Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Psychology > Attachment > Flashcards

Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
AP® Psychology flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards Psychology 101 flashcards
1
Q

What were Schaffers stages of attachment

A
  1. Asocial
  2. Indiscrimate
  3. Specific
  4. Multiple
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What happens in the Asocial stage of attachment?

A

behaviour is the same towards humans and objects with a slight preference towards humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What happens in the Indiscriminate attachment stage?

A

Babies prefer humans to objects and show no stranger anxiety so can be comforted by anyone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happens in the specific attachment stage?

A

Attachment is formed to primary caregiver, infant shows stranger and seperation anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happens in the multiple attachment stage?

A

29% of children developed a secondary attachment within one month of primary attachment, usually towards father

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the issues with Schaffers stage of attachment?

A

Limited, simple characteristics

Problems studying asocial stage

Conflicting evidence on multiple attachment

Measuring multiple attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the strengths of Schaffers stages of attachment?

A

HIgh external validity

Longitudinal design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the method used for Schaffers stages of attachment?

A

60 babies
skilled working class families in Glasgow
Visited every month for the first year and again at 18 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were Schaffers findings?

A

25-32 weeks - 50% of babies showed separation anxiety towards primary caregiver

40 weeks - 80% specific attachment, 30% - multiple attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Lorenze theorise?

A

all organisms have a biological predisposition to form an attachment to one single object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Lorenz do?

A

Hatched Goslings either with mother or in an incubator
They proceeded to follow the first moving object they saw within 13-16 hours of hatching

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Harlow emphasise?

A

The importance of contact comfort as newborn monkeys kept alone in a cage would usually die but would survive if given something like a cloth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the procedure Harlow followed?
Findings?

A

16 baby monkeys with 2 wire model mother, one of which was covered in cloth, milk dispensed by both

Preference for cloth-covered model and seeked for comfort when frightened
Critocal period - 90 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the issues with Lorenz study?

A

lack of generalisability to humans

Counter evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the strengths of Harlows study on rhesus monkeys?

A

Theoretical value
- the importance of early relationships

Practical Value
- social workers understand risk factors in child neglect
- breeding programmes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Learning Therory of attachment?

A

Cupboard - Love - caregiver as a provider of fod and baby learns to love whoever feeds them?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the primary and secondary drives of cupboard-love theory?

A

Primary - need to satisfy hunder

Secondary - attachment to caregiver who feeds them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is Bowlby’s monotropic theory?

A

infants require a qualitatively unique relationship to develop an internal working model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the internal working model?

A

Mental representation of our relationship with our primary caregiver which acts as a template for all other relationships - continuity hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the critical period?

A

A primary attachment must be made between 6 months - 2.5 years, otherwise an attachment will never be made and the child will suffer behavioural and emotional problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the cross cultural support for Bowlbys monotropic theory?

A

Ganda tribe - one primary attachment, even when reared by multiple caregivers

Israeli Communal Farms - children raised by nurses (metaplets), spent 3 hours a day with parents. primary attachment was still towards biological mum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How how is the importance of a primary attachment over-emphasised?

A

uniqueness vs strength?

Thomas - a network of attachments may be more beneficial

Van Iijzendoon - a stable network of adults provides better care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What supporting research is there for the internal working model?

A

the continuity hypotheses suggests that internal working models should be passed through generations

Bailey
- 99 mothers with 1 year olds
- standard interview mother-grandmother
- observation mother-infant
results showed attachment type was generational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

4 criteria for Ainsworths SS

A

separation anxiety
stranger anxiety
reunion behaviour
willingness to explore room

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Ainsworth SS method

A

lab experiment
set routine
time sampling
100 middle class american women & their infants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Ainsworth SS findings

A

70% secure
15% insecure-avoidant
15% insecure-resistant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

How is the SS replicable?

A

high inter-observer reliability
highly operationalised
4 specific criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is the supporting research to show reliability of classification for Ainsworths SS?

A

Waters
50 infants 12, 18 months
Greatest consistency in reunion behaviour
48/50 in same category at 18 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

what are the issues of Ainsworths SS?

A

Low population validity

Categories not always applicable

Low internal validity
- objectivity
- quality of attachment rather than child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Secure attachment

A

comfortable with social interaction and intimacy
healthy cognitive and emotional development
mother consistently sensitive and responds to babies needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Insecure-resistant

A

both seek and reject emotional intimacy
parents are inconsistent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is Bowlbys theory of maternal deprivation?

A

if a primary attachment is not formed within the critical period, one will never be formed and the child will be at risk for behavioural and emotional disorders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Separation anxiety behaviours

A

Protest
Despair
Detachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Affectionless Psychopathy

A

an individual with no sense of shame or guilt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

44 thieves method

A

88 children referred to a guidance clinic
44 were thieves - 16 of which deemed affectionless psychopaths
other 44 - control group

Children and families interviewd to create a record of early childhood experiences

Quasi experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

44 thieves findings

A

86% of affectionless psychopaths Experienced prolonged separation

17% of the other thieves had experienced such separation

4% of control group experienced frequent early separation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What are the issues with the interviews used in 44 thieves?

A

Self-report - social desirability bias
Retrospective data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

How was there researcher bias in the 44 thieves study?

A

Bowlby worked in the childrens home and knew who was in each group

Conducted psychiatric experiments himself, created the affectionless psychopathy diagnosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

44 thieves - privation vs deprivation

A

children moved around a lot and may have been suffering privation rather than deprivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Real-life application of Bowlbys theory of maternal deprivation

A

Hospital practices

Childcare practices

Political agenda - encourages working mothers guilt post WW2

41
Q

Background to Romanian Orphanages studies

A

1989 - plight of children in Romanian orphanages discovered

Former president required women to have 5 children which many families simply couldn’t afford

42
Q

How many orphans were there in Rutters adoption study

A

165 Romanian orphans

43
Q

Rutter finding (Romanian Orphanage)
- adopted before 6 months

A

58 adopted before 6 months
- normal development
- IQ - 102

44
Q

What are the strengths of Romanian orphanage studies?

A

Policy changes to benefit children

Lack of confounding variables

Study cause and effect

45
Q

Weaknesses of Romanian orphange studies

A

Children not randomly allocated

Effects could be due to poor conditions and not institutionalisation

Lack of data on adult development

46
Q

How does attachment type link to bullying?

A

Secure - good relationships

Avoidant - victims

Resistant - bullies

47
Q

McCarthy - influence of early attachments on later life

A

40 dult women assessed as adults to establish their attachment type

Secure - best romantic and platonic relationships

Resistant - problems maintaining relationships

Avoidant - issues with intimacy in romantic relationships

48
Q

Zimmerman -Findings - opposing evidence for the continuity hypotheses

A

Little relationship from infant to adult attachment type

49
Q

Rutter findings - 6-12 months

A

59 adopted between 6-12 months
- disinhibited attachment
- IQ - 86

50
Q

Rutter findings - 2-4 years

A

48 adopted between 2-4 years
- disinhibited attachment
- IQ - 77

51
Q

Who adopted the Romanian orphans?

What age were they assessed?

A

British families adopted the orphans
assessed development at age 4,6,11&15

52
Q

How is attachment often typified?

A

An infants desire to seek proximity to a particular individual and to display distress when seperated from this particular individual

53
Q

Types of caregiver-infant Interaction

A

Interactional synchrony

Reciprocity

Mimicking

54
Q

Interactional synchrony

A

The infant moves their bodies in time with the rhythm of the carer’s spoken language, creating a form of turn-taking

55
Q

Reciprocity

A

Interactions lead to mutual behaviour between carer and infant, with both being able to produce responses from each other

56
Q

Mimicking

A

Infants imitate the facial expressions of the caregiver, suggesting an innate biological drive to form an attachment bond

57
Q

Further Communication between infant and caregiver

A

Bodily Contact

Caregiverese

58
Q

Bodily Contact

A

Physical interactions help to form the attachment bond in the very early period, particularly immediately after birth

59
Q

Caregiverese

A

A form of modified vocal language used by adults as they interact with infants, which includes high-pitched, song-like vocals and are slow and repetitive

60
Q

Klaus + Kennel - impact of contact

A

Compared mothers who displayed extended physical contact vs mothers who only contacted when feeding in the 3 days following birth

1 month later - cuddle, more eye contact

Effects still evident a year later

61
Q

Isabella - What attachment type demonstrated interactional synchrony in the first year of life?

A

infants with secure attachments demonstrated interactional synchrony during the first year of life

62
Q

Meltzoff and Moore - mimic

A

2-3 weeks displayed a tendency to mimic adults facial expressions and hand movements, indicating that mimicry is an innate ability that helps in the formation of attachment

63
Q

Papousek - caregiverese

A

The use of caregiverese was cross-cultural, suggesting that it is an innate device

64
Q

When does interactional synchrony start?

A

Initial consolidation of biological rhythms during pregnancy to the emergence of symbolic and often rhythmic exchanges between parent and child

65
Q

Asocial Stage

A

0-6 weeks
Attention-seeking behaviour, not directed an anyone in particular

66
Q

Indiscriminate attachment

A

6 weeks - 7 months
Similar to asocial - child seeks attention from anyone
Preferences to familiar faces

67
Q

Specific attachment

A

7-11 months
Primarily attached to main caregiver
Separation anxiety

68
Q

Multiple Attachments

A

Attachment formed to other people once the primary attachment has been formed

69
Q

When does the asocial stage occur?

A

First few weeks

70
Q

When does indiscriminate attachment happen?

A

2-7 months

71
Q

When does specific attachment happen?

A

From 7 months

72
Q

When do multiple Attachments form?

A

29% of children developed a secondary attachment within 1 month of primary attachment in Schaffers study

73
Q

Imprinting

A

any kind of phase-sensitive learning that is rapid and apparently independent of the consequences of behaviour

74
Q

What studies weaken learning theory?

A

Lorenz - Goslings imprint before food
Harlow - preference for cloth mother, regardless of food
Schaffer - sensitive response

75
Q

Continuity hypothesis

A

Securely attached babies will grow up to have secure relationships and vice versa

76
Q

Ainsworths findings about monotropy as a universal concept

A

Observed the Ganda tribe of Uganda where babies seemed to form one primary attachment, even when reared by multiple caregiver

77
Q

Fox reaserch into monotropy as a universal concept - Israeli communal farms

A

Children spent the majority of their day with nurses known as metaplets and spent 3 days with their biological parents, however children still formed a primary attachment bond to their biological mother

78
Q

Bailey - support for the continuity hypothesis of the internal working model

A

Assessed 99 mothers with their 1 year old babies on the quality of their attachment and their own mothers using a standard interview procedure. then assessed the mother-infant attachment by observation

79
Q

Interactional Synchrony

A

Mirroring what the other person is doing in terms of body and facial movements

80
Q

Reciprocity

A

Responding to the other with a similar action

81
Q

Indiscriminate attachment

A

Similar responses to all objects, with a preference towards social stimuli

82
Q

Discriminate attachment

A

A specific attachment is formed. high stranger and seperation anxiety

83
Q

5 Components of Bowlby’s monotropic theory

A

Adaptive
Social Releasers
Critical Period
Monotropy
Internal Workin model

84
Q

% of affectionless thieves experienced separation before age 2

A

86% - 12/14

85
Q

2nd most common attachment in Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonberg

A

Insecure avoidant

86
Q

Behaviour elicited by an insecure resistant child on reunion

A

Both reject and seek comfort

87
Q

Romanian Orphan Studies demonstrate

A

Long term consequences are not as severe as Bowlby outlined in his critical period

88
Q

Key study into Caregiver Infant interactions

A

Meltzoff + Moore

89
Q

McCarthy - ‘Love Quiz’ procedure - influence of early attachment

A

Studied 40 adult women who were assessed as infants to establish their attachment type

90
Q

Hazam + Share - ‘love quiz’ findings

A

56% securely attached

25% insecure-avoidant

19% insecure-resistant

91
Q

Characteristics of a secure attachment found by Hazam + Share in the love quiz

A

Good relationships, both romantic and platonic

92
Q

characteristics of an avoidant attachment type according to Hazam + share ‘Love quiz’

A

Struggle with intimacy

93
Q

characteristics of a resistant attachment type according to Hazam + Share ‘Love quiz’

A

Struggle to maintain future relationships

94
Q

Weakness of caregiver-infant interactions

A

Many studies observing CG-I interactions show a similar pattern of behaviour. however, it is difficult to determine whether these actions are delioberate and have any special meaning

95
Q

Strengths of caregiver-infant Interaction observations

A

Controlled observation captures fine detail

Application value

96
Q

Crotwell - application value of caregiver-infant interaction

A

10 minute interactional synchrony therapy with mothers on low-income and their infants, found a significant increase in interactional synchrony and attachment

97
Q

Meltzoff and Moore procedure

A

observed the beginnings of interactional synchrony in infants as young as 2 weeks old.

an adult displayed 1 of 3 facial expressions or gestures

Response was filmed and identified by independent observers

98
Q

What did Isabella find about interactional synchrony?

A

High levels of synchrony were associated with better quality attachments

Psychology (11 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions