Social Psychology Flashcards

1
Q

Social comparison theory

A

People evaluate their own abilities and opinions by comparing themselves to others.
Upward comparison: comparing yourself to someone perceived as better/more successful, motivates self improvement but could cause feelings of inadequacy
Downward comparison: comparing yourself to someone perceived as worse/less successful, boosts self esteem and comfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Enlightenment effect

A

Understanding of psychology principles improves your self awareness and decision making, leading to more thoughtful/intentional behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Halo effect

A

Perception of one positive trait influences your overall impression, causing other traits to be viewed more favorably

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Self-fulfilling prophecy

A

Belief held about a person that causes the belief to come true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Attitude

A

Reflect how we think/act/feel towards something, characterized by positive/negative feelings, beliefs and behavioral tendencies toward it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Components of attitudes

A

Affective: refers to emotional aspect of attitude, how we feel about things, whether we like them or not
Behavioral: how our attitudes influence our actions and behaviors, what we do as a result of our attitude
Cognitive: beliefs or thoughts about an entity, involves information or perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Dimensions of attitudes

A

Measure how attitudes vary in strength or nature
Strength: how firmly held an attitude
Accessibility: how easily an attitude comes to mind when one is faced with an object
Ambivalence: presence of mixed/conflicting feelings about an object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cognitive dissonance

A

Discomfort/tensions we feel when we hold two contradictory beliefs/attitudes, or engage in behavior that conflicts with existing beliefs/attitudes. Motivates us to change our attitude, behavior, or create new cognition (to justify contradiction) to reduce inconsistency to reduce discomfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Self-perception theory

A

People infer their own attitudes/beliefs through observing their own behavior, especially when they don’t have strong pre existing attitudes. Therefore our own behavior leads us to adopt new attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Impression management theory

A

People change attitudes and behaviors to create a desired impression to be consistent with social expectations or gain approval. Attitude changes as a result of a need to manage impressions of others. Causes people to present beliefs/attitudes aligning with social norms/expectations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Elaboration likelihood model

A

Explains how people process persuasive messages and how likely they are to change as a result
Central route: involves careful, thoughtful processing of persuasive messages, and is likely to be lasting if the person is motivated and thinks deeply about the issue
Peripheral route: involves attitude change based on attractiveness or emotional appeal over careful consideration. This change is more temporary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Foot in the door vs door in the face technique

A

Foot in the door: small request is made first to gain compliance, followed by greater request. People are more likely to agree to the second because they already agreed to the first
Door in the face: large request that is likely to be rejected, followed by smaller more reasonable request. People are more likely to agree to the second one because it seems relatively more reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Attribution

A

How people try to explain causes of behaviors events or outcomes
Stable: factor is fixed and does not change
Unstable: factor is not fixed and can change over time
Internal: causality assigned to personal traits, feelings, abilities
External: causality assigned to situational factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do individualist vs collectivist cultures affect attribution

A

Individualist: emphasize personal responsibility and internal attribution
Collectivist: emphasize situational elements and external attribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Attribution errors

A

Fundamental attribution error: while judging others, we tend to overemphasize personal (internal) characteristics and ignore situational (external) factors
Defensive attribution error: explaining things in a way that defends us from feelings of vulnerability or mortality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Stereotypes

A

Generalized beliefs or expectations about members of a group, simplify complex social information, lead to oversimplified or incorrect assumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Subtyping

A

Occurs when ppl see individuals who do not fit a stereotype, and believe they are exceptions to the rule, creating a subtype to maintain the original stereotype

18
Q

Perceptual confirmation

A

Tendency to see what we expect to see, and interpret ambiguous behavior in a way that confirms our pre existing stereotypes or beliefs

19
Q

Illusory correlation

A

Perception of a relationship between two variables when it does not exist

20
Q

Adaptive conservatism

A

Tendency to favor familiar/“safe” groups. Has roots in evolutionary psychology (was once necessary to group together with people for survival), leads to prejudice/mistrust against unfamiliar groups

21
Q

Out-group homogeneity

A

Perception that members of an out group are more similar to each other than members of one’s in group, leads to stereotyping/belief that all members of a group are “all the same”

22
Q

Contact hypothesis

A

Proses that under certain conditions (equal status, cooperation and support from authorities/institutions), direct contact between members of different groups reduces prejudice

23
Q

Common knowledge effect

A

People are more likely to talk about info that group members know, because shared info is safe. Familiar info is an indicator of in group status, unfamiliar info is an indicator of our group status

24
Q

Social loafing

A

We don’t work as hard in group projects as solo, because we perceive that people will do our work for us

25
Q

Group polarization

A

The opinion of the collective group when they get together is more extreme than the opinions of one individual, because people don’t want to offer opposing opinions

26
Q

Groupthink

A

You are more likely to agree with group than say no for fear of rejection

27
Q

Deindividuation

A

People abandon their individual identity for the sake of the group identity, engaging in activities they may not normally

28
Q

Group influence

A

Conformity: going along with group behavior or opinion without being directly requested
Compliance: going along with group behavior with direct request
Obedience: type of compliance where direct request comes from authority figure

29
Q

Informational vs normative influence

A

Informational: going along with a group because you genuinely believe the group is right, behavior will persist after group leaves
Normative influence: going along with the group to avoid rejection, not because you think they are right, behavior will change after group leaves

30
Q

Correlates of conformity

A

Unanimity, group size = correlated w/ conformity
Anonymity, presence of co-conspirator = inversely correlated w/ conformity

31
Q

Milgram study

A

Obedience study where people are instructed to administer a deadly shock to someone by an authority figure

32
Q

Correlates of obedience

A

Physical closeness of authority figure, legitimate authority, depersonalized victim
Temporal closeness of request and action, depersonalized victim, defiant models = inversely correlated with obedience

33
Q

Sternberg’s triangular theory of love

A

Intimacy: sharing deep emotions, thoughts and feelings
Passion: hot, physical attraction (lust)
Commitment: desire/intent to stay in the relationship

34
Q

Matching hypothesis

A

People will be in relationships with people of equal levels of attraction

35
Q

Correlates of attraction

A

Facial symmetry, proximity to each other, similar level of attractiveness = correlated with attraction

36
Q

Types of aggression

A

Relational: trying to harm other’s relationships
Physical: trying to cause physical harm
Hostile/hot: out of emotion
Instrumental: aggression used to reach a goal
Identity/societal role can affect aggression

37
Q

Kin selection

A

More likely to help people related to us

38
Q

Reciprocal altruism

A

“You help me, I’ll help you”

39
Q

Empathy-altruism hypothesis

A

To help someone without any physical benefit for yourself, you must have empathy for them. Some disagree, say that all empathy is for an emotional benefit

40
Q

Bystander effect

A

More likely to help someone when there are fewer people around (ties into conformity/group size)

41
Q

Social responsibility norm

A

Humans have a responsibility to help those more vulnerable