Social Development In Early Adulthood And Love And Marraige Flashcards
Erikson’s theory in adolescence
When people start to hopefully find themselves and who they are supposed to be
Erikson’s theory in early adulthood
◦ Early adulthood
◦ One or both of you should change. Not necessarily for the bad, but you both should be becoming more and developing.
• Intimacy
◦ Sometimes you may not find the right person for you until you find yourself and who you should be.
• Isolation
◦ You may be married and have a partner, but still feel alone. Either because you are not sharing your true self, or your partner is not sharing their true self.
Erikson’s theory in middle adulthood
◦ Middle adulthood
• When people are more likely to have a mid life crisis, and this is especially the case, maybe even worse when you experience isolation in early adulthood
Marriage trend in average age
• average age has been increasing
◦ In 2013 it was 27 for women and 29 for men
‣ Generally by now the brains are fully developed, and most people are fully there in themselves
Fitting marriage trends with Erickson’s theory
◦ Ages of 28 and 32 have the lowest risk of divorce in the first 5 years
Marriage trends in marriage equality
• Marriage equality
◦ We start to see more some sex couples, recently the data looks the same as the data for heterosexual marriages did
‣ In-laws, money, families are the largest stressors
People who never marry
• never marrying
◦ Stigma decreasing (no longer spinsters at 23)
‣ The term spinsters referred to; what seemed to be healthy, when can have kids, but the biggest part was from a legal process to be declared a spinster was sometimes good legally. At this time women could not have their own bank account, line of credit, check book, their husbands needed to do this.
• Becoming a “spinster” allowed you that if you are a unmarried women and have no living male relatives you can; own your own property, do your own banking, etc.
• This term could also be demeaning
◦ Still there for some
Deciding to marry - arranged marriages
• arranged marriages
◦ Throughout history most have been arranged, and not because of love. This theory in some ways of marrying out of love is still relatively new
◦ Sometimes the marriage is simply because of financial benefit. May be who a royal marries that will help the royal family the most.
‣ Arranged marriages are more likely to last
Deciding to marry - romantic love marriages
- these have always been here just not as prominent as now◦ Always popular in stories and songs
‣ Was often what people wanted, but they often ended in arranged marriages
◦ Not common until after the Industrial Revolution
‣ It wasn’t until know that we started seeing widespread romantic marriages
◦ People with very high levels of romantic attitudes have low levels of marital satisfaction
‣ People with high levels of romanticism or love tend to be less happy
What must the relationship be to last
= the relationship must be perceived as equal/balanced in order to last
- unhappiness comes form imbalanced relationships
Mate poaching
- when someone tries to take a boyfriend or girlfriend from you
- often because they think your significant other looks better and has a better personality that would be good for themself
Predicting marriage patterns (mate selection) -> matching hypothesis
◦ Matching hypothesis -> more the economists that think this
‣ Attractiveness
• Typically in marriages the two people are very similar in level of attraction
‣ Mate poachers
Predicting marriage patterns (mate selection) -> equity theory
◦ Equity theory -> moves into social and psychosocial psych
‣ Social psychological theory
‣ Equal rewards and costs
• That one may be good at something an the other person something else. The equality in the relationship, no not battling for the same things
‣ Wider view of assets
Sternberg’s theory
• passion -> hot, lust
◦ Men a yes/no switch, women a dimmer
◦ Can you actually imagine being with that person in a good way
• Intimacy -> warm, liking
◦ Do you actually like them? Can you really share an trust that person?
◦ The you trust them, care about them, want to be with them
• Commitment -> cold, decision to stay together
◦ Have you both made the admission to stay together. have you publicly made the decision to stay together for life
Sternberg’s theory -> the “love” patterns
- non-love
◦ Before you actually have any of the components, is the pretend love