Social Influence Flashcards

(168 cards)

1
Q

Cryptomnesia

A

The process by which minority behaviours become the majority view.

Population does not remember how/why the shift happened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Conversion

A

ISI

The majority internlise a new behaviour or belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the factors for Minority influence to be successful?

A

Consistency
Commitment
Flexibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Moscovici (Minority Influence) - Method

A

Groups of 6, 2 of which were confederates - consistently called the slides green
Ppts judged colour of (blue) slides

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why does research into minority influence lack external validity?

A

artificial scenarios which do not reflect real-life situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Asch - method
Conformity %

A

3 lines to compare to line X
1 true ppt

75% of ppts conformed at least once
higher conformity on more difficult tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Asch - factors that influence comformity

A

Group size
Presence of another dissenter
Task difficulty
Ppt variables
Gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did the addition of another dissenter effect conformity rates? - Asch

A

Conformity dropped to 31.8% with 3 confederates, but any more made little difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened if the confederate was inconsistent? - Asch

A

25% conformity
Naive ppt act more independently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

strengths and weaknesses of Asch as a lab study

A

Controlled
Minimise extraneous variables
Replicable

Artificiality = low ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types of Conformity

A
  1. Compliance
  2. Identification
  3. Internalisation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types of Social Influence

A

Informational SI
Normative SI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Research support - NSI

A

Adolescents exposed to messages that peers their age weren’t smoking were less likely to smoke

Hotel guests told that 75% of guests reused towels, 25% decrease in towel usage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reasons for non-conformity

A

Independence

Anti-Conformity

Social Support

External locus of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Locus of control

A

Rotter
0 = internal, things happen as a result of our own actions

13 = things happen as a result of forces beyound our control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

LOC evaluation - Holland - Shocks

A

37% of internals refused to go to max shock

23% of externals refused to go to the maximum shock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

LOC - Twenge - meta analysis

A

Meta analysis
Young Americans increasingly likly to believe that their lives are controlled by forces beyonf their control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is an external LOC correlated with?

A

Poor school achievement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

LOC Study- Schurz -ultrasound

A

Ultrasound stimulation to a learner
56 ppts
20 steps, highest caused skin damage
80% went to the end

Not predictive of LOC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Authoritarian Personality

A

Struct coherence to conventional values
Belief in absolute obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Adorno - F-scale

How do those with an authoritarian personality view the world?

A

measure the different components of the authoritarian personality

Those with an authoritarian personality saw the world as black and white

Strict adherence to social hierarchies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Elms + Milgram method

A

20 obedient, 20 defiant ppts, 2 months after shock experiment
MMPI + F-scale
asked about upbringing and their attitudes towards experimenter + learner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Elms + MIlgram findings

A

MMPI showed little difference between obedient and defiant ppts

Obedient ppts had higher levels of authoritarianism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Why are dispositional explanations of obedience not a full explanation?

A

Prejudice and submissiveness could be caused by a poor stabdard of education as a child

Lacks internal validity - ignores situational factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
How was Adorno's sample bias? - F-scale
2000 white, middle-class Americans Lacks population + temporal validity Not generalisable
26
Milgram - background
Social psychology professor at Yale inspired by trial of nazi, Adolf Eichmann, who claimed he was simply 'following orders'
27
Milgram - Method
40 male volunteers 15-450 volts ppts encouraged to keep going when the wished to withdraw
28
Milgram - what % went to 450V?
65% continued to 450 volts, where the learner became unresponsive
29
What percentage went to max shock with learner in the same room
40%
30
Agentic State
A stae where a person acts as though they are an 'agent' of another person
31
Autonomous state
People have control and act according to their own wishes
32
Agentic state vs cruelty - Zimbardo
Ppts may have used the situation to express their sadistic tendencies Guards acting harshly despite no authority figure Obedience may be caused by certain aspects of human nature
33
RS - Legitimacy of authority
Showed students a film of Milgram Experimenter blamed due to legitimacy of authority
34
Real-World application of agentic state + legitimacy of authority
Improving leadership + communication skills Encourage critical thinking + independent decision making
35
Criticisms of agentic state
ignore individual differences Oversimplify complex social and psychological phenomena
36
Weaknesses of Zimbardos study
ignores individual differences Guards behaviour inconsistent Stereotypical Lack of realism Ethical Issues Lack of rtw
37
Zimbardo Conclusions
Social roles have a strong influence on behaviours Power may corrupt those who yield it Institutions brutalise people and lead to deinstitutionalisation Prsons exert psychological damage
38
What percentage went to max shock when in an office building
48%
39
What percentage went to max shock when hands were touching
30%
40
What percentage went to max shock when orders given over phone
20.5%
41
How did Yuille and Cutshall obtain their results
interview degree of stress - 7-point scale Asked about how the event affected them emotionally those with highest stress levels had most accurate results
42
What % went to max shock when the experimenter was replaced by another ppt in ordinary clothes?
20%
43
What %b went to max shock when in a run down building?
48%
44
What % went to max shock in Milgrams original study?
65%
45
What % went to max shock when someone else administered the shock?
92.5%
46
What did Asch do?
Conducted several experiments in the 1950s to determine how people are affected by the thoughts and behaviours of others
47
The Asch Effect
The influence of the group majority on an individuals judgement
48
2 Types of social influence
Normative Social Influence Informational Social Influence
49
3 Types of conformity
Internalisation Identification Compliance
50
What did Zimbardo do?
Conducted a famous experiment which he claimed to demonstrate the power of conformity in social roles
51
Compliance
Going along with a request or demand in public whilst disagreeing with the group's viewpoint or behaviour in private The change in people's expressed views is temporary
52
Internalisation
When an individual changes their behaviour to fit in with a group publicly whilst also agreeing with them privately The strongest from of conformity
53
Identification
When someone conforms to the demands of a social roles in society
54
Asch - line judgement task method
Lines a,b,c & X One true naive ppt
55
Asch - line judgement task results
75% conformed at least once
56
Asch - 4 key factors which influence conformity
Size of the majority Presence of another dissenter Public or private nature of response Task difficulty
57
Asch - what happened to conformity rates with the presence of another dissenter?
Dropped to near Zero
58
Asch - limitations
Lacks ecological validity Deception - ethical issue
59
Asch - Strengths
Lab setting meant variables were strictly controlled - replicable - minimize influence of extraneous variables
60
How did confidence influence Asch Study?
Ppts who felt confident in their decisions did not succumb to group pressure as easily
61
Perrin + Spencer - Asch experiment on engineering sudents
Conformity rates were not as high as in Asch's study, which may be down to the engineers being confident in their decision making
62
What did Eagly believe caused men and women to show different levels of conformity?
Social roles Women are more likely to conform because they don't like conflict Men are less likely to conform because they are expected to show independence and assertiveness
63
Normative Social Influence
People conform to the group norm to fit in, feel good and be accepted by the group
64
Informational Social Influence
People conform because they believe the group is competent and has the correct information, particularly when the task or situation is situational
65
Social Role - definition
A pattern of behaviour that is expected of a person in a given setting or group
66
Social norm - definition
A group's expectation of what is appropriate and acceptable behaviour for its members - how they are supposed to behave and think
67
Script - definition
A persons knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting
68
How did Zimbardo collect his sample?
Advertisement in a California newspaper 70+ male volunteers - all underwent psychological testing and background checks Narrowed down to 24 healthy male college students Payed $15 / day
69
Zimbardo - Where was the mock prison set up?
Basement of a psychology building at Stanford
70
How long was Zimbardos experiment supposed to run?
2 weeks
71
Zimbardo - what happened on day 2?
Some of the prisoners revolted, and the guards quelled the rebellion by threatening the prisoners with night sticks
72
Zimbardo - How did the guards start treating the prisoners?
The guards harass the prisoners in an increasingly sadistic manner, through a complete lack of privacy and basic comforts
73
Zimbardo - what happened to the prisoners?
Began to show signs of severe anxiety and hopelessness - began toerating the guards abuse?
74
Zimbardos role in the mock prison
Superintendent
75
Zimbardo - when did the exp end? Why?
6 days due to the ppts deteriorating behaviour
76
Zimbardo - role of social norms
Guards to be authoritarian Prisoners to be submissive When prisoners rebelled, they violated these social norms, leading to upheaval
77
BBC Prison Study - Aim
Observe how dynamics between the group evolved over time
78
BBC Prison Study - how many volunteers?
5 guards 10 inmates
79
BBC Prison Study - what was measured daily?
Compliance, Stress & Depression Levels
80
BBC Prison Study - what was set up to stop the study if necessary?
Ethics Committee
81
BBC Prison Study - Results
The guards did not form a group, did not always use their authority and did not identify with their assigned role The unequal system eventually failed as the guards had a weak group identity and the prisoners formed a strong group identity
82
BBC Prison Study - days 1-3
All prisoners acted in a way that they thought would allow them to become guards
83
BBC Prison Study - day 4
The prisoners group formed a stronger idedntity as they knew they couldn't get promoted
84
BBC Prison Study - day 6
Prisoners rebelled - ppts formed a democracy which eventually failed because of group tensions Some ex-prisoners tried to establish a hierarchy
85
BBC Prison Study - how did it end?
The ethics committee stopped the experiment early due to the ppts stress levels
86
BBC Prison Study - Conclusion
The volunteers didn't embody or stick to their assigned role This implies flexibility of roles
87
BBC Prison Study - strengths
No deception Protection - ethics committee
88
BBC Prison Study - limitations
Lacks ecological validity Staged for TV Lack of empowerment
89
Obedience
The change of an individuals behaviour to comply with a demand by an authority figure
90
Why do people comply?
Concern of consequence if they do not comply
91
Inspiration of Milgrams experiment
Trial of Adolf Eichmann, Nazi war criminal Claimed he was 'following orders'
92
Milgrams - Method
40 male volunteers, told they were participating in a study to improve learning and memory Shown a device they were told would deliver electric shocks of different intensities Volts increased in 15V increments
93
Milgram - What % went to the max shock?
65%
94
Milgram - % max shock in office building
48%
95
Milgram - % max shock with learner in same room
40%
96
Milgram - % max shock when hands were touching
30%
97
Milgram - % max shock when orders given over phone
23%
98
Milgram - strengths
Strict control of variables
99
Milgram - limitations
Low ecological validity Deception Lack of protection
100
Agentic state
An individual acts as though they are an agent of another person
101
Autonomous state
People act according to their own wishes
102
How was agentic state shown in Milgrams study?
Ppts admitted to feeling under 'moral strain'
103
Agentic shift
An individual shifts from autonomous to agentic state
104
What 3 Factors did Milgram suggest may have caused the ppts to stay in the agentic state?
Insistence of authority Pressure of location Unwillingness to disrupt
105
3 main situational factors of obedience
Proximity Location Power of uniforms
106
What did the researchers wear in Milgrams study?
Lab coat
107
Who proposed the idea of an authoritarian personality?
Adorno
108
What does the F stand for in the F scale?
Fascist
109
F-Scale evaluation
Easily manipulated - ppts may be able to 2nd guess Correlates with education - provides an alternative explanation
110
Independence
A lack of consisten movement either towards or away from social expectancy
111
Anti-conformity
A consisten movement away from social conformity
112
Asch - conformity levels with the presence of a dissenter from the start of the study
5.5%
113
Asch - conformity rate when a dissenter joined later in the study
8.5%
114
Cultural differences in LoC
Japanese people conform more easily than Americans also have higher levels of authoritarianism
115
What type of LoC is more likely to resist obedience?
Internal
116
What factor makes an internal LoC more likely to resist obedience?
Suspecting manipulation
117
Conversion
The process where the majority gradually adopt a new minority viewpoint or behaviour. The new belief becomes accepted both privately and publicly
118
How does Conversion happen?
Informational Social Influence
119
3 Main factors in Minority Influence
Consistency Commitment Flexibility
120
When is commitment seen as stronger?
If the minority has to resist social pressure and abuse because of their viewpoint
121
Systematic Processing
The minority viewpoint is carefully considered over time
122
What is needed for permanent change?
identification
123
Moscovici - Judge colour of slide - Results
Ppts conformed 8.42% of the time 32% agreed at least once Confederates inconsistent - 1.25% conformity
124
3 Things guards were given in Zimbardos study
Batons Mirror sunglasses Uniform
125
Hoffling - Hospital study providing external validity to Milgrams study
Researcher phoned nurses and instructed to administer 20mg of Astroten, an unfamiliar drug 21/22 obeyed
126
What evidence was there to suggest that the ppts in Milgrams study believed the shocks to be genuine?
2 had panic attacks 70% stated in the debrief that they believed it to be genuine ppts showed signs of anxiety and distress - trembling, biting lip
127
Puppy study - supporting internal validity of Milgrams study
15V shocks - students told volts increased Puppy squealed Most students went up to 450V
128
3 Traits of authoritarian personality
Rigid beliefs in conventional values Intolerance of ambiguity Submissive towards authority figures
129
Abu Ghraib study - Zimbardo evaluation
Guards abusive towards prisoners even though the guards were held accountable for their behaviour
130
Uniforms of Prisoners in the Stanford Prison experiment
loose smock to wear and a cap to cover their hair
131
How were the prisoners identifies in Zimbardos study?
by a number
132
The effect of uniforms in Zimbardos study
Lead to de-individualisation, meaning they were more likely to confirm to social roles
133
Milgrams - % max shock when in a run-down office
47.5%
134
Milgrams - % max shock when learner in same room
40%
135
Milgrams - % max shock when hands touching
30%
136
Milgrams - % max shock when orders iven over phone
20.5%
137
Milgrams - % max shock when in ordinary clothes
20%
138
What did Adorno believe about absolute obedience?
Absolute obedience is a psychological disorder with its roots embedded in personality
139
'other' groups
Minorities
140
What is believed to cause an authoritarian personality?
Harsh parenting in childhood, where the parents gave conditional love. Children acquire hostility and resentment towards this parents and displace it onto socially inferior - This is known as scapegoating
141
Authoritarian personality definition
a type of personality that Adorno believed to be especially susceptible to obey authority Such individuals are thought to be dismissive of those of a lower status and submissive towards those of a higher status
142
Adorno Sample
2000 white, middle-class Americans
143
Adorno - Aim
Investigate unconscious attitudes towards other ethnic groups
144
2 examples of items on the F scale
'Obedience and respect for authority are the most important virtues for children to learn' 'There is hardly anything lower than a person who does not feel great love, gratitude and respect for their parents'
145
Cognitive style of an authoritarian personality
No fuzziness between categories of people, with fixed fixed and distinctive stereotypes about other groups
146
Authoritarianism cannot explain a whole countries behaviour
Millions of individuals in WW2 Germany displayed obedient and antisemitic behaviour, but they can't all have the same personality More likely explanation that the Germans identified with the Nazi state, meaning AP cannot explain the atrocities of WW2
147
Education vs Obedience + Authoritarianism
less-educated people are consistently more authoritarian and obedient than well-educated people.
148
2 Explanations of resistance to Social influence
Social Support Internal LoC
149
Asch - social support
a dissenter doesn't have to give the correct answer, but simply break the unanimity to free the individual to follow their own conscience
150
Milgram - social support
10% conformity when joined by a disobedient confederate
151
Social Support definition
the presence of people who resist social pressures to conform or obey and help others to do the same. These people act as models for resistance to SI
152
Evidence for social support as an explanation for resistance to SI - smoking
Pregnant adolescents with a buddy who advocated against smoking were less likely to smoke than their peers without a buddy
153
The Rosenstrasse Illustration
Protest in Nazi Germany in 1943 where German women protested against the arrest of their Jewish husband. Despite threats that they would be fired up on, the women collectively refused orders to disperse and their husbands were eventually set free
154
Snowball effect
Over time, more and more people become converted, and there is a switch from the minority to the majority
155
What does minority influence lead to?
Internalization or conversion, in which private attitiudes are changed as well as public behaviours
156
Moscovici - investigatin the effect of minority influence - procedure
group of 6 people, 2 of which were confederates, asked to view a set of 36 blue coloured slides. the confederates consistently said green
157
Moscovici - what % conformed to the minority?
8.42%
158
Moscovici - % conformity with an inconsistent minority
1.25%
159
Moscovici - % wrong answer with no confederated
0.25%
160
Stimulated Jury - support for flexibility of minority influence
A group discussed compensation to be payed to someone involved in an accident Inflexible confederate had no effect, as well as a Confederate who was flexible too early. only those who ccompromised later were successful
161
2 types of consistency
Synchronic Consistency Diachronic consistency
162
Synchronic Consistency
Minority all saying the same thing
163
Diachronic Consistency
All saying the same thing for some time
164
5 steps of social change through minority influence
1. Drawing attention to issue 2. Cognitive conflict 3. Consistency 4. Augmentation principle 5. Snowball effect
165
Social change through majority influence Social norms intervention
Young adults frequently misinterpret the frequency at which a behaviour occurs among their peers. Social norms interventions communicate to a target population the actual norm concering such behaviour, in the hope that recipients will change their behaviour to bring it in line with the norm
166
How does minority influence explain social change?
Nemeth states that minority influence causes people to engage in divergent thinking which leads to better decisions and creative solutions to social problems
167
Why does minority influence only happen gradually?
there is a tendency for humans to follow the majority influence, meaning people are more likely to maintain the status quo than engage in social change
168
Support for Normative SI - messages on door
Nolen et Al - hung message on door that most residents are trying to reduce energy usage Saw a significant decrease in energy usage compared to the control who saw message with no reference to other people behaviour