Social Influence Flashcards
What is conformity?
the process of yeilding to the majority influence
How did myers define conformity?
‘a change in behaviour or belief as a result of real or imagined group presence’
What is compliance?
publicly conforming to behaviours or views of others but privately maintaining one’s own view
results in superficial change
the behaviolur will change when the group is no longer around
What is internalisation?
a real change of private views to match those of the group
change is permenant because attitudes have been internalised - change occurs when the group is no longer around
What is identification?
adopting the views of behaviour of a group both privately and privately because you value membership of of that group
the change is temporary and not maintained when leaving the group
What is normative social influence?
the need to be accepted by other people - the want to be liked and respected so you agree with people to get approval
it is likely to lead to compliance
What is informational social influence?
the need to feel confident that our ideas and beliefs are correct - tend to seek other’s opinions that we think are right
may lead to internalisation
What study supports informational social influence?
lucas et al = asked students to give math answers that were easy/ more difficult - there was more conformity on the more difficult ones
What study supports Normative social influence?
Asch = interviewed ps and found that they conformed because they felt self-conscious giving the correct answer and they were afraid of disapproval
What is an issue with normative social influence and informational social influence?
induvidual differences are ignored - Asch found that students are less likely to conform than other people
also people who are less concerned about being liked are less likely to conform
What was Asch’s aim?
to investigate whether induviduals would yeild to majority influence and show how easily is is to influence someone
What was Asch’s experiment?
1 p with 6-8 confeds in group
123 ps in total - all white american undergarduates
believed they were taking part in a vision test
shown a display of 3 lines and had to compare these lines to a new line of which was similar
each person gave an answer - the p was always last or last but 1 = creates majority pressure
How did Asch increase validitity with the ps answers?
the displays were arranged so that there can be no possible doubt as to the correct answer
What were the critical trials?
12/18 confeds gave the same wrong answer - ps were observed for conformity
What was Asch’s findings?
error rate in control = 0.7%
error rate in critical trials = 32%
What % of ps in Asch’s experiment conformed at least once?
74%
What % of ps in Asch’s experiment never conformed?
26%
What reasons did ps give for conformity in Asch’s experiment?
i thought my eyes decieved me
i didnt want to spoil the experiment
i did not want to be ridiculed by the rest of the group and feel like an outsider
What was Asch’s conclusion?
in unambiguous situations, there is still pressure to conform to the majority - most people experienced NSI and some experienced ISI
What are the 3 variables affecting conformity?
group size
unanimity
task difficulty
How does group size affect conformity?
creates majoirty pressure
the no. of confeds needed to produce conformity seemed to be 3
2 confed conformity = 14%
3 confed conformity = 32%
after 3 there was little increase in conformity
How does unanimity affect conformity?
if 1 confed gave a different answer whether it was right or wrong, conformity dropped to 5%
How does task difficulty affect conformity?
when the task was made more difficult by making the lines more similar in length, conformity increased due to ISI
What are the issues with Asch’s experiment?
lack ecological validity
lacks population validity - ethnocentric, culture biased
andocentric - focuses on men
poor temporal validity - war just happened people are more likely to conform
unethical - not full informed consent due to deception, uncomfortable situation
study of anti-conformity = high % didnt conform was ignored
What are social roles?
‘parts’ people play as members of various social groups. They are accompanied by expectations we and others have of what is appropriate behaviour in these roles
What was Zimbardo’s aim?
to investigate how readily people conform to the expectations they have about social roles
How did Zimbardo sample his participants?
selected 21 men students who were well adjusted = did a psychological test to prevent ethical issues
volunteer sample = used an advert in a newspaper
paid 15$ and day for 2 week simulation
randomly allocated to roles of guards and prisoners - avoids bias as same may be more naturally demanding
Where did zimbardo’s study take place?
stanford university in a mock prison in the psychology department basement
What uniforms did the guards have?
khaki uniforms
dark glasses and wooden battons
What uniforms did the prisoner’s have?
blindfolded, stripped, sprayed with disinfectant
given smocks to wear and given a prison no.
dehumanised and loss of identity = more likely to conform to role
What happened during zimbardo’s experiment?
guards treated the prisoners harshly that the study stopped after 6 days
prisoners started to rebell after 2 days
some prisoners became depressed and anxious
prisoners didnt believe they were allowed to leave = they thought it was real
What did zimbardo conclude from his experiment?
people will readily conform to the social roles they are expected to play and that role shapes a person’s attitudes and behaviours
the ‘prison’ environment was an important factor in creating the guard’s brutal behaviour
What are the possitives of zimbardo’s experiment?
high levels of control on selection of ps = ruled out induvidual personality differences affecting the results
90% of prisoners conversations were about prison life = high internal validity
What are the issues with zimbardo’s study?
ps were play-acting rather than conforming = acting based on stereotypes and characters from films
may have exaggerated the power of the situation to influence behaviour = only 1/3 of guards were harsh, 1/3 were helping the prisoners
replications found different results - prisoners took more control
unethical - humiliation, distress,
zimbardo played the cheif = bias and unethical
What is obedience?
the result of social influence where somebody acts in response to a direct order from an authority figure
What is situational attribution?
inferring that a person’s behaviour is caused by something about the situation they are in
What is dispositional attribution?
inferring that the reason for a person’s behvaiour is something aboutn themselves such as their personality
What was the aim of milgram’s study?
to find out whether people would obey an unjust order from a person who is an authority figure and to see if situational or dispositional factors led the person to obey
What was the procedure of Milgram’s study?
40 male volunteers each paid $4.50
decieved into thinking they were giving electric shocks - they were told that the epxt. concerned the role of punishment in learning
ps had a teacher role and confed was the learner who had to memorise words
the teacher (p) would administer a shock when the learner was incorrect - went up to 450Volts
the researcher would use prods to make the p continue giving shocks
What did milgram find?
all ps went to 300Vs
65% went to 450v
most ps were stressed and wanted to stop and showed some signs of extreme anxiety
what did milgram conclude?
under certain circumstances, most people will obey orders that go against their conscienece and it is caused by situational factors
What were all the variations of milgrams study?
venue moved to derelict building
teacher and learner in same room
teacher had to force learner’s hand onto electric plate
two other ‘teachers’ (confeds) who refused to continue
teacher paired with confed assistant
experimenter on the phone
What was the obedience rate of the venue moving variation?
47.5%
What was the obedience rate of the teacher and learner in same room variation?
40%
What was the obedience rate of the teacher forcing learners hand on electric plate variation?
30%
What was the obedience rate of the there was two other teachers variation?
10%
What was the obedience rate of the teacher has assistant variation?
92.5%
What was the obedience rate of the experimenter oon the phone variation?
20.5%
What is the good thing about milgrams study?
the findings have been replicated in a french documentary
What are the issues with milgram’s study?
lacks internal validity - ps may not have believed that they were giving electric shocks, pretending to obey
lacks ecological validity - artificial, doesnt reflect real life obedience
lacks population validity - american, ethnocentric
unethical - harm, deception, informed consent, withdrawal
volunteer sample - may have gathered a certain group of people