></div>”
RC 2016, 15, 14, 13, 12,… List the 11 myotomes in ASIA scale and corresponding muscle groups. (Variations - 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016)
“<div><img></img></div> <div>C7 also does wrist flexion (MCQ 2015)</div><div><br></br></div> <div><img></img></div><div><br></br></div><div><br></br></div>”
RC 2015 - Patient with complete spinal cord injury; C7 spinal level. What is most likely to still be working? <ol> <li>Wrist flexion, finger flexion, brachioradialis reflex, radial sensation</li> <li>Wrist flexion, finger extension, triceps reflex, absent medial forearm sensation </li> <li>Wrist extension, finger abduction, biceps reflex, medial forearm sensation </li> <li>Wrist extension, finger flexion, triceps reflex, radial sensation</li></ol>
B.<div><br></br></div><div>wrist flexion = C7</div><div>finger ext = C6/7</div><div>triceps reflex = C7</div><div>medial forearm = C8</div>
RC 2015 List 3 factors that would help you diagnose an incomplete spinal cord injury?
<ul> <li>JAAOS - Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: I. Evaluation and Classification</li> <ul> <li>Sensory function below the level of the injury</li> <li>Voluntary motor control below the level of the injury</li> <li>Sacral Sparing</li> </ul></ul>
<div>RC 2013 - List 3 examination features suggestive of sacral sparing</div>
<ul> <li>Sensory</li> <ul> <li>Presence of intact perianal sensation (light touch and pin prick)</li> <li>Presence of deep anal sensation (to deep pressure) on digital rectal exam</li> </ul> <li>Motor</li> <ul> <li>Presence of voluntary anal sphincter contraction</li> </ul></ul>
<div>RC 2012, 2010 - List 4 features of Brown-Sequard Syndrome</div>
“<div><ul> <li>Ipsilateral loss of MVP: motor, vibration, proprioception</li> <ul> <li>Unilateral UMN findings</li> </ul> <li>Contra-lateral pain/temperature loss (spinothalamic tract)</li></ul><div>best prognosis, 90% recovery</div><div><br></br></div></div><div><img></img><br></br></div>”
<div>RC 2014, 15 - A patient sustains a gunshot wound to the right side of the neck. He develops a Brown-Sequard syndrome. Which of the following is true regarding his neurologic deficits?<br></br></div>
<ol> <li>Loss of motor function to right upper and lower extremities, ipsilateral loss of pain and temperature </li> <li>Loss of motor function to right upper and lower extremities, contralateral loss of vibration and position sense</li> <li>Loss of motor function to right upper and lower extremities, contralateral loss of pain and temperature sensation</li> <li>Loss of motor function to right upper and lower extremities, contralateral loss of pain and vibration</li></ol>
C<div><br></br></div><div>BS = ipsilateral loss of mvp = motor, vib, pro; contralateral loss of pt</div>
<div>RC 2017, 2014, 2011 - List 3 features of central cord syndrome</div>
<ul> <li>JAAOS 2009 - Central Cord</li> <ul> <li>Upper extremities are more severely affected than lower</li> <li>Distal more than Proximal</li> <li>Sacral Sparing (its an incomplete injury!)</li> <ul> <li>Bowel and bladder only in severe cases</li> </ul> </ul></ul>
<div><div>RC 2015, 2008 - Given a sagittal MRI showing cervical stenosis and myelomalacia. Patient had fall and presents with neck pain. No neuro deficits described. What is the most likely physical exam finding</div> <ol> <li>UE > LE weakness, distal > proximal</li> <li>LE > UE weakness, distal > proximal</li> <li>UE > LE weakness, proximal > distal</li> <li>LE > UE weakness, proximal > distal</li></ol></div>
A. central cord syndrome<div><ul> <li>Upper extremities affected more than lower extremities</li> <li>Hands most affected</li> <ul> <li>Usually last to recover</li> </ul> <li>Urinary retention, bowel and sexual dysfunction in most severe cases</li></ul></div>
<div>RC 2014 - A patient presents to ER with C5/6 jumped facets and complete quadriplegia following an MVC (or some other similar trauma). It is an isolated injury. The patient is bradycardic (HR 60?) and hypotensive (80/45 mmHg). So far the patient has been given 6L of crystalloid. What should you do now?</div>
<ul> <li>A. Slow IV to maintenance rate</li> <li>B. Start transfusing blood</li> <li>C. Give albumin</li> <li>D. Rapid bolus with IV crystalloid</li></ul>
A. neurogenic shock - do not overload pt. should actually give pressors<div><br></br></div><div><div>Treatment of neurogenic shock includes an initial fluid challenge, Trendelenberg positioning, vasopressors after central line insertion and atropine for treatment of bradyarrhythmia</div></div>
<div>RC 2015, 14, 12, 11 - All of the following regarding spinal tracts true except:</div>
<ol> <li>Anterior corticospinal tracts carry less motor than lateral corticospinal tracts</li> <li>Lateral corticospinal tracts are called pyramidal tracts</li> <li>Lateral corticospinal tracts arranged so that cervical spine is more central than sacral spine</li> <li>Posterior sensation tracts arranged so that the cervical spine ascending tracts are more central than sacral spine</li></ol>
“<b>D.</b><div><img></img><b><br></br></b></div>”
<div>RC 2011 - What is associated with normal motor strength in the lower extremities, but loss of bowel and bladder function</div>
<ol> <li>Conus medullaris syndrome</li> <li>Brown sequard</li> <li>Anterior spinal syndrome </li> <li>Ascending spine syndrome</li></ol>
“A.<div><ul> <li>Conus medullaris syndrome,or injury of the sacral cord (conus) and lumbar nerve roots within the spinal canal, usually results in an areflexic bladder, bowel, and lower extremities. Most of these injuries occur between T11 and L2 and result in flaccid paralysis in the perineum and loss of all bladder and perianal muscle control. The irreversible nature of this injury to the sacral segments is evidenced by the absence of the bulbocavernosus reflex and the perianal wink. Motor function in the lower extremities between L1 and L4 may be present if nerve root sparing occurs.</li></ul> <ul> <li>Ascending spine syndromeis a pathological term referring to the softening of the spinal cord.<a>[1]</a> The disorder causes<a>flaccid paraplegia</a>(impairment of motor function in lower extremities), total<a>areflexia</a>(below normal or absence of reflexes) of the pelvic limbs and anus, loss of deep pain perception<a>caudal</a>(toward the coccyx, or tail) to the site of spinal cord injury, muscular<a>atrophy</a>(wasting away of muscle tissue), depressed mental state, and respiratory difficulty due to<a>intercostal</a>(muscles that run between the ribs) and diaphragmatic<a>paralysis</a></li></ul></div>”
RC 2015 - What is not associated with cervicomedullary syndrome: <ol> <li>Hypotension</li> <li>Facial numbness</li> <li>LE > UE symptoms</li> <li>Complete or incomplete paralysis is possible</li></ol><ul><ul> </ul></ul>
<div><br></br></div>
<div>ANSWER: C</div>
<ul> <ul> <li>The essential clinical features are respiratory insufficiency or arrest, hypotension, varying degrees of tetraparesis, sensory changes from C1-C4 and sensory loss over the face in the onion skin or Dejerine pattern</li> <li>Arm > Leg weakness</li> <li>More severe involvement the more rostral the injury</li> </ul></ul>
<div>RC 2014, 2012 - 5 radiographic or clinical features suggesting an unstable C spine injury</div>
“<ul> <li>General</li> <ul> <li>Flexion tear drop</li> <li>Translation on flex/ex films</li> <li>Bilateral facet fracture or dislocation</li> </ul> <li>C0-C1</li> <ul> <li>Harris Rule of 12s: BDI >12mm (N<12mm); BAI >12mm (N4-12mm)</li> <li>Power’s Ratio >1.0 or <0.7 (N=0.7-1)</li> <li>Vertical Displacement >2mm between occiput and C1</li> </ul> <li>C1-C2</li> <ul> <li>ADI > 3.5mm</li> <li>PADI < 14mm</li> <li>Combined C1 lateral mass displacement/overhang on open mouth odontoid view > 6.9mm</li> </ul> <li>Subaxial</li> <ul> <li>Anterolisthesis >3mm</li> <li>11o angulation</li> </ul></ul>”
<div>RC 2017 - C5/6 quad, maxilla and mandible fracture, closed reduced with 15lbs traction, starts developing vertigo, diploplia, nystagmus, tinnitus, difficulty swallowing, something to do with palate elevation being asymmetric. What is the cause:</div>
<ol> <li>Vestibulobasilar insufficiency syndrome</li> <li>Subdural hematoma</li> <li>Unrecognized ocular trauma</li> <li>Ascending c-spine syndrome</li></ol>
A.<div><br></br></div><div>Basilar Artery Stroke: <div>The clinical presentation of basilar artery occlusion (BAO) ranges from mild transient symptoms to devastating strokes with high fatality and morbidity. Often, non-specific prodromal symptoms such as vertigo or headaches are indicative of BAO, and are followed by the hallmarks of BAO, including decreased consciousness, quadriparesis, pupillary and oculomotor abnormalities, dysarthria, and dysphagia.</div></div>
<div>RC 2016, 2013 - How do you calculate the Power’s ratio where B=basion, A=anterior arch of atlas, O=opisthion, C=posterior arch of atlas </div>
<ol> <li>BA/CO </li> <li>BC/AO </li> <li>AC/BO </li> <li>AB/CO</li></ol>
“2.<div><br></br></div><div><img></img><br></br></div>”
<div>RC 2008 - CT of upper C spine showing possible C0-C1 dissociation. All of the following except:</div>
<ol> <li>shows altantooccipital dissociation</li> <li>Powers ratio > 1</li> <li>Increased distance between dens and Basion</li> <li>Basion dens interval decreased.</li></ol>
“D. BDI normal <12mm<div><div> <div> <div><img></img></div> </div></div></div><div><ul> <li>JAAOS 2014 - Upper Cervical Spine Trauma</li> <ul> <li>Increased BDI and BAI (Harris Rule of 12s)</li> </ul></ul></div>”
<div>RC 2017 - Which of the following is positive for occipital cervical instability</div>
<div>A. BAI <12</div>
<div>B . Basion Dens Interval > 12 </div>
<div>C . Odontoid above McCrae’s line</div>
<div>D. Increased ADI > 5mm</div>
“B.<div><ul> <li>Basion to posterior axial interval is > 12 mm in OC instability</li> <li>Odontoid above Mcrae’s line is a sign of basilar invagination</li> <li>Increased ADI > 5 mm is a sign of atlanto axial instability</li><li><div> <div> <div><img></img></div> </div></div></li></ul></div>”
<div>RC 2016 - There is a patient that sustained a fall and now has radicular arm pain and neck pain. Given an xray showing 25% vertebral body translation indicative of a C4/5 unilateral jumped facet. What would you find on physical exam? </div>
<ol> <li>Supraclavicular numbness </li> <li>Weakness of elbow flexion with lateral shoulder numbness </li> <li>Supraclavicular numbness + something else </li> <li>Hand weakness</li></ol>
B.<div><br></br><div>C4/C5 - C5 nerve injury!</div></div>
<div>RC 2016, 2011, 2010 - List 5 negative prognostic factors for Type 2 odontoid fractures.</div>
<div><ul> <li>JAAOS 2010 - Odontoid Fractures; FRCS Ortho Boards, Orthobullets</li> <ul> <li>Patient</li> <ul> <li>Age>50</li> <li>Delay in tx >4 days</li> </ul> </ul> <ul> <li>Fracture Pattern</li> <ul> <li>Posterior displacement > 5mm</li> <li>Comminution</li> <li>Angulation > 10o</li> <li>Fracture gap > 1mm</li> <li>Loss of position > 2mm (re-displacement)</li> </ul> </ul></ul></div>
<div>RC 2017 - An old person has an odontoid fracture, all of the following are viable treatment option except:</div>
<ol> <li>Posterior angulation >10o, C1-2 fusion</li> <li>Minimally displaced fracture, Cervical collar</li> <li>Displaced fracture, odontoid screw</li> <li>Displaced fracture, halo</li></ol>
D.<div><br></br><div><div>JAAOS 2010 Odontoid Fractures: Update on Management</div> <ul> <li>In elderly patients, halo-vest immobilization is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality; thus, its use should be avoided. In a retrospective analysis, Tashjian et al52 reported that patients aged >65 years with a type II or III odontoid fracture managed with a halo vest had a 42% mortality rate, compared with a 20% rate in the nonhalo group (P = 0.03)</li> <li>Both anterior fixation and posterior atlantoaxial fusions have also led to acceptable healing rates when used in elderly patients</li></ul></div><div><br></br></div></div>
<div>RC 2012 - List 3 ways to do posterior C1-2 fusion</div>
“<ul> <li>Trans-articular Screws (Magerl)</li> <li>Sub-laminar wires</li> <li>Lateral Mass Screw Fixation (Harms)</li> </ul> <ul> <li><img></img></li></ul>”
<div>RC 2011 - List two important considerations to take into account for placing C1-C2 trans-articular screws</div>
“<ul><li>Reduciblilty of C1-C2 articulation</li><li>Location of vertebral artery</li> <li>Location of C2 nerve root (JAAOS ICL on C1/2 fixation)</li> <li>Hypoplastic C2 pars (variable individual anatomy)</li><li><img></img><br></br></li></ul>”
<div>RC 2008 - Where to put screws in occiput for strongest construct</div>
<ol> <li>Midline because of thickest bone</li> <li>Inferior to nucchal line</li> <li>Laterally</li> <li>Medially and laterally</li></ol>
A. Caudad to EOP, midline
“<div>RC 2008 - What is advantage of dynamic plate (over a rigid plate?) for anterior spine</div> <ol> <li>Increased fusion rate</li> <li>Allows subsidence</li> <li>Load shares with subsidence</li> <li>Hasn’t been shown to make a difference</li></ol>”
“D. (old answer C, but group consensus on D)<div><ul> <li>Rigid anterior cervical plates lead to stress shielding of the bone graft</li> <li>Dynamic plates allow load sharing (therefore subsidence)</li> <li>"”it is unclear whether dynamic plates provide superior or even equivalent fusion rates to rigid plates””</li></ul></div>”
<div>RC 2008 - Which would not alter your approach for a C-spine myelopathic patient</div>
<ol> <li>Previous incision</li> <li>Sagittal alignment</li> <li>Location of compression</li> <li>Presence of radiculopathy</li></ol>
D.<div><ul> <li>Previous incision important with ACDF</li> <li>Cannot do posterior only approach if spine is kyphotic</li> <li>Ideally like to approach from the side of the compression</li></ul></div>
<div>RC 2014 - Regarding the anterior approach to the cervical spine, all of the following are true EXCEPT?</div>
<ol> <li>Omohyoid transection improves access to the lower C spine</li> <li>The parasympathetic trunk is at risk</li> <li>Sub-platysmal fascial dissection improves exposure</li> <li>The recurrent laryngeal nerve runs in the tracheoesophageal groove</li></ol>
B. sympathetic chain at risk<div><br></br></div><div><ul><li>Crossing Structures</li><ul><li>Must be preserved:</li><ul><li>Recurrent laryngeal nerve</li><li>Superior laryngeal nerve</li><li>Hypoglossal nerve</li></ul><li>Cross but can be sacrificed:</li><ul><li>Superior and inferior thyroid artery</li><li>Omohyoid</li><ul><li>Runs distal lateral to cephalad medial at roughly C6</li><li>Division allows more extensile exposure</li></ul></ul></ul></ul></div><div><ul> <li>Transverse incision from midline to border SCM centered over level of interest</li> <li>Vertical dissection through platysma after bluntly undermining skin</li> <li>Blunt dissection through deep cervical fascia</li> <li>Retract SCM laterally and strap muscles medially</li> <li>Palpate for carotid artery in carotid sheath and then open pretracheal fascia medial to that; develop plane and retract carotid sheath laterally and esophagus and trachea medially</li> <ul> <li>Recurrent laryngeal lives in the TE groove</li> <li>Thyroid arteries are in this layer and can be ligated if necessary</li> </ul> <li>Once retract structures fully medially identify interval between the longus coli muscles in the vertebral midline (prevertebral fascia)</li> <ul> <li>Dissect sharply onto the vertebra between the longus coli muscles and gently spread them</li> <ul> <li>Sympathetic chain is on lateral aspect of longus coli muscles</li> </ul> </ul> <li>Can use cautery to dissect through ALL onto vertebrae and clear off desired disc level (**confirm level with fluro)</li> <li>Incise disc, do what you have to do</li> </ul> <ul> <li><br></br></li><ul><ul><ul> </ul> </ul> </ul></ul></div>
<div>RC 2011 - Contents of the carotid sheath include the carotid artery, internal jugular vein, and what other structure? </div>
<ol> <li>Vagus nerve</li> <li>phrenic nerve</li> <li>Vagus and phrenic nerve</li> <li>Vagus and sympathetic</li></ol>
A.
<div>RC 2013 - Recurrent laryngeal nerve is branch of what</div>
<ol> <li>Vagus</li> <li>Superior branch of laryngeal</li> <li>Accessory spinal nerve</li></ol>
“A.<div><img></img><br></br></div><div><ul><li>left RLN<ul><li>ascends in neck in tracheoesophageal groove after branching off from parent nerve the vagus at the level of the arch of the aorta</li></ul></li><li>right RLN<ul><li>runs alongside the trachea in the neck after hooking around the right subclavian artery</li><li>crosses from lateral to medial to reach midline</li><li>more vulnerable than left during exposure because<ul><li>it has a more variable course</li><li>lies more anterolateral</li></ul></li></ul></li></ul></div>”
<div>RC 2015 - What are the most important predictors of instability in a thoracolumbar fracture (3 points)?</div>
<ul> <li><b><u>Morphology:</u></b></li> </ul>
<div> <div>Compression</div> <div>1</div> <div>Burst</div> <div>+1</div> <div>Rotation-translation</div> <div>3</div> <div>Distraction</div> <div>4</div> </div>
<ul> <li><b><u>Neurologic Status:</u></b></li> </ul>
<div> <div>Intact</div> <div>0</div> <div>Nerve Root</div> <div>2</div> <div>Spinal cord/conus medularis</div> <ul> <li>Incomplete</li> </ul> <div>3</div> <div> - Complete</div> <div>2</div> <div>Cauda Equina</div> <div>4</div> </div>
<ul> <li><b><u>Posterior Ligaments:</u></b></li> </ul>
<div> <div>Intact</div> <div>0</div> <div>Indeterminate</div> <div>1</div> <div>Disrupted</div> <div>2</div> </div>
<div>RC 2015, 2013 - All of the following are true about a lumbar burst fracture, except</div>
<ol> <li>It is usually the inferior endplate that is retropulsed</li> <li>Facet joints can be diastased</li> <li>Pedicles widened on AP</li> <li>Lamina often involved</li> </ol>
<div></div>
A. RARELY inferior endplate<div><br></br></div><div><ul> <li>Atlas SW (Am J Roentgenol 1986) The radiographic characterization of burst fractures of the spine</li> <ul> <li>Characteristic Features of a Burst:</li> <ul> <li>Posterior element fractures (fracture of necessity of the lamina)</li> <li>Vertical sagittal plane fracture through body</li> <li>Increased inter-pedicular distance</li> <li>Anterior wedging of the vertebral body with loss of height</li> <li>Retropulsion (SUPERIOR endplate retropulsed)</li> </ul> <li>Indicators of Potential Instability:</li> <ul> <li>Translation of one vertebra on another</li> <li>Loss of greater than 50% height</li> <li>Fracture through posterior elements</li> <li>Increased inter-pedicular distance</li> <li>Greater than 25 degrees kyphosis</li> <li>Multiple adjacent VB involved</li> </ul> </ul></ul></div>
<div>RC 2012 - Burst fracture; all of the following except?</div>
<ol> <li>Anterior vertebral body is disrupted</li> <li>Posterior vertebral body is disrupted</li> <li>Lamina are fractured</li> <li>There is a liner correlation with the amount of retropulsion and neurological injury</li></ol>
D.<div><br></br></div><div><div>Neurologic injury is dependent on size of canal and level of injury in association with degree of retropulsion</div></div>
<div>RC 2014, 2008 - One month following an L1 burst fracture with 60% canal stenosis, a patient presents with new onset numbness and weakness to both legs. What is the optimal treatment?</div>
<ol> <li>L1 laminectomy</li> <li>T12-L2 posterior fusion</li> <li>Thoracoabdominal approach with L1 corpectomy and anterior column reconstruction</li> <li>Observation</li></ol>
“C. new neuro findings - treat!<div><ul> <li>Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma II. Principles of Management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995;3:353-360.</li> <ul> <li>In cases of significant canal compromise and incomplete or complete neurologic injury, we prefer anterior decompression by means of vertebral corpectomy and autologous iliac-crest strut grafting, followed by posterior compression instrumentation with the use of hooks or transpedicular screws. </li> <li>Thoughts:</li> <ul> <li>Can’t do short posterior fusion at thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2)</li> <li>Bracing obviously a bad idea</li> <li>Laminectomy at L1 –> destabilize already kyphotic junction area and this is conus level so may not decompress</li> </ul> </ul></ul></div>”
<div>RC 2011 - Thoracolumbar burst fracture with significant canal compromises treated non-operatively. What happens to canal afterwards.</div>
<ol> <li>Canal stays the same</li> <li>Canal increases in size</li> <li>Canal decreases in size</li> <li>Lateral recess stenosis</li></ol>
B.<div><ul> <li>JBJS 2003:</li> <ul> <li>RCT 47 patients with non-op bursts</li> <li>Changed from 34% canal compromise to 19% at 44 months</li> </ul> <li>CORR 1996:</li> <ul> <li>6 patients</li> <li>55% to 20% at final follow up</li> </ul></ul></div>
<div>RC 2015 - What are 3 risks of vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty?</div>
<ul> <li>JAAOS 2014 - Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture</li> <ul> <li>Cement Leakage</li> <li>Embolization of the Cement</li> <li>New Fracture (adjacent vertebrae)</li> </ul> <li>NEJM 2009 - A RCT of Vertebroplasty for Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures</li> <ul> <li>Cement extra-vasation</li> <li>Fracture</li> <li>Osteomyelitis</li> <li>Tightness in back/rib cage</li> <li>Puncture site pain</li> <li>Chest pain</li> </ul></ul>
<div><br></br></div>
<div>-Vertebroplasty NOT recommended , kyphoplasty maybe (balloon then cement)</div>
RC 2016 - What are 3 findings of spondylotic cervical myelopathy in the upper extremity?
<ul> <li>JAAOS - 2015 - Update on diagnosis and management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy</li> <ul> <li>Motor</li> <ul> <li>Difficulty with fine motor tasks (buttons, keys)</li> <li>Myelopathy hand:</li> <ul> <li>Loss of power of adduction and extension of ulnar two digits</li> <li>Inability to grasp and release rapidly (<20 abnormal)</li> </ul> <li>Finger escape sign --> ulnar two digits drift into abduction</li> </ul> <li>Reflexes</li> <ul> <li>Hoffman Reflex</li> <li>Inverted brachioradialis reflex (hand goes down instead of up)</li> <li>Hyper-reflexia</li> </ul> </ul></ul>
<div>RC 2016 - What are 3 findings of spondylotic cervical myelopathy in the lower extremity?</div>
<ul> <li>Motor</li> <ul> <li>Wide based, ataxic gait</li> <li>Difficulty with Tandem gait, Rhomberg Sign</li> </ul> <li>Reflexes</li> <ul> <li>Hyper-reflexia</li><li>Clonus</li> <li>Babinski sign (up-going toes)</li> </ul></ul>
<div><br></br></div>
<div>RC 2012 - Patient presents with cervical myelopathy and upper motor neuron signs. All of the following are UMN signs except?</div>
<ol> <li>Scapulohumeral reflex </li> <li>Jaw jerk </li> <li>Hoffmans </li> <li>Babinski</li></ol>
2.<div><ul> <li>Jaw Jerk tests CN V</li> <ul> <li>Tap on mandible below lips –> masseter muscles jerk mandible upwards</li> <li>Usually pretty minimal, unless hyperreflexia present</li> <li>Indicates UMN lesions but must be above spinal cord</li> <li>Only DTR above the foramen magnum</li> </ul> <li>Scapulohumeral Reflex:</li> <ul> <li>Tap spine near medial acromion</li> <li>Scapula elevates and/or arm abducts = abnormal if hyperactive</li> <li>Indicates C1-3 compression</li> </ul></ul></div>
<div>Patient with hyperreflexia and ataxic gait. MRI shows L4/5 severe spinal stenosis. What is the next step? </div>
<ol> <li>Posterior decompression </li> <li>MRI C+T spine </li> <li>Fuse L4/5 </li> <li>Physio</li></ol>
b.dont be dumb.
<div>RC 2015 - All of the following are true regarding a thoracic disc herniation, except:</div>
<ol> <li>Resect the T9 rib head for a T8/9 disc</li> <li>Less common than cervical and lumbar disc degeneration</li> <li>Should be addressed with a posterior laminectomy</li> <li>May show calcifications on CT</li></ol>
C. historical<div><ul> <li>T8/T9 level means the T9 rib is in the way (it articulates with the superior costal facet (on the T9 pedible)</li><li>JAAOS 2000 - Thoracic Disc Disease</li> <ul> <li>The frequency of morbidity associated with posterior laminectomy has led to the abandonment of this technique</li> </ul> <li>Calcifications very common with thoracic disc herniations</li> <ul> <li>May indicate adhesions b/w disc and dura OR an intradural location</li> <li>can make removal tricky</li> <li>found in 45-70% of symptomatic herniated discs (10% incidence in asymptomatic)</li> </ul></ul></div>
<div>RC 2008 - Which of the following structures contain free nerve endings:</div>
<ol> <li>PLL, Annulus, Facet joint capsule </li> <li>Joint capsule, Annulus</li> <li>Annulus fibrosis and Nucleus pulposis</li> <li>Annulus, Nucleus, PLL, joint capsule</li></ol>
A.<div><div>Pacini endings concentrated around facet joint capsules and ventrolateral surface of the annlus fibrosus, free nerve endings found in the ALL and PLL, none found in nucleus pulposis</div></div>
<div>RC 2010: What is true about the degenerative disc disease?</div>
<div>a. It transfers more stress to the facet joints</div>
<div>b. Increase in Type II collagen in the annulus fibrosis and the nucleus pulposus </div>
<div>c. There is an increase in chondroitin to keratin sulfate ratio</div>
A. as the disc collapses you then transfer more stress to the facet joints.<div><br></br></div><div>B - false. Get an increase in Type I cartilage, nucleous was mostly type II, but being taken over by fibrocartilage, so increase in type I (like the annulus)</div><div>c - false. there is an increase in keratin<br></br><div> <div></div> <div>From Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (JAAOS, 2012) – Disk space narrowing and loss of the normal shock absorptive capacity of the spinal segment results in an increased transfer of stress to the facet joints, which accelerates facet joint cartilage degeneration and osteophyte formation. 5,7 Facet joint hypertrophy, infolding of the ligamentum flavum, and development of bulging disk osteophyte complexes all contribute to circumferential narrowing of the central spinal canal and<b> lateral recesses, that is, the area of the spine bordered by the superior articular facet posteriorly, the disk and vertebral body anteriorly, the thecal sac medially, and the pedicle laterally.</b></div> <div></div> <div><br></br></div></div><div><br></br></div></div>
<div>RC 2015 - List 6 causes of spondylolisthesis?</div>
<ul> <li>Wiltse Classification:</li> <ul> <li>Isthmic (nonunion, elongation, acute fracture)</li> <li>Degenerative</li> <li>Traumatic</li> <li>Dysplastic (ie. Congenital)</li> <li>Iatrogenic</li> <li>Pathologic</li> </ul></ul>