1. democracy and participation Flashcards
power
the ability to make people do things that they may not want to otherwise
government
- a set of institutions through which general rules of society are made and enforced
- the aim of a government is to resolve conflict in public interest therefore the people give it power
legitimate government
the majority of people accept that the government has the authority to hold power and make rules if they win the election
the electorate and constitution limits the power of government through
- checks and balances (separation of the powers)
- elections offer retrospective accountability
direct democracy
where the laws and policies are determined by the public themselves
advantages of direct democracy
- most genuine form of democracy
- encourages participation
- educates the public on issues that affect them
- people must take responsibility for their choices
- prevents power from being concentrated in the hands of the elite
- everyone has a chance to voice their opinion
- more of the population is happy with the result
- up to date (reflects changing views)
- fosters competition (gives an incentive to be better)
disadvantages of direct democracy
- large populations make it hard to manage and can cause chaos
- public may not have the time, interest or ability to vote
- wealthy people can distort the debate - the possibility of manipulation of ordinary people
- public may not be willing to vote for unpopular but necessary reforms
- the majority can vote to oppress minority groups (tyranny of majority)
- not everyone has the political education, information and/or understanding to make an informed vote
- peer pressure
- inconvenient and time consuming
- popular protest and pressure groups are no longer needed
representative democracy
when people vote to choose politicians who will represent their views
advantages of representative democracy
- more practical because of time restrictions and population size
- elected representatives may have more experience and expertise
- representatives can implement unpopular but necessary policies
- representatives can be held accountable at elections
disadvantages of representative democracy
- popular participation is limited
- representatives may not reflect the public’s views
- parties can have greater influence over representatives’ actions
- low public interest and participation, leading to decisions being left at the hands of a small elite
- our electoral system makes it more difficult for smaller parties to win
direct democracy is unlimited, direct and unmediated
in representative democracy, popular participation in government is limited, indirect and mediated
the different ways someone can be a representative
- casual: sharing the same belief system/cause
- ideologically: the party (eg labour)
- constituency
- demographically: eg race, gender
how are representatives elected in the uk
- an election is called
- election campaigns (releasing the public manifestos)
- on polling day, people vote for their MP based on their constituency
- votes are counted in each constituency, who ever has the most votes wins
- the party with the majority of seats forms a government
the three models of how MPs could represent us
- trustee
- doctrine of the mandate
- descriptive representation
trustee
- are chosen for their experience, knowledge and/or education
- (this is usually used as an excuse for rebelling against the party whips)
advantages of trustees
avoids the tyranny of the majority
disadvantages of trustees
- may make a decision that the constituents disagree with
- their views could be outdated
- could go rouge
- undemocratic as not everyone has voted for them
doctrine of the mandate
- in winning an election, a party gains a popular mandate (which is an instruction/command that gives authority to a person to act in a particular party)
- this is based on a programme outlined in a party’s manifesto (a pamphlet that outlines the programme that a party intends to implement once in office)
- this theory argues that it is the party, rather that the individual politician that represents the people
advantages of the doctrine of the mandate
- consistency of party ideology
more representative of what the electorate want - the public are aware of a party’s policy before they are elected - a more informed vote
disadvantages of the doctrine of the mandate
MPs are bullied into voting in line with the party
descriptive representation
- elected representatives in democracies should represent not only the expressed preferences of their constituency or the nation as a whole, but also those their descriptive characteristics that are politically relevant
- such as geographical area of birth, occupation, ethnicity, age and gender
participation crisis
to the point at which participation and engagement levels are so low that the legitimacy of the government needs to be called into question
democratic deficit
when democracy is not operating effectively for due to a lack of accountability amongst politicians and not all citizens can claim equal influence over decision making
formal participation
voting in general elections (usually measured by turnout numbers) and party membership
statistics on party membership
- in 1953, the Conservative party had 2,800,000 members whereas in 2022, they had 172,000 members
- in 1970, the labour art had 600,000 members whereas in 2022, they had 432,000 members
- this could because of the rise of smaller or nationalist parties
- the SNP had 104,000 members (2022)
- the green party had 54,000 members (2022)
timeline of extending the franchise
- 1215 - the magna carter was the first limit on power of the king and recognition of barons and ordinary people’s rights (eg the right to the free trial)
- 16th century - king henry VIII forced to work with parliament to take over the church. power is still limited but king’s willingness to work alongside the government. parliament is still unelected
- 1689 - the bill of rights was first developed to protect ordinary citizens and force the king to work with parliament on law making.
- 17th century - civil war between the king and parliament (1642-1648). parliament asserted authority over the monarchy and he was executed
- 1832 - the great reform act allowed middle class men to vote
1884 - the reform act extended to allow some working class men to vote - 1918 - as a result of women’s suffrage movement and WW1, the representation of the people act was passed to allow votes to all men over 21 and women over the 30 who earned property on their own name
- 1928 - the 1928 representation of the people act allowed suffrage to men and women over 21
- 1969 - the final representation of the people act passed to lower the voting age to 18
proposals for the reform of uk democracy
- more devolution
- power of recall
- house of lords reform
- digital democracy
- e-petitions
- reform of the electoral system
more devolution
- more voting may prevent people from voting
- devolution increases the want for independence
- turnout for devolved assemblies are lower than westminister
- however, turnout is increasing
- Wales - 45.3% (2016)
- Northern Ireland - 54.9% (2016)
- Scotland - 63.5% (2021, Scottish parliament elections)
power of recall
if an MP has done something wrong
- would make MPs more like delegates (limiting the Burkean principle of freedom of conscience)
- MPs would need to be sentenced by i prison or suspended for 21 days in the house of commons
- broadening the criteria would give the constituents more power
- e.g. conservative MP, Peter Bone, lost his seat after being removed by constituents in a recall petition, after being suspended from the commons after breaching the MP code of conduct