Social Judgement Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define social perception

A

process by which people come to understand one another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

elements of social perception

  • 3 broad
  • first impressions
A

person, situation, behaviour.

first impressions subtly influenced by different aspects of a person’s appearance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

baby faces
- seen as?
why?

A

large, round eyes, round cheeks, smooth skin, rounded chind.
- seen as warm, kind naive, weak, honest, submissive.
mature faces = wrinkles, small eyes - stronger, dominant, more competent
- why? genetic programming to act gently to infantile features.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Scripts?

  • how experience effects script?
  • why scripts influence social perceptions
A
  • scripts = preset notions about certain types of situations
  • more experience = more detailed script. better able to sequence list of actions.
  • scripts influence social perceptions because we see what we expect to see, use situations to explain causes of human behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

behaviour - derive meaning from observations. fine detail vs gross units?

A
  • discrete units = fine detail. pay more attention and remember more about event.
  • gross details - remember overview
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

nonverbal behaviour

  • how many “universal” expressions
  • fucntion of nonverbal communication?
  • mirror neurons?
  • other nonverbal cues
A

behavioural cues used to ID person’s inner states.

  • 6 universal expressions. happiness most accurate. better at judging in-groups than out-groups.
  • elicit empathy. mimic facial expressions.
  • MN - fire when do action & fire when watch others do action.
  • thin slices of expressive behaviour; eye contact, physical touch, cultural differences.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

distinguishing truth from deception

A

face - easy to control

body - harder to control - body tells the truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

why do we have difficulty detecting lies

A
  1. mismatch btw behavioural cues that signal deception and the ones used to detect deception
  2. people tend to assume that the way to spot a liar is to watch for signs of stress in behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

4 channels of communication provide relevant information

A

words -not trusted
face - controllable
body - mroe revealing than face
voice - most revealing cue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

attribution theories
- 2 categories of attribution
covariation model

A
  • personal attributions, situational attributions.

- form attribution by noting pattern btw presence of possible causal factors and whether or not the behaviour occurs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

correspondent inference theory
- attribution of behaviour to personaltiy
inferences based on 3 factors

A
  • infer from action whether act corresponds to personal characteristic of the actor
  • degree of choice; expectedness of behaviour; intended effects or consequences of someone’s behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

kelley’s covariation model

3 covariation’s

A

attribute behaviour to factors that are present when a behaviour occurs and absent when it does not.

  • consensus: are others acting to same stimulus?
  • distinctiveness: react the same or different to same stimuli?
  • consistency: behaviour consistent over time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

cognitive heuristics

- problem??

A

information-processing rule of thumb. mental shortcuts.
think - quick & easy.
- problem? frequently lead to error.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

availability heuristic

- problems?

A
  • tendency to estimate the likelihood that event will occur by how easily it comes to mind.
  • false-consensus effect: overestimate extent to which others share opinionsm, attributes, behaviours
  • base rate fallacy: insensitive to numerical data. more receptive to vivid images. (see school shooting, not mundane death)
  • counterfactual thinking: imagine alternative outcomes. better result = disappointed, worse result = satisfaction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

fundamental attribution error

A

explain other’s behaviour by overestimate personal, overlook situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

overconfidence barrier

A

too much confidence in judgements

17
Q

perceptual salience

A

info that is focus of people’s attention, ppl overestimate causal role of perceptually salient info.

18
Q

actor/observer difference

A

see other behaviour as dispositional, explain out behaviour as situational.

19
Q

two step model at attribution process

  • evidence
A
  1. automatic first step - fail to factor in external.
  2. effortful second step. - take into account all info; personal and situational to make more accurate judgements.
    - quick impressions based on brief sample of behaviour; commit FAE when cognitively busy; perceptual bias
20
Q

culture and attribution

  • kids vs adults?
  • background vs foreground
  • bicultural social perceivers
A
  • kids = equal in personal and situational
  • adults; western = more personal; eastern = more situational.
  • west = foreground, east = foreground&background equally.
  • when primed with images on either culture - attribute consistent w that culture
21
Q

defensive attributions

A

explanations about behaviour that defend us from feelings of vulnerability and mortality. - belief in just world.

22
Q

motivational biases

  • self esteem
  • ideological perspective
  • belief in just world
A
  • need for self esteem biases social perceptions. Told one trait is favoured, more likely to associate self with that.
  • conservative perspective vs liberal.
  • individuals deserve what they get. blame others, keep ourselves separate from situation. blame ppl to protect it from happening to us.
23
Q

priming

- evidence: words, visual info, auditory, or physical feeling

A

tendency for recently used words to come to mind easily and influence the interaction of new info.

24
Q

implicit personality theory

A

network of assumptions that we make about the relationships among traits and behaviours

25
Q

central traits

A

traits that exert powerful influence on overall impressions

26
Q

primacy effect

2 explanations

A
  • tendency for info presented early in seuqnecy have more impact on impressions of info presented later.
    1. Need for closure - quick to make first impression, pay less attention to subsequent info.
    2. change of meaning hypothesis - interprety inconsistent info in light of that first impression. trait is malleable.
27
Q

confirmation biases

3 aspects

A

tendency to interpret, seek and create information in ways that verify existing beliefs.

  1. perseverance of beliefs
  2. confirmatory hypothesis testing
  3. self-fulfilling prophecy
28
Q

perseverance of beliefs

A

confirmation bias.

  • stick to belief even after discredited.
  • self-perpetuating idea.
  • delete by discussing alternative theory
29
Q

confirmatory hypothesis testing

A

confirmation bias
- seek info that supports existing views.
doesnt occur when uncertain about beliefs; concerned about accuracy.

30
Q

self-fulfilling prophecy

A

tied w confirmation bias
- perceivers expectations about person lead person to behave in confirmation w expectations.
teacher expectations.
automatic thinking
break: stop treating ppl in accordance with belief of them. stop behaving in response in way that confirms.