socialism: core ideas and principles Flashcards
socialism core principles
- collectivism
- common humanity
- equality
- social class
- workers’ control
fraternity
- socialists believe fraternity exists in a society where wealth is equally shared by everyone
- for socialists, a shared feeling of brotherhood between people will cause co-operation and peace in a society
- socialists do not believe that there is fraternity in a capitalist system as people compete with each other to succeed
- socialists believe fraternity will end capitalism
cooperation
- working together for the same end (for example the common good) Socialists believe in a society where humans co-operate with each other
- socialists argue that there is no co-operation in a capitalist society because there is a conflict between the different social classes which exist in a capitalist society
- socialism believes a socialist economic system will promote co-operation.
- for socialists, the society’s economic system influences human behaviour.
capitalism
- capitalism is an economic and political system where the resources and property in a society are owned privately by businesses
- capitalists believe that goods and services should be produced to make a profit.
- under capitalism, the price of goods and services is determined by the market forces of demand and supply
- capitalism does not believe that the government should own and have control over any business or industry in society
- socialism is opposed to capitalism
- fundamentalist socialism rejects capitalism and wants it to be abolished and replaced by socialism.
- Marxists are an example of fundamentalist socialists because they believe socialism can be achieved by a revolution against capitalism.
- revisionist socialists believe in reforming capitalism by the government providing welfare and redistributing wealth in society - social democracy is a form of revisionist socialism
common ownership
- common ownership is when all property and resources in society are publicly owned and run by the government so that all people in society can benefit
- common ownership is often called nationalisation
- socialists believe common ownership will reduce inequality because resources can be allocated by the government to meet the needs of many people in society
- fundamentalist socialists are in favour of common ownership
arguments against common ownership
- common ownership could mean an increase in taxation to fund publicly owned services.
- common ownership could also increase the national debt because of increases in public spending. This means that future generations will have to pay off the debt
- free market: A case against common ownership is the argument that the free market will make sure the economy is run more efficiently than it would under government control, only the free market is able to resolve the basic economic problem (meeting the infinite want of humans with a limited number of resources)
- common ownership could lead to an inefficient allocation of the economy’s scarce resources
- Friedrich Hayek (1944 ‘Road to Serfdom’) supported the free market and was opposed to the government controlling the economy
communism
- communism believes that wealth in society should be commonly owned by all individuals
- a communist economic system has a planned economy and public ownership of industries
- in a planned economy, the state owns and controls all means of production such as land, capital and labour
- Karl Marx’s ideas are important within communism
- Karl Marx believed capitalism would be brought to an end by the exploited working class revolting and overthrowing the owners of capital in society
- for Marx, the revolution by the working class would cause capitalism to end
- for Karl Marx, communism exists when there are no social classes of people in society, and all individuals cooperate and live peacefully
socialism does require revolutionary change (supported by most fundamentalists)
- Marx – revolution is inevitable; the pre socialist state reflects the interests of the dominant economic class and would not allow the promotion of socialist values
- Lenin – revolution is necessary to stifle the ‘false consciousness’ of the masses
- Luxemburg – revolution would inevitably and spontaneously develop
- Trotsky - ‘permanent revolution’ was needed until capitalism disappeared
- Mao – economic revolution needs to be followed by long term cultural revolution
- neo Marxists, e.g., Ralph Miliband argued that attempts at parliamentary socialism had failed and therefore revolution was necessary
socialism does not require revolutionary change (revisionists)
- Bernstein – with universal adult suffrage, the existing state could allow socialist governments and steady socialist change
- Crosland and Giddens – with the welfare state, the existing political system could ensure steady increases in public spending and progress towards a fairer system
- Giddens – the existing system can be reformed (via devolution, for example) to produce greater political equality
socialism must involve the abolition of private property and capitalism (fundamentalists)
- private property generates inequality, individualism and competition, which all go against socialism’s core values of equality, fraternity and cooperation
- the ownership of private property leads to exploitation
- the collapse of capitalism is inevitable
- the working class have a ‘false consciousness’ that their situation is ok, which makes a socialist revolution difficult
- public ownership is more rational than private ownership (Webb)
- trying to achieve socialism alongside Keynesian economics has failed (Tony Benn)
socialism does not have to involve the abolition of private property and capitalism (revisionists)
- the debate around private/public ownership focuses on the means to achieve socialism and not the ends – the true ends being equality and fraternity - working class conditions did improve under capitalism (Bernstein)
- increased public spending rather than public ownership is the key to a more socialist society (Crosland)
- a neo liberal economy can provide the state with a growing tax yield to finance extra public spending required by socialism (Giddens)
- in a globalised world, with the spread of home ownership, socialists must accept that the owning of private property is inevitable
marxism is redundant
- communism was intended to ‘mark the end of history’, but history has in fact recently just marked the end of communism
- the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989-1990 signalled the failed attempt to bring Marxist principles to effective fruition
- more recent attempts to implement Marxism have not been successful and even catastrophic (USSR – China) - leading to repression, torture, and genocide
- capitalism has not imploded as Marx forecast, instead, its reach has become ever wider
- in advanced capitalist states, the working class has not risen to revolution, as Marx predicted. They have instead taken on characteristics of the bourgeoises (e.g., private property), while enjoying the benefits of market economies
marxism is not redundant
- capitalism remains unstable and volatile (e.g., financial crises)
- capitalism still creates poverty and gross inequality, particularly in developing nations
- globalisation has weakened the power of national governments, reinforcing Marx’s argument that economic power supersedes political power
- the ‘disappointing’ record of socialist governments in capitalist states, e.g., Francois Hollande’s government in France after 2012 shows that radical change may be impossible without a revolution
- regimes such as the USSR and China were never truly Marxist – just because they misapplied Marx’s theories, does not mean these theories were invalid
key disagreements - human nature
means: how the capabilities of the community can be realised
- Marxists/revolutionary socialists – true cooperative and communal instincts can be liberated only by the removal of the exploitative and oppressive capitalist system and the creation of a communist society
- Webb – capitalism does not need to be completely abolished but can be gradually changed to suit the needs of the community
types of equality
- equality of outcome – supported by fundamentalists, but not revisionists
- absolute equality – supported by fundamentalists but not revisionists
- equality of opportunity – supported by revisionists but not fundamentalists
- equality of welfare – supported by revisionists but not fundamentalists
positive or negative view of human nature
- Marx – positive view, humans are social beings and work well together in society
- Webb – workers are limited, selfish and uniformed and therefore a representative democracy is necessary
- Lenin – a small party is required to guide the workers in revolution (Luxemburg disagrees with this)
key disagreements - state
means: how a capitalist state should be managed
- Marx – revolution; Luxemburg – opposed evolutionary socialism as she does not believe change away from capitalism can be gradual; capitalism is bound to collapse
- Crosland – work within the capitalist state
- Giddens – minimal state intervention (more similar to Marx, to an extent)
end: whether a capitalist state needs to abolished completely
- Marx and Luxemburg – complete removal of capitalism, removal of the state control completely
- Webb – gradual change to a socialist party
- Crosland and Giddens – work within confines of capitalism
key disagreements - society
means: how to deal with class inequalities
- Marxists – advocate replacing capitalism with a centrally planned economy based on common ownership of the means of production
- Crosland – high levels of government spending to redistribute wealth and provided welfare, this will help to address the unbalance between the rich and poor
- Giddens – equality of opportunity but less state intervention, people should be encouraged to work hard to achieve
key disagreements - economy
means: extent of state intervention
- Marx – initial state intervention to control means of production but eventually no state, abolition of capitalism and the state structure workers’ control
- Webb – increased state intervention; Crosland – high levels of state intervention
- Giddens – rejection of extensive state intervention as it creates a dependency culture
means: how the economy should be controlled and run
- Marx – collectivism, centrally planned and controlled economy, where the workers eventually own all means of production
- Crosland – Keynesian style economics, mixed economy with free market, private ownership and some nationalisation of key industries
- Giddens – acceptance of capitalist free market economy
key agreements - human nature
- positive view of human nature
- regard people as social creatures who are cooperative, sociable, and rational
- people naturally prefer to work together than compete against each other
- equality
- Marx and Engels – view humans as ‘social beings’
- Giddens – importance of community
key agreements - the state
- problems with capitalism
- growth of the state
- Luxemburg – a capitalist state promotes exploitation
- Crosland – capitalism needs to be managed
- Giddens – it is important to offset the inequalities in society created in a capitalist society
- Marx – a socialist revolution would require the state to take control of all means of production initially, owned by the workers
- Webb – the state needs to expanded to help deliver socialism
- Crosland – high levels of government spending needed (growth of the state) to iron out inequalities
key agreements - society
- class inequalities
- Marx – society is dominated by class conflict
- Luxemburg – class consciousness must be developed to lead to an overthrow of the system
- the other thinkers agree that there are inequalities between classes
key agreements - economy
- some form of state intervention
- Marx – state to control means of production initially
- Crosland – high government spending on welfare
- Giddens – government intervention to reduce inequalities
state intervention - collectivism
- socialists believe that a far greater number of people are disadvantaged by a free market economy than benefit from it
- so, socialists support collectivism and state intervention through increased state spending and providing more state services
- in the economy, free market capitalist systems have seen an unequal distribution of wealth (the way wealth is shared among a population is unequal)
- income inequality in the UK is high: the highest earning 10% earn 24 times more than the lowest earning 10%
criticisms of collectivism
- collectivism focuses on the importance of group action and commonly shared interests, and so prevents diversity and individuality amongst humans
- social democracy and revisionism are forms of socialism that accept private property which collectivism is opposed to
- neorevisionist socialism supports privatisation of industry, reforms to welfare and8 believes in weakening trade union power, which suggests collectivism is less important for socialists
endorse collectivism: human nature
- socialists support collectivism because it relates to socialism’s view of humans as social animals that prefer living in groups rather than on their own
- human nature is argued by socialists to be shaped by social conditions and so people can only be truly understood with regards to the social groups they are part of
- socialists favour collectivism because they believe membership of a collective group such as a community or society provides humans with freedom and fulfilment