Peds - RC Q's Flashcards
RC 2009 What volume of crystalloid do you bolus a peds trauma pt (in cc/kg)? <ol> <li>10</li> <li>20</li> <li>30</li> <li>40</li></ol>
2.
<div>RC 2016 In a 6 month old, list 4 radiographic features suggesting DDH</div>
“Acetabulum: AI>25, rounded edges, poorly defined/widened teardrop, Lateral CEA <20<div>Femoral head: delayed ossification, assymetric, small nuclei</div><div>Others: break in shenton’s line, not in infeormedial corner of hilgenreiner’s and perkins line</div>”
RC 2017 Name 8 risk factors for Pavlik harness failure.
<ul> <li>Patient Factors</li> <ul> <li>Pts with soft tissue or neuro disease (Pavlik is contraindicated!)</li> <ul> <li>myelodysplasia, CP or arthrogryposis</li> <li>Ehlers-Danlos</li> </ul> <li>Bilaterality</li> <li>Initial instability on presentation</li> <li>High-grade/severe dislocation</li> <li>Age at treatment initiation (>3 months)</li> <li>Male</li> <li>Compliance</li> </ul> <li>Imaging factors</li> <ul> <li>low % coverage of femoral head</li> <li>low alpha angle</li> <li>increased distance b/w middle of proximal metaphyseal border and Hilgenreiner’s line</li> <ul> <li>JPO 2009 - Predictive Factors for Unsuccessful Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip by the Pavlik Harness</li> </ul> <li>increased distance b/w middle of metaphyseal border and ischial line</li> </ul></ul>
<div>RC 2015, 16 - What are 3 radiographic findings of ischemic necrosis of the femoral head following DDH treatment? </div>
Salter Criteria<div><ul> <li>Head:</li> <ul> <li>Failure of appearance or growth of ossific nucleus at 1 year after reduction</li> <li>Increased density and fragmentation of ossified femoral head</li> </ul> </ul> <ul> <li>Physis</li> <ul> <li>Premature physeal closure</li> </ul> <li>Fem Neck</li> <ul> <li>Broadening of femoral neck</li> <li>Shortening of the femoral neck</li> </ul> <li>Residual deformity</li> <ul> <li>Coxa magna, plana, coxa vara, broad fem neck</li> </ul> <li>Proximal Femur</li> <ul> <li>Greater trochanter overgrowth</li> </ul></ul></div>
<div>RC 2010 - Unilateral DDH in 8 month old, what is the most important clinical sign?</div>
<div>Range of motion (ROM) testing of the hip is important; a decrease in abduction is the most sensitive test result for DDH.</div>
<div>ROM will be normal in children younger than 6 months however, because contractures will not yet have developed</div>
RC 2010 - List 5 Blocks to reduction in DDH in 10 month old?
Extra-articular: iliopsoas, AL, capsule<div>Intra-articular: pulvinar (fatty tissue in acetabulum), inverted labrum, hypertrophied ligamentum teres and TAL</div>
<div>RC 2013 - All of the following pelvic osteotomies have normal articular cartilage articulating with head except</div>
<ol> <li>Dega</li> <li>Bernase PAO</li> <li>Chiari</li> <li>Salter</li></ol>
“C - chiari is SALVAGE<div><br></br></div><div><img></img><br></br></div>”
RC 2012, 14 SCFE; when is the child predisposed to having the screw head impinge on the labrum?<div><ol> <li>2 screws</li> <li>1 screw if screw head is medial to the intertrochanteric line</li> <li>if screw head is distal to LT</li> <li>screw distal to apophysis</li></ol></div>
B.
<div>RC 2012 SCFE what is true?</div>
<ol> <li>Two and one screw have the same risk of penetration</li> <li>Two and one screw have the same rate of chondrolysis</li> <li>Two screws has more torsional rigidity</li> <li>Higher risk of chondrolysis when using fully threaded screw</li></ol>
C
RC 2011, 14, 16 - Give 4 indications for consideration of prophylactic pinning of the opposite hip in a child with SCFE.
“Young age (open TRC, age < 10 years)<div>Endocrinopathy</div><div>Renal Disease</div><div>History of radiation (MCQ ‘17)</div><div>High risk of poor follow up (?)<br></br></div>”
<div>RC 2017 - 8 year old presents with right hip pain, afebrile, labs normal. Past medical history significant for leukemia treated with whole body radiation, now in remission. Radiographs shown have an unusual SCFE</div>
<ol> <li>Bilateral in situ pins</li> <li>MRA of femoral heads</li> <li>Biopsy</li> <li>Antibiotics</li></ol>
A. hx of radiation
<ul> <li>RC 2012 - List 2 radiographic risk factors for SCFE development?</li><ul> </ul> </ul>
<ul><li>JAAOS 2006 - SCFE/AAOS Core Review</li><ul><li>Deep acetabulum</li><li>Increased physeal obliquity</li><li>decreased neck-shaft angle (coxa vara)</li><li>Decreased femoral anteversion</li></ul></ul>
RC 2013 - What are 3 endocrine conditions associated with SCFE?
“Hypothyroidism (high TSH)<div>Hyperparathyroidism<br></br><div>Renal osteodystrophy (high BUN/Cr)</div><div>Panhypopituitarism</div><div>GH deficiency treated with growth hormone</div><div><br></br></div><div><br></br></div><div>Down’s at risk of SCFE given hypoT</div></div>”
<div>RC 2013 - SCFE, all is true EXCEPT</div>
<ol> <li>Only occurs in a narrow age range</li> <li>Pin penetration proved to cause chondrolysis</li> <li>A chronic slip that has been pinned. Better to wait a few years before an osteotomy procedure.</li> <li>30% in the general population and 70% of renal etiology will have a bilateral slip on initial presentation</li></ol>
C - want to do osteotomy early<div><br></br></div><div>D - true</div>
<div>RC 2018, 15, 16 - In patients with Perthes, all of these will benefit from a varus derotation osteotomy, except:</div>
<ol> <li>8 yo with Herring B </li> <li>7 yo with lateralized/subluxed hip</li> <li>Epiphyseal slip-in angle >20%</li> <li>Performing the osteotomy during initial or fragmentation phase of disease</li></ol>
Answer: B<div><div>A - will benefit</div> <div>B - indicates <b>hinge abduction</b> - ie needs a VALGUS osteotomy and not a VDRO</div> <div>C - Epiphyseal slip-in angle/index >20% is a good sign</div> <div>D- earlier better</div></div><div><br></br></div>
<div>RC EXAM - Prognostic factors for Perthes - all except</div>
<ol> <li>Age</li> <li>Gender</li> <li>ROM</li> <li>Extent of head involvement</li></ol>
“C.<div><div>"”The lateral pillar classification (p < 0.0001) and the age at the onset of the disease (p = 0.0001) were both strong prognostic factors. Female patients did significantly worse than male patients if they were over the age of 8.0 years at the onset of the disease (p = 0.004).</div></div><div><br></br></div><div><br></br></div><div>RF FOR DEVELOPING PERTHES:</div><div><ul><li>positive family history</li><li>low birth weight</li><li>abnormal birth presentation</li><li>second hand smoke</li><li>Asian, Inuit, and Central European decent</li></ul></div>”
<div>RC 2018, 10, 11, 13,... - List 4 clinical or radiographic factors associated with poor prognosis in Perthes</div>
“<ul> <li>Clinical</li> <ul> <li>Female</li> <li>Presentation >6 years</li> <li>Decreased hip ROM</li> </ul> </ul> <ul> <li>Radiographic - rmr classification systems!</li> <ul> <li>Lateral Pillar Classification B/C, C</li> <li>Two or more Catterall ““Head at Risk””</li> <ul> <li>Horizontal Physis</li> <li>Metaphyseal Cysts</li> <li>Lateral Subluxation</li> <li>Gage Sign - V shaped cyst in lateral physis</li> <li>Lateral Calcification</li> </ul> <li>Premature physeal closure</li> <li>Extent of subchondral fracture = whole head involvement</li> <li>Extent of femoral head/acetabular deformity at maturity</li> </ul></ul>”
RC 2012 - 9 yr Boy perthes, with Herring B (they said Herring B) hip. What is the best option for management? <ol> <li>Observation</li> <li>ROM</li> <li>Containment surgery with either a femoral, pelvic or both </li> <li>Petrie casting</li></ol>
3.<div><div>Surgical treatment better in kids > 8, lateral pillar B, B/C</div></div>
<div>RC 2011, 2014 - Give 6 causes of acquired coxa vara in pediatric patient</div>
“<ul> <li>Idiopathic: Perthes/AVN, SCFE</li> <li>Metabolic: Rickets</li> <li>Infectious: Septic Arthritis/Osteomyelitis</li> <li>Trauma: fem neck #, fem head dislocation</li> <li>Neoplastic: Fibrous Dysplasia</li> <li>Skeletal Dysplasia</li> <li>Pathologic Bone: OI</li> </ul> <div><img></img></div>”
<div>RC 2011 - All are true about reasons to operate for coxa vara except? </div>
<ol> <li>HE angle > 60°</li> <li>Trendelenberg gait</li> <li>pain</li> <li>neck shaft of 110 deg</li></ol>
“D. N-S angle <90-100deg is indication for OR<div><br></br></div><div><ul> <li>Indications: RC EXAM</li> <ul> <li>Symptomatic limp, Trendelenburg gait or progressive deformity</li> <li>HE Angle > 60o</li> <li>Progressive decrease in neck-shaft angle to 90-100o</li></ul></ul><div>Tx: Valgus osteotomy +/- adductor tenotomy</div><div><br></br></div><div>Goal: Normal H-E angle = 16 Degrees (shoot for this, although <38 deg will only lead to 5% recurrence)<br></br></div><div><br></br></div><div><img></img><br></br></div></div>”
<div>RC 2014, 2010 - All of the following are indicated in the management of a unilateral congenital knee dislocation in a newborn EXCEPT?</div>
<ol> <li>U/S of hips</li> <li>Serial casting</li> <li>Pavlik harness</li> <li>Open reduction</li></ol>
<div>C.</div>
<div>In the setting of a dislocated knee and hip, knee hyperextesion makes treatment in a Pavlik harness difficult and nearly impossible. The knee should be promptly addressed with manipulation and serial flexion casting. With knee flexion obtained, the patient should then be placed in a Pavlik harness with the knee flexed as simultaneous treatment of the hip and knee<br></br></div>
<div><br></br></div>
<div><br></br></div>
“<div>RC 2012 - List 4 radiographic risk factors for progression of infantile Blount’s</div>”
<ul> <li>Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal Angle > 16 deg</li> <li>Multi-planar Deformity (varus, procurvatum of proximal tibia, IR of proximal tibia)</li> <li>Higher Langenskiold classification</li> <ul> <li>epiphysis: Medial sloping, joint depression</li><li>physis: Physeal bar across medial physis, Irregular/widened medial physis</li><li>metaphysis: Beaking of proximal medial tibial metaphysis</li> </ul></ul>
<div>RC 2014 - A 16 month old healthy boy presents to your clinic with bowlegs. He ambulates appropriate for age, and is in the 60th percentile for his height and weight. You are shown an x-ray with varus knees, no abnormalities other than perhaps very slight beaking, metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle is measured and given to you at 12 degrees. What should you do?</div>
<ol> <li>Observe and follow up appointment</li> <li>KAFO</li> <li>Guided growth</li> <li>Proximal tibial osteotomy</li></ol>
A<div>Normal MDA is <10, at risk MDA 10-16</div><div>Treatment: <3 yrs, grade 1-2 –> observe or brace</div><div>>4 years, grade 3+ –> surgery<br></br></div>
<div>RC 2009, 2010 - 26 month old child. Tibia vara with MDA angle of 19o. What do you do?</div>
<ol> <li>Rigid KAFO</li> <li>Extra-articular Osteotomy</li> <li>Intra-articular Osteotomy</li> <li>Hinged Knee Brace</li></ol>
A<div><div>MDA>16, but <4 years of age = BRACE = KAFO</div></div>
<div>RC 2016 - In adolescent blounts disease, all are true about guided growth EXCEPT?</div>
<ol> <li>Poor outcomes for BMI > 35</li> <li>Dependent on growth remaining</li> <li>It is associated with a high rate of hardware failure</li> <li>Treatment has poor results in children over age 12</li></ol>
D.<div><ul><li>Funk SS (JPO 2016) Hemiepiphysiodesis Implants for Late-onset Tibia Vara</li> <ul> <li>60% surgical failure (required repeat OR for osteotomy, revision surgery, mechanical axis deviation > 40mm)</li> <ul> <li>Risk factors BMI >35, increased deformity (MAD >80mm)</li> <li>Higher risk of implant failure in younger kids</li> </ul> </ul></ul></div>
<div>RC 2017 - You are called to the nursery to see a newborn with a foot deformity. Given clinical pictures and radiographs of posteromedial bowing. What should you advise the parents?</div>
<div>A. Will need serial casting</div>
<div>B. Should have amputation</div>
<div>C. Osteotomy for re-alignment</div>
<div>D. Will need to be followed for leg length discrepancy</div>
D.<div><div>We recommend all the children with CPMBT to be followed up periodically till skeletal maturity, to identify cases with residual bowing, ankle deformity, muscle weakness, and limb length inequality as active surgical intervention may be needed to correct these problems.</div></div><div><br></br></div>
<div>RC 2016 - A 1 year old child is referred to your clinic with a severe LLD. Radiographs demonstrate absence of the tibia, femoral condylar hypoplasia. No active extension demonstrated. What is the best management? </div>
<div></div>
<ol> <li>Fibular transfer to create a single bone lower limb </li> <li>Through knee amputation </li> <li>Symes amputation </li> <li>MRI to assess for residual tibial anlage</li></ol>
“2.<div><br></br></div><div>No extensor mechanism - amp!</div><div><ul> <li>Treatment Principles:</li> <ul> <li>Type 1 –> knee disarticulation (no extensor mechanism)</li> <ul> <li>Brown Procedure:</li> <ul> <li>Centralization of the fibula under the femur</li> <li>Requires an extensor mechanism</li> </ul> </ul> <li>Type 2 –> proximal tibfib synostosis with Syme amputation</li> <li>Type 3 –> Syme amputation</li> <li>Type 4 –> centralize foot</li> </ul></ul></div><div><img></img><br></br></div>”
<div>RC 2014, 2012 Regarding a Syme amputation, all are true EXCEPT?</div>
<div>a. Rigid socket is not necessary for good function</div>
<div>b. Long lever arm provides for good function</div>
<div>c. Often need a shoe lift on the contralateral side</div>
<div>d. Posterior migration of the heel pad may prevent weight-bearing</div>
C. shoe lift is needed for BOYD.<div><br></br></div><div><br></br></div>
<div>RC 2018 - What is deformity of typical clubfoot position?</div>
<div>a.Pronation, forefoot adduction, varus hindfoot, plantar flexed</div>
<div>b.Pronation, forefoot adduction, valgus hindfoot, plantar flexed</div>
<div>c.Pronation, forefoot abduction, varus hindfoot, dorsiflexed</div>
<div>d.Pronation, forefoot adduction, valgus hindfoot, dorsiflexed</div>
A.<div><br></br></div><div>CAVE P</div><div>midfoot cavus and pronation</div><div>forefoot adductus</div><div>hindfoot varus and equinus</div>
<div>RC 2018, 2011 - 2 yr old treated for previous treated for idiopathic club foot with ponsetti casting. He now presents with intoeing gait and has dynamic supination with gait? What is the best method of treatment?</div>
<ol> <li>tib ant transfer</li> <li>tib post transfer</li> <li>re cast </li> <li>med calc osteotomy</li></ol>
- recast if <2 years
<div>RC 2009 - Residual deformity after clubfoot treatment. Which has the worst functional outcome?</div>
<ol> <li>Weak gastroc / residual hindfoot deformity</li> <li>Hindfoot varus / forefoot adductus</li> <li>Forefoot adductus</li> <li>Residual hindfoot deformity / equinus contracture</li></ol>
D.<div><br></br></div><div><div>The most significant limitations in these treated clubfeet averaged (a) a 42% decrease in normal ankle motion, specifically lacking 65% of normal dorsiflexion, a consistent finding independent of treatment</div></div>
<div>RC 2008 - Adult with treatment of foot condition with casting and surgery. Now has flat top talus. What was the condition: (2008)</div>
<ol> <li>TEV</li> <li>CVT</li></ol>
A<div><br></br></div><div><div>Flat-top talus has been described as a pathologic change secondary to idiopathic clubfoot condition and/or as a direct result of nonoperative manipulation involving forced dorsiflexion and molding of the cartilaginous talus. (foot ankle International)</div></div>
<div>RC 2013 - 8 yo with cavus foot and pronated 1st ray with significant symptoms for at least 3 months. Coleman block test with correctable hindfoot. Best treatment</div>
<ol> <li>Lateralalizing calcaneus osteotomy</li> <li>Posteromedial release</li> <li>1st MT dorsiflexion osteotomy and plantar release</li> <li>Molded plantar orthosis</li></ol>
- forefoot driven given Coleman block test –> needs forefoot procedure.<div><br></br></div><div>Similar Q… What is the best management?</div><div> <ol> <li>Plantar fascia and 1st MT osteotomy</li> <li>Calcaneal osteotomy and FDL transfer</li> <li>Observe</li> <li>Orthosis – as initial management</li></ol> <ol> <li>SIGH. </li> </ol><ul> <li>If NORMAL kid and mild deformity –> non-op</li> <li>If NEURO kid –> Op</li> <li>ANSWER: A</li> </ul></div>
<div>RC 2008 - What is the main advantage of a closing wedge cuboid osteotomy over lateral calcaneal slide for cavus foot with metatarsus adductus?</div>
<ol> <li>Higher rate of union</li> <li>Better cosmesis</li> <li>Better correction of forefoot deformity</li> <li>Better correction of hindfoot deformity</li></ol>
- osteotomy should be through the CORA<div><br></br></div><div><div>Shortening the lateral column will correct all elements of the deformity much better than a lateral calcaneal slide.</div><div><br></br></div><div><br></br></div></div>
<div>RC 2015 - What orthotic will you prescribe for a 16yo boy with a subtle cavus foot (4 points)?</div>
<ul> <li>Custom, full length, semi-rigid orthotic</li> <li>Recessed first ray</li> <li>Lowered medial arch</li> <li>Lateral hindfoot wedge or post</li> <li>Heel cushion</li></ul>
<div>RC 2015 - 12yo girl with persistent pain and disability 6mos after an ankle sprain. Apart from fibular collateral ligament injury, what findings will you find on XR or MRI (5 points)</div>
<ul> <li>X-ray:</li> <ul> <li>Subtle cavus foot</li> <li>Tarsal Coalition</li> <li>Anterior process of calcaneus fracture</li> <li>Lateral talar process fracture</li> <li>5th metatarsal fracture</li> </ul> </ul>
<ul> <li>MRI</li> <ul> <li>Peroneal tendon injury</li> <li>Syndesmotic Ligament Injury</li> <li>Osteochondral fragment</li> </ul></ul>
<div>RC 2016 - What is true in congenital vertical talus?</div>
<ol> <li>Idiopathic and syndromic cases require casting</li> <li>Doesn’t require TAL</li> <li>Pinning of the TN joint is rarely indicated</li> <li>The calcaneus is in dorsiflexion</li></ol>
“A<div><br></br></div><div>D - calc and talus are both in equinus.</div><div>B/D - Tx: Reverse ponsetti casting (Dobb’s) with plantar flexion and inversion followed by pinning of TN with K-wire and TAL<br></br></div>”
<div>RC 2012 - What is an Anatomic Description of CTV?</div>
<ul><ul> </ul></ul>
<ul><li>JAAOS 2015 - Congenital Vertical Talus</li><ul><li>Dorsal dislocation of the navicular on the talar head</li><ul><li>Hypoplastic and wedge shaped</li></ul><li>Hindfoot is equinus and valgus</li><li>Midfoot and forefoot are dorsiflexed and abducted</li></ul></ul>
<div>RC 2012 - What is an anatomic description of CVT</div>
<ol> <li>Dorsolateral dislocation of the foot on the talus</li> <li>Equinus</li> <li>Cavovarus foot</li></ol>
A<div><br></br></div><div>irreducible dorsolateral navicular dislocation</div><div>vertically oriented talus</div><div>calcaneal eversion with attenuated spring ligament<br></br></div>
<div>RC 2011 - What is a classic feature of CVT?</div>
<ol> <li>calcaneus is dorsiflexed</li> <li>contracted Achilles tendon</li> <li>contracted Post tib tendon</li> <li>hind foot in varus, inverted</li></ol>
Answer: B<div><br></br></div><div>1-calc and talus are PF</div><div>3-tib post is subluzed over medial mal (thus a dorsiflexor)</div><div>4-hindfoot in valgus</div>
RC 2013, 2012 List 3 components of minimally invasive treatment of idiopathic congenital vertical talus.
<ul> <li>Serial Casting with Reverse Ponsetti Method (plantarflexion and inversion stretching)</li> <li>Percutaneous Achilles Tenotomy</li> <li>Percutaneous pinning of talonavicular joint</li> <li>Boots and bars (feet at 0deg)</li></ul>
<div>RC 2018, 2016 - What is true when comparing the Triple-C osteotomy and an Evans lateral column lengthening for the treatment of pediatric flatfoot? (variation of this 2015, 2016 - see below)</div>
<div>a.The Evans procedure is better at correcting talar head coverage or talonavicular coverage </div>
<div>b.Triple C has is associated with higher complications than Evans</div>
<div>c.A complication of Triple C is CC joint subluxation</div>
A.<div><div>The calcaneal-lengthening osteotomy achieves better improvement of the relationship of the navicular to the head of the talus but it is associated with more frequent and more severe complications.</div></div>
<div>RC 2015, 2016 What is part of the Evans procedure for a pediatric idiopathic flexible flatfoot:</div>
<div>A) Temporarily stabilize the CC and TN joints</div>
<div>B) 50% increase of fusion rate with autogenous bone graft</div>
<div>C) Can correct forefoot supination with opening wedge osteotomy of the medial cuneiform</div>
<div>D) Osteotomy of anterior process should be 4mm proximal to the CC joint</div>
<div>ANSWER: C - Mosca modification was classifically closing wedge, but you could do an opening wedge to address supination</div>
<div><br></br></div>
<div>GROUP CONSENSUS</div>
<div><br></br></div>
<div>A- false (only temporarily stability CC joint)</div>
<div>B - equivalent results auto=allograft</div>
<div>C - true</div>
<div>D - false (osteotomy should be 1.5cm prox)</div>
<div>RC 2017 - 8 year old has a flexible flat foot. What is true?</div>
<div>A) Most can be managed with orthotics</div>
<div>B) Surgical plan would consist of soft tissue procedures</div>
<div>C) 30% have short Achilles</div>
C. short Achilles tendon accounted for 27% of the flat feet and was characterized by restricted ankle dorsiflexion.<div><br></br></div><div>A - orthotics dont help</div><div>B - surgery is often boney procedures</div>
<div>RC 2010 - Child with multiple ankle sprains treated non-operatively. Pain in anterolateral aspect of ankle and symptoms for 3 months. No pain with ADLs. Unable to run more than 20 minutes. You are told that he has a tarsal coalition. List 2 treatment options at this time?</div>
Non-op<div>Orthotic/Immobilize with cast</div><div>Activity modification</div><div>NSAIDs</div>
<div>RC 2011, 2014 What is not true about tarsal coalitions?</div>
<ol> <li>MRI is best for cross sectional size estimate</li> <li>talo-calcaneal common</li> <li>best see the calcaneonavicular coalition on an oblique xray</li> <li>may have non-bony coalition</li></ol>
A. CT is gold standard.
<div>RC 2015 Given x-ray of a ball and socket ankle. What is the underlying pathology?</div>
<ol> <li>Ehlers-Danlos</li> <li>Post traumatic</li> <li>Lateral ligament instability</li> <li>Tarsal coalition</li></ol>
D.
RC 2012 - 4 year old presents with toe walking, which is true? <div>A. Thought to have autosomal dominant inheritance</div> <div>B. Most are due to neurologic etiology</div> <div>C. Usually resolve without treatment</div>
“A.<div><br></br></div><div>B. most idiopathic</div><div><div> <div> <div><img></img></div> </div></div></div><div><div>C = false. resolve before 2 years, not >2.</div><div>No change in ankle ROM @ final f/u and 25% improvement in gait</div></div>”
<div>RC 2008 12 y.o. with diastomatomyelia and an associated calcaneovalgus foot. What is the treatment?</div>
<ol> <li>Non-op, aggressive physio and AFO</li> <li>Peroneus brevis to longus transfer</li> <li>Tib Ant to calcaneus transfer</li> <li>Split posterior tibialis transfer</li></ol>
ANSWER: A<br></br><div><br></br></div><div>Calcaneovalgus foot is often L5 level, surgery can involve Tib ant to calcaneus. NONOP to start of course</div>
“<div>RC 2011, 2014- Give 3 findings in the cervical spine in a patient with Down’s Syndrome</div>”
AAI<div>Atlanto-occipital instability (Rare)</div><div>Odontoid hypoplasia, Os odontoideum, Persistent dentocentral synchonrosis</div><div><br></br></div>
<div>RC 2013, 2016 - All are true about the cervical spine in Down’s syndrome, EXCEPT: </div>
<ol> <li>Instability occurs only at the atlantoaxial level</li> <li>Cervical spine xrays have no predictive value of future spine problems</li> <li>In kids, if the patient is asymptomatic, they do not require screening prior to most sports participation</li> <li>25% of Down’s patients have cervical spine problems</li></ol>
A.<div><br></br></div><div>A - false: AAI and Atlanto-occipital are not uncommon</div><div>B - true</div><div>C - true. only screen HIGH RISK activities</div><div>D - true. 30%</div>
RC Oral - Diagnostic Criteria for NF?
<div>At least 2 of:</div>
<div>Mnemonic: CAFÉ-SPOT</div>
<ul> <li>Café au lait spots (coast of california, smooth)</li> <li>Axillary and inguinal freckling</li> </ul>
<ul> <li>neuroFibromas</li> </ul>
<ul> <li>Eye (lisch nodules)</li> <li>Skeletal abnormality (bowing/thinning of long bone, pseudoarthrosis of tibia)</li> <li>Positive Family History</li> <li>Optic Tumor (optic glioma)</li></ul>
<div><br></br></div>
<div>Other Manifestations of NF?</div>
<div><ul><li>HEENT: 75% have learning disabilities, 33% have psychiatric disorders</li> <li>CVS: Increased risk for stroke, aortic stenosis, hypertension, congenital heart disease and vasculopathy</li> <li>Hypertension secondary to pheochromocytoma or renal artery stenosis<br></br></li> <ul> <li>Risk factor for early death</li> </ul> <li>Metabolic bone disease secondary to hypophosphatemic osteomalacia</li> <ul> <li>48% osteopenic</li> <li>25% osteoporotic</li> <li>Lowest BMD in lumbar spine</li> </ul> <li>Precocious puberty (CNS lesion)</li> <li>Short stature in 13-40%</li></ul></div>
<div>RC 2018, 2013 - All of the following about neurofibromatosis scoliosis are true except:</div>
<ol> <li>In a dystrophic curve, the Cobb angle is not predictive of progression</li> <li>Dystrophic curves are most common </li> <li>If scoliosis presents younger than age 8, 70% will become dystrophic</li> <li>Associated with dural ectasia</li></ol>
B. dystrophic scoliosis is less common but more severe<div><ul> <li>Early age of onset (<7yo)</li> <li>Apical vertebra severely rotated</li> <li>Scalloped bone (concave loss of bone)</li> <li>Middle to lower thoracic area</li></ul></div>
<div>RC 2012 - Conditions associated with NF-1; all except</div>
<ol> <li>Hypertension</li> <li>Malignant CNS tumor</li> <li>Short stature</li> <li>Acoustic Neuroma</li></ol>
D. Acoustic Neuroma is NF-2<div><br></br></div><div>malignant CNS tumour</div>
<div>RC 2014, 2016 - Which of the following factors is NOT true regarding NF-1?</div>
<ol> <li>If father has the gene, worse for patient than if mother has the gene </li> <li>50% sporadic mutation </li> <li>6% tibial pseudarthrosis rate </li> <li>short stature</li></ol>
A. worse if mom has it<div><br></br></div><div>B - 50% sporatic is true, also Auto Dom.</div>
<div>RC 2011 - What are 4 MRI findings of a patient with scoliosis and neurofibromatosis?</div>
MRI specific<ol> <li>Dural Ectasia (circumferential dilation/widening of the thecal sac, can lead to meningocele)</li> <li>Dumbbell Lesion (neurofibroma on nerve root)</li> <li>Paraspinal masses (plexiform neurofibromatosis)</li><li>intracanal neurofibromas</li></ol><div>In general - ie X-ray included</div><div><ul> <li>Posterior Vertebral scalloping</li> <li>Penciling ribs</li> <li>Rotation of ribs (look like twisted ribbons)</li> <li>Enlarged vertebral foramen (from the dumbbell lesion)</li> <li>Dysplastic Pedicles</li> <li>Spindling of the TPs</li> <li><b>Short, Sharp, kyphotic curve</b></li> <li><b>Severe rotation of apical vertebra</b></li></ul></div>
RC 2012, 2011, 2008 12 yr F with # radius. Comes back with a dystrophic looking pseudoarthrosis. What would you find on exam? <ol> <li>hypoplastic thumb</li> <li>café au lait spots</li> <li>absent pec major</li> <li>Clinodactyly</li></ol>
B. 50% of forearm pseudarthosis are associated with NF1 (but only a small percentage of NF1 get forearm pseudarthrosis)
RC 2011 - What are three conditions that have dural ectasia?
NF<div>OI</div><div>Marfans</div><div>EDS</div><div>AS</div><div>Acromegaly</div>
<div>RC 2016 - All of the following genetics and tumor syndromes have been found to be associated, except:</div>
<ol> <li>Retinoblastoma (Rp-1) and osteosarcoma</li> <li>NF-1 and malignant central nervous system tumors</li> <li>EXT-1 and EXT-2 and multiple osteochondromas</li> <li>Chromosomal translocation and Ewing family of tumors</li></ol>
- NF 1 assx with MPNST<div><br></br></div><div>1. true Rb and OS</div><div>3. true EXT and MHE</div><div>4. true EWS FLI1 and Ewings</div>
<div>RC 2012 Tumor associations; all except:</div>
<ol> <li>Retinoblastoma (it said RF-1) is associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma</li> <li>Neurofibrillin (NF-1) gene is associated with malignant nerve tumors</li> <li>MET with Chondrosarcoma</li> <li>NF and Astrocytoma</li></ol>
C.<div>Retinoblastoma definitely associated with osteosarcoma è A is True <div></div> <div>JAAOS 2010 Orthopaedic manifestations of Neurofibromatosis type I</div> NF associated with MPNST (10-24% lifetime risk) è B is True Optic pathway gliomas affects 6% of patients = low grade pilocytic astrocytomas è D is True<br></br></div>
<div>RC 2011- 9 year old with CP is a community ambulator with forearm crutches at home and at school but uses a wheelchair for long distances. What is his GMFCS?</div>
<div>A) I</div>
<div>B) II</div>
<div>C) III</div>
<div>D) IV</div>
C.<div>1-essentially normal</div><div>2-railing for stairs</div><div>3 - wheelchair for distances</div><div>4-wheelchair for most</div><div>5- wheelchair dependent</div>
<div>RC 2009 - All are drugs for systemic CP spasticity except</div>
<ol> <li>Botox</li> <li>Dantrolene</li> <li>Baclofen</li> <li>Clonazepam</li></ol>
- botox acts locally<div>all the rest act systemically</div>
<div>RC 2008 - CP kid which is not a good prognostic factor</div>
<div>a. hand head to knee in 5 sec</div>
<div>b. IQ >90</div>
<div>c. ability to differentiate textures</div>
<div>d. 2 point <10mm</div>
“B<div>poor wording. maybe ‘IQ is not a prognostic factor’ at all</div>”
<div>RC 2016 - What is the most reliable method for following CP hips? </div>
<ol> <li>Acetabular index </li> <li>Center edge angle </li> <li>Migration index </li> <li>Tonnis angle</li></ol>
“3.<div>MI>33 - subluxed - consider OR mx<br></br><div><br></br></div><div>Draw out perkins and hilgenreiner’s lines</div><div><img></img><br></br></div></div>”
<div>RC 2015 - 9yo boy with cerebral palsy. Ambulatory with flexible equinovarus deformity. Failed AFO and PT. Weightbearing on lateral border of foot. Persistent pain and wants to discuss operative treatment.</div>
<div><div>(1) What muscles contribute to the deformity?</div></div>
<div>(2) What test would help in diagnosis?</div>
<div>(3) What operative intervention would you suggest?</div>
(1) Tibialis anterior and tibialis posterior = cavus; Gastroc/Achilles = equinus<div>(2) Gait analysis, EMG, confusion test</div><div>(3) Split tib ant transfer to lateral cuneiform/cuboid</div> <div>Posterior Tibialis fractional lengthening</div> <div>Gastroc resection/ Achilles lengthening</div>
<div>RC 2010 Who is a poor Candidate for tendon transfers in CP? </div>
<ol> <li>Athetoid</li> <li>Diplegic</li> <li>Quadriplegic</li></ol>
A. poor control.<div><div>Best candidates for surgery are patients with hemiplegia, good voluntary control, motivation, and sensation</div></div>
RC 2011 - which factor in CP, particularly in athetosis, is a contraindication to tendon transfers <ol> <li>Profound weakness of all muscle groups</li> <li>Poor voluntary control of transferred muscle</li> <li>Astereognosis</li> <li>Poor sensation</li></ol>
“2.<div>Among the cases with cerebral paralysis (CP), the most appropriate group for surgical intervention is the spastic group. Due to the challenges of performance and unpredictability of the results, surgery and especially dynamic tendon transfers are not recommended for the dyskinetic cases.</div><div><br></br></div><div><img></img><br></br></div><div><ul> <li>Spastic (65-80%) –> involves the cortex; pyramidal</li> <ul> <li>Increased tone or rigidity with rapid stretch</li> <li>Pyramidal dysfunction</li> <li>Associated with periventricular leucomalacia (PVL) on MRI</li> <li>Most often benefit from surgery</li> </ul> <li>Dyskinetic - Athetoid/dystonic (10%) –> basal ganglia</li> <ul> <li>Involuntary movements, athetosis, dystonia</li> <li>Extrapyramidal dysfunction</li> <li>Poor candidates for Tendon transfers</li> <li>Associated with Rh issues, less common in modern medicine</li> </ul> <li>Ataxia (5%) –> cerebellum</li> <ul> <li>Cerebellar dysfunction</li> <li>Balance and coordination disturbance</li> <li>Usually part of another syndrome, rare for isolated CP</li> </ul></ul></div>”
<div>RC - 2017 A 12 year old with spastic CP comes in with 45o elbow flexion contracture. Excellent function. Independently ambulates. Which is not a viable procedure selection?</div>
<div>A) Fractional Biceps lengthening</div>
<div>B) Musculocutaneous neurectomy</div>
<div>C) Biceps tendon Z-lengthening</div>
<div>D) Flexor-pronator slide</div>
“B. Only do MCN neurectomy if full ROM<div><img></img><br></br></div><div><br></br></div>”
<div>RC 2013, 2008 - Clinical exam of a boy with CP and intrinsic contracture would reveal which of the following?</div>
<ol> <li>MCPs extended, PIPs flexed</li> <li>MCPs extended, PIPs extended</li> <li>MCPs flexed, PIPs extended</li></ol>
“C. intrinsic plus. intrinsic muscles flex MCP and extend PIP<div><img></img><br></br></div>”
<div>RC 2011 - Pt. With CP upper extremity with thumb in palm deformity. All are true except? </div>
<ol> <li>Web space contracture</li> <li>Spastic adductor</li> <li>Extensor of EDB</li> <li>Stiff MCP joint</li></ol>
“D. MCP is unstable and often requires capsulodesis/fusion.<div><div>Deformity: (1) spastic flexors and adductors, (2)flaccid extensors and abductors, (3) hyper mobile MP joint, and (4) web space skin contracture</div></div><div>Tx: Tx: Release of adductor pollicis, 1st dorsal interossei, FPB and FPL +/- web space deepening.<div><img></img><br></br></div></div>”
<div>RC 2013 - Which osteotomy is contraindicated in an ambulatory child with a dislocated hip secondary to a sacral level Myelo.</div>
<ol> <li>Dega </li> <li>Pemberton</li> <li>Chiari</li> <li>Salter</li></ol>
- Chiari is a salvage procedure.<div>Low level myelo means this is likely just DDH - treat as such!</div><div><br></br></div><div>Note that most hip procedures in myelo are contracture releases!</div>
<div>RC 2011, 2010 Have a L4 myelomeningocele, what is the foot deformity? </div>
<ol> <li>varus deformity</li> <li>calcaneus deformity</li> <li>equinus</li> <li>foot valgus</li></ol>
2.<div><br></br></div><div>cavovarus - sacral level</div><div>calcaneus - L4>L5, tx with Split tib ant transfer or just tib ant tenotomy</div><div>calcaneovalgus - L4 or L5, tx same</div><div>clubfoot - high lumbar, low thoracic; try ponsetti, but likely need surgery</div>
<div>RC 2010 -List the 4 Types of Neural Tube Defects</div>
“<div>myelodysplasia: failure of spinal cord closure</div><ul><li>Spina bifida occula - failure to fuse, elements contained</li><li>Meningocele - thecal sace protrudes without neuro elements</li><li>Myelomenigocele - thecal sac protrudes with neuro elements (ie out of spine)</li><li>Rachischisis - neural elements exposed to air; fatal</li></ul><div><img></img><br></br></div>”
<div>RC 2018 - What is inheritance pattern of DMD and the protein involved</div>
<div>a.XLR with dysptrophin</div>
<div>b.XLR with fukutin</div>
<div>c.autoD with dys</div>
<div>d.autoD with fuk</div>
A.<div><ul> <li>Ortho Manifestations</li> <ul> <li>Calf pseudohypertrophy</li> <li>Scoliosis</li> <li>equinovarus foot deformity</li> <li>joint contractures</li> </ul> <li>Non-ortho manifestations</li> <ul> <li>Cardiomyopathy - 90%</li> <li>Static encephalopathy</li> <li>Malignant Hyperthermia</li> </ul></ul></div>
<div>RC 2008 - Duchenne MD - All Except:</div>
<div><ol> <li>Often present with toe walking</li> <li>Apparent at birth</li> <li>X-linked</li> <li>Proximal muscle weakness</li></ol></div>
- not apparent until walking age<div><br></br></div><div>1- all toe walk</div><div>3- XLR</div><div>4- prox mm weakness</div>
<div>RC 2016, 2008 - All of the following are true regarding the use of steroids in Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy, except?</div>
<ol> <li>Improves muscle strength </li> <li>Prolongs ambulation </li> <li>Does not improve pulmonary function </li> <li>Osteopenia is a concern</li></ol>
- it DOES improve pulm function.<div><br></br></div><div>Benefits</div><div><div>1) Improved muscle power, Decrease in rate of muscle loss</div> <div>2) Prolong respiratory function</div> <div>3) Decrease need for spinal surgery (secondary to avoiding wheelchair)</div> <div>4) Prolonged walking ability</div></div><div><br></br></div><div>Side Effects: Short stature, weight gain, acne, hypertension, infection, bruising</div><div><ol> <li>Cataracts</li> <li>Ulcers</li> <li>Skin: striae, thinning, bruising</li> <li>Short Stature</li> <li>Hypertension</li> <li>Hirsutism</li> <li>Hyperglycemia</li> <li>Infections</li> <li>osteoNecrosis</li> <li>Glycosuria</li> <li>Osteoporosis</li> <li>Obesity</li> <li>Immunosuppresion</li> <li>Diabetes</li></ol></div><div><br></br></div>
RC 2013 List 3 benefits to using steroids (prednisone/deflazacort) in Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy?
<div>1) Improved muscle power </div>
<div>2) Decrease in rate of muscle loss</div>
<div>3) Prolong respiratory function</div>
<div>4) Decrease need for spinal surgery (secondary to avoiding wheelchair)</div>
<div>5) Prolonged walking ability</div>
<div>RC 2012 - List 3 potential complications of using steroids in Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy?</div>
<div>Mnemonic for Corticosteroid Side effects/Complications: CUSSHHHINGOOID</div>
<ol> <li>Cataracts</li> <li>Ulcers</li> <li>Skin: striae, thinning, bruising</li> <li>Short Stature</li> <li>Hypertension</li> <li>Hirsutism</li> <li>Hyperglycemia</li> <li>Infections</li> <li>osteoNecrosis</li> <li>Glycosuria</li> <li>Osteoporosis</li> <li>Obesity</li> <li>Immunosuppresion</li> <li>Diabetes</li></ol>
“<div>RC 2014, 2012 - Duchenne’s kid, 13 years old, scoliosis cobb angle 35 degrees, FEV 55%. Tx?</div> <ol> <li>wheelchair modifications</li> <li>bracing</li> <li>anterior + posterior fusion</li> <li>posterior only fusion</li></ol>”
4.<div>Indications for PSIF:</div><div>-Cobb20-30 deg (these are nasty curves)</div><div>-when pt becomes non-ambulatory</div><div>-FEV<35, or declining FEV</div><div>-poor response to steroids</div><div><br></br></div><div><div>sufficient spinal growth will have occurred in the child with DMD by age 10 or 11 years so that <b>posterior fusion will not result in a marked loss of trunk height or development of crankshaft deformity.</b></div></div>
<div>RC 2015 - All of the following result in loss of sensation except:</div>
<div> a. Polio</div>
<div> b. CMT</div>
<div> c. Alcohol</div>
<div> d. Diabetes</div>
A. Disease caused by viral destruction of anterior horn cells in spinal cord and brain stem motor nuclei (ie motor weakness with normal sensation)<div><br></br></div><div>C - Peripheral neuropathy secondary to avitaminosis<br></br></div><div></div>
<div>RC 2011 - What is true regarding achondroplasia?</div>
<ol> <li>point mutation of FGFR3</li> <li>hypertrophic zone is normal</li> <li>50 % are spontaneous presentations</li> <li>autosomal recessive</li></ol>
A. true.<div><br></br></div><div>B- false. although main defect is in proliferative zone (abnormal chondrocyte prolif), hypertrophic zone is also abnormal.</div><div>C - false. 80% spontaneous.</div><div>D - false. Auto D.<br></br><div><br></br></div><div><br></br></div></div>
<div>RC 2008 - Achondroplasia, all of the following except</div>
<ol> <li>Foramen magnum stenosis</li> <li>X-linked</li> <li>Most common short limbed disproportionate dwarfism</li> <li>FGFR3</li></ol>
- Auto Dom.
<div>RC 2013 - 3 year old child presents ataxic gait and Rhizomelic dwarfism, frontal bossing, midface hypoplasia. Has a history of obstructive sleep apnea. Has gibbus deformity and hyperreflexic on exam. What is the next appropriate step?</div>
<div>A) MRI of C1-C2</div>
<div>B ) MRI of foramen magnum</div>
<div>C) EMG</div>
<div>D) Sleep study</div>
B. FMS/basilar invagination.<div><br></br></div><div>A - dont see C1C2 instability (AAI) in Achondroplasia</div><div>D. sleep study is a SCREENING test - this patient has neuro findings - dont screen!</div>
<div>RC 2011 - List 3 spine findings in Achondroplasia</div>
FMS, basilar invagination<div>TLK</div><div>Lumbar SS</div><div>Lumbar hyperlordosis</div>
<div>RC 2014 - What is not true about achondroplasia and spine?</div>
<ol> <li>Atlantoaxial instability</li> <li>foramen magnum stenosis</li> <li>Lumbar Hyperlordosis</li> <li>Thoracolumbar kyphosis</li></ol>
A. No AAI in Achondroplasia
<div>RC 2015 - 7yo kid with SED. Planning to do epiphysiodesis for genu valgum. What must you get pre-op?</div>
<ol> <li>C-spine flex/ext</li> <li>Scoliosis series</li> <li>MRI brain</li> <li>Polysomnography</li></ol>
A. up to 40% can be myelopathic for C-spine instability - AAI (odontoid hypoplastia, os odontoideum)<ul> <li>Inheritance: congenital: AD (severe), tarda: x-linked recessive (milder & late age 8-10)</li> <li>Morphology: short-trunk dwarf</li> <li>Ortho issues: genu varum/valgum, c-spine instability (odontoid hypoplasia), scoliosis, hip dislocations (coxa vara), valgus hips & knees, retinal detachment, early OA</li></ul><div></div>
<div>RC 2015, 2013 - All of the following are true, except:</div>
<ol> <li>Mucopolysaccharidosis is a proportionate form of dwarfism</li> <li>San Fillipo is the most common form of mucopolysaccharidosis</li> <li>Duchenne’s is associated with calf hypertrophy</li> <li>Marfan’s is associated with arachnodactyly</li></ol>
<div>Answer: 3 - calf pseudohypertrophy</div>
<div><br></br></div>
- true. other proportionate = cleidocranial dysplasia<div>2. maybe true. have read San Fillipo most common, but also Morquio.</div><div>4. true</div>
<div>RC 2017 - Name 5 bone disorders that present in infancy/early childhood with periosteal calcification and thickened cortices?</div>
<div><br></br></div>
<div>Lovell and Winter’s (can’t remember from which chapter)</div>
<ul><li>Diaphyseal dysplasia</li><li>Osteopetrosis</li><li>Hyperphosphatasia</li><li>Junvenile paget’s disease</li><li>Craniodiaphyseal dysplasia</li><li>Ribbing disease</li><li>Caffey disease (infantile cortical hyperostosis)</li><li>Hardcastle syndrome</li></ul>
<div>RC 2011 - Larsen’s syndrome. What is common?</div>
<ol> <li>elbow flexion contracture</li> <li>cervical kyphosis</li> <li>Sprengel’s deformity</li> <li>pectus excavatum</li></ol>
2.<div><div>ligamentous hyperlaxity, abnormal facial features, and multiple joint dislocations</div></div><div>cervical kyphosis (other dz with this is DD)</div><div>40% mortality in 1st year</div><div><br></br></div>
<div>RC 2015 - Regarding arthrogryposis, all are true except?</div>
<div> a. bilateral hip dislocation</div>
<div> b. normal intelligence</div>
<div> c. progression of flexion contracture until skeletal maturity</div>
<div> d. internal rotation contracture of shoulder</div>
C. non-progressive flexion contracture - typically improves slightly.<div><br></br></div><div><br></br></div>
<div>RC 2013 - Child with arthrogrypotic extension contracture. All of the following are possible to restore elbow flexion except: </div>
<ol> <li>Triceps</li> <li>Steindler flexorplasty</li> <li>Pec Major</li> <li>Anterior deltoid</li></ol>
“4.Deltoid NOT used.<div><br></br></div><div>extension contracture = cant FLEX</div><div><br></br></div><div>Non-op: stretching, serial castin</div><div>Triceps lengthening and release of posterior capsule</div><div>Tendon transfers to biceps include: pec, lat dorsi, triceps</div><div>Steindler flexorplasty (proximal tenodesis of flexor pronator mass) -<b> does not decrease flexor strength (MCQ 2008)</b></div><div><img></img><br></br></div>”
<div>RC 2008 - Regarding the Steindler flexorplasty in arthrogryposis, which is not correct:</div>
<ol> <li>Techniques are described for proximal attachment to both bone and soft tissue</li> <li>It is associated with a 20% loss of flexion power (they didn’t say wrist or elbow)</li> <li>It results in elbow flexion strength being stronger in supination than pronation</li></ol>
- You will slightly INCREASE Elbow Flexion, as the Flexor-Pronator mass is advanced proximal.<div><br></br></div><div> <ol> <li>You lose active elbow extension 30 degrees, final flexion stays same but more power, lose active pro/supination</li> <li>ADL’s – way better! è whoa. Let’s not get carried away here.</li> <li>Flexor/pronator mass advancement, so stretched out even more when in supination = stronger</li></ol><div><br></br></div><div><br></br></div></div>
<div>RC 2015 - List the 6 orthopaedic findings for diagnosis of Marfan’s</div>
<div>The Ghent Nosology for diagnosis: “skeletal criteria”</div>
<ul> <li>General: ligamentous laxity, Arm-span to body height ratio > 1.05</li> <li>U/E: Arachnodactyly, Reduced elbow extension (<170 degrees)</li> <li>Chest: Pectus carinatum OR excavatum</li> <li>Spine: Scoliosis (With dural ectasia), Spondylolisthesis</li> <li>Hips: Protrusio acetabuli</li> <li>Feet: Pes planus (secondary to medial malleolus displacement)</li></ul>
<div>RC 2013, 2010 - List 3 extraskeletal features of Marfan’s syndrome</div>
<div>Cardiac</div>
<ul> <li>Aortic dissection</li> <li>Mitral valve prolapse</li> <li>Aortic root dilatation</li> </ul>
<div>Resp</div>
<div><ul><li>Spontaneous pneumothoraces</li><li>Apical blebs</li></ul></div>
<div>Occular</div>
<ul> <li>Superior lens dislocation (slit lamp exam)</li> </ul>
<div>Neurological</div>
<ul> <li>Dural ectasia</li> <li>Meningocele</li> </ul>
<div>Other</div>
<ul> <li>Berry aneurysm in brain</li></ul>
<div>RC 2016 - All of the following are associated with Marfan’s syndrome, except:</div>
<ol> <li>Type III Collagen</li> <li>Scoliosis</li> <li>Aortic dilatation</li> <li>Protrusio acetubuli</li></ol>
A.<div><ul> <li>marfans: AD, Inactivation of Fibrilin </li> <ul> <li>FBN1 in > 90% of cases</li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>type 3 and 5 collagen is assx with EDS</li></ul></ul></div>
<div>RC 2012 - Conditions with Ocular Manifestations: all of the following except</div>
<ol> <li>Homocysteinuria</li> <li>Marfans</li> <li>Neurofibromatosis</li> <li>Achondroplasia</li></ol>
D.<div><ul> <li>Homocysteinuria has inferior lens dislocation (homo’s go down to blow their friends)</li> <li>Marfan’s has superior lens dislocation (marfans grows up… they are tall)</li> <li>Neurofibromatosis has Lisch nodules in the iris.</li></ul></div>
<div>RC 2013 - Which of the following are found in a patient with hypophosphatasia?</div>
<ol> <li>Low ALP, Normal Ca, Normal PTH</li> <li>Low ALP, High Ca Normal PTH</li> <li>High ALP, Low Ca, Normal PTH</li> <li>High ALP, Normal Calcium, High Cocaine</li></ol>
“Answer B. hypophosphatasia = LOW ALP (only dz to have this)<div><ul><ul><li>Auto Recessive.</li><li>ALP deficiency due to error/mutation in the isoenzyme of ALP</li> <ul> <li>no ALP to synthesize PO4 (important for bone formation)</li><li>zone of provitional calcification never forms</li></ul> </ul><li><img></img><br></br></li><li>only 2 have hyperCa</li><li>only 1 has low ALP</li></ul><div><br></br></div></div>”
<div>RC Exam 2016 What is true regarding the inheritance of x-linked hypophosphatemic rickets? </div>
<ol> <li>If the father has the disease, 50% of his children will get it</li> <li>If the mother has the disease, 100% of sons will get it</li> <li>If the father has the disease, 100% of daughters will get it</li></ol>
“<div>Answer: C</div><div>X-linked dominant.</div><div><ul> <li>Cause: excess urinary phosphate losses</li> <ul> <li>Impaired renal tubular absorption of phosphate (renal phosphate wasting) –> hypophosphatemic</li> <li>Low PO4, high ALP, Normal Ca2+</li> </ul><li>Tx: Phosphate, calcitriol</li></ul></div><div><br></br></div> <div><img></img></div><div><br></br></div><div><img></img><br></br></div>”
<div>RC Exam 2013 Osteomalacia causes which of the following</div>
<ol> <li>Increased mineralization after fracture</li> <li>Pseudofractures</li> <li>Biopsy shows increased mineralized osteoid matrix.</li> <li>Sasquatches have weak bone</li></ol>
2.<div><ul> <li>Osteomalacia is basically rickets in adults. (ie open physis –> rickets; closed –> osteomalacia)</li> <li>A metabolic bone diseasewheredefective mineralizationresults in alarge amount or unmineralized osteoid </li> <ul> <li>qualitativedefect as opposed to a quantitative defect like osteoporosis</li> </ul> <li>VitD Def –> low PO4 and Ca –> decreased bone mineralization. </li> <ul> <li>Same lab profile as Rickets</li> </ul> <li>People with osteomalacia are able to make osteoid but not mineralize it.</li> <li>Results in bone pain, low trauma fractures and proximal muscle weakness. Patients also get Looser’s Zones, which are pseudofractures.</li> <li>Tx: Vit D</li></ul></div>
<div>RC 2017 - 12 year old presents with olecranon fracture while playing. Previous contra-lateral olecranon fracture year previously. Normal height, bad dentition. Previous fractures of both distal radius and left tibia. What should you do?</div>
<div>A) Start bisphosphonates</div>
<div>B) Skeletal survey for child abuse</div>
<div>C) Refer for renal work up</div>
<div>D) ...</div>
A.<div><br></br></div><div><div>Bisphosphonate Benefits: decrease bone pain, enhance well-being, improve muscle strength and mobility, improve vertebral shape, and decrease fracture rates</div></div>
<div>RC 2013 - Osteogenesis Imperfecta, what is the least true: </div>
<ol> <li>Disease symptoms get better as a patient ages.</li> <li>Healed fractures have abnormal strength</li> <li>Heal bones slower</li> <li>Over 70% develop scoliosis</li></ol>
“C<div><br></br><div><div>-Fractures heal in normal time (with or without bisphosphonates), but do not remodel –> abnormal strength –> progressive bowing</div></div><div>-Symptoms improve with age, bone strengthens</div><div>-Scoliosis (70%): 60% have severe chest wall deformities –> pulm compromise is main cause of death in adults with OI</div><div>-other spine:</div><div><ul> <li>Spondylolisthesis 11% (vs 4% in normal pop’n)</li> <li>Spondylolysis 8% (vs 3%)</li> <li>Basilar Invagination (myelopathy)</li> <ul> <li>Decompression and posterior fusion</li> </ul> <li>Cervical Spine</li> <ul> <li>Can have basilar invagination and upper cervical kyphosis</li> <ul> <li>Some need shunts for obstructive hydrocephalus</li> </ul> <li>Need surgical stabilization (ant and post) but poor track record</li> </ul></ul></div></div>”
RC 2011 - 6 yr old boy with distal radius # after minor trauma seen in clinic. Pt has had 4 #s with minor trauma in the last 12 months. Also has bowing of legs. What is the defect?<ol> <li>defect in collagen 1</li> <li>defect in collagen 2</li> <li>defect in phosphate</li> <li>child abuse</li></ol>
1.<div><br></br></div><div><div>a) defect in collagen 1 (OI, Ehler Dahnlos has one with type 1, some marfan pts (although main is fibrillin)</div> <div>b) defect in collagen 2- Kniest (COL 2A1) and SED</div> <div>c) defect in phosphate – hypophosphatemic ricket</div></div>
<div>RC 2013 - What is not a side effect of bisphosphonate treatment in kids (2013)</div>
<ol> <li>Acute fever with administration</li> <li>Growth delay</li> <li>Prolonged effects on bone remodelling</li> <li>Immediate and transient hypocalcemia</li></ol>
Answer: B<div><br></br></div><div>bisphosphonates</div><div><br></br></div><div><br></br><div>1- true 85%</div><div>2- no growth delay</div><div>3- true. Decrease in bone remodelling and healing post-osteotomy</div><div>4- true<br></br><div><br></br></div><div><div>Side effects of Bisphosphonates</div> <div>1. Acute phase reaction: fevers, malaise, diarrhea, bone and muscle pain. Occur 1-3 days after administration.</div> <div>2. Transient Electrolyte abnormalities: hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, hypomagnesemia. These are mild and assymptomatic and resolve within a couple of days. Prevention can be done with Ca and Vit D supplementation</div> <div>3. Uveitis</div> <div>4. Thrombocytopenia</div> <div>5. Oral ulceration</div> <div>6. AVN of the jaw - only reported in adults, not in children.</div> <div>7. Exacerbation of reactive airway disease (like asthma)</div> <div>8. Cross the placenta so may affect the fetus (not reported)</div> <div>9. Has NOT been shown to delay healing of fractures in kids, but may delay healing of osteotomies </div> <div>10. Suppressed bone turnover markers for up to 2 years after treatment.</div></div></div></div>
<div>RC 2009 - Proteus syndrome. What is associated?</div>
<ol> <li>Megalospondylodysplasia</li> <li>Café au lait</li> <li>Lisch Nodules</li> <li>Precocious puberty</li></ol>
A
<div>RC 2018, 2015</div>
<div>What is true with regards to sickle cell anemia? </div>
<ol> <li>RBC’s can sickle at normal oxygen tension</li> <li>Presentation of bone infarct is similar to osteomyelitis</li> <li>Heterozygous individuals are symptomatic</li> <li>No increased risk of infection</li></ol>
B<div><ul> <li>Bone scan and radionuclide scan can differentiate bone infarct from OM</li> <ul> <li>OM = normal marrow uptake but abN bone scan</li> <li>Infarct = decreased marrow uptake with abN bone scan</li> </ul></ul></div>
RC 2014, 12, 10 List 3 radiographic features of C2-3 pseudosubluxation
“<ul> <li>Spinolaminar line on posterior arches within 1.5mm of C2</li> <li>Reduction of subluxation with extension (<4mm subluxation is normal)</li> <li>No anterior soft-tissue swelling</li></ul> <ul> <li>References: AAOS Core Review, JAAOS 2011 - Pediatric Cervical Spine Trauma</li> </ul> <div><img></img></div><div><br></br></div><div>C2-C3 more common than C3-4</div>”
<div>RC 2016 - Which is true of pseudosubluxation of cervical spine in pediatric patient? </div>
<ol> <li>Vertical facets </li> <li>Posterior vertebral step </li> <li>C3-4 subluxation is most common </li> <li>Intact posterior spinous line</li></ol>
“D.<div><br></br></div><div>1-horizontal facets in peds</div><div>3. C2-C3 more common</div><div><br></br></div><div>Spinolaminar line on posterior arches - anterior cortex of posterior arch of C2 should be within 1mm of this line<br></br></div><div><img></img><br></br></div>”
<div>RC 2015 - List 4 ways in which radiographs of the cervical spine in children differ from those of skeletally mature patients?</div>
<ul> <li>AAOS Core Review 2/OKU Peds 3</li> <ul> <li>Increased ADI (>5mm abnormal)</li> <li>Pseudosubluxation of C2-C3</li> <li>Absence of cervical lordosis</li> <li>Widened retropharyngeal space (>6mm C2, >22mm at C6) - typically from crying</li> <li>Wedging of cervical vertebral bodies</li> <li>Neurocentral synchondroses (closure by age 6)</li> </ul> <li>JAAOS Pediatric Cervical Spine Trauma:</li> <ul> <li>Relatively Horizontal Facets</li> <li>Underdeveloped uncinate processes ( <li>Increased ligamentous elasticity</li> <li>Cartilaginous junction b/w VB and end plates</li></li></ul></ul>
<ul><li>paraspinal musculature weak</li><li>increase risk of SCIWORA</li><li>large head - spine board requires cut out</li><li>spinal column more elastic than cord</li></ul>
<div>RC 2012, 2010 Regarding SCIWORA, what is true? </div>
<ol> <li>50% can be a delayed presentation</li> <li>most common in the T spine</li> <li>infantile cord can stretch 2 inches before rupture</li> <li>most commonly seen in 8-15yo</li></ol>
Answer: 1. up to 20-50% can be delayed<div><br></br></div><div>2. more common in C-spine</div><div>3 - It is believed that the spinal column can stretch up to 2 inches, whereas the spinal cord may rupture when stretched <1 cm.</div><div>4. most peds spine injuries between 15-19</div><div><br></br></div>