SOC200 - Qualitative Interviewing + Data Analysis (Chapter 11 + 13) Flashcards
Qualitative Interviewing
generally less structured: Survey interviews rigid set of standardized questions
questions are almost always open-ended
Qualitative Interviewing
Never know where you end up Structure in depth interview General interest – guide conversation Pursue issues in greater depth Explore unanticipated issues More powerful when used properly
Qualitative Interviewing
many of us already employ qualitative interviewing
qualitative interviewing is transformed from casual form of interaction, to a scientific tool
Interviewer has a general plan of inquiry but not a rigid set of questions that must be asked in particular words + order
Key Issues Related to Qualitative Interviewing
Degree of direction + structure from interviewer can vary depending on the research topic
Answers elicited by initial questions should shape following ones
Respondent’s line of discussion should never be halted or cut off, but subtly redirected back to your main concern
Key Issues Related to Qualitative Interviewing
Never halt – they will shut down and withdraw
need to be especially adept in following with questions that
Provide more detail on what respondent just said + redirects respondent back to the main concern
Key Issues Related to Qualitative Interviewing
Listening to what the respondent is saying, Interpreting his/her meaning, affects your next question
Using these skills almost simultaneously
Key Issues Related to Qualitative Interviewing
Rigid set can trip you up
Focus on negating own ego
Socially acceptable incompetent: might think you know what they’re saying, but you are actively engaging in question to find out what these experiences mean to them
Key Issues Related to Qualitative Interviewing
reviewing your interview records: prepare for subsequent interviews by: Identifying effective questions + questions you missed
Key Issues Related to Qualitative Interviewing
wording + tone used during your interviewing
How you responded to what was said + what you “should
have” followed up on
Identifying areas where you assumed the respondent’s meaning instead of asking for clarity
- In-Depth Interview Studies
qualitative interviews primary means of data gathering
Very effective for enabling researchers to access voices from “subordinated” groups in society
- In-Depth Interview Studies
More efficient data collection method than field observation
still allows issues + perceptions to emerge that would not come out of structured survey interviews
- In-Depth Interview Studies
What it means to them – asking the person is more valid than participating
What it means to them as opposed to what it means to you
- In-Depth Interview Studies
Limited by time consumption, hard to obtain, require great deal of cooperation from subjects
Too much to do large probablity samples, small non-probability samples are usually the main option
Good with exploratory studies
- In-Depth Interview Studies
limitations common among data collected through nonprobability sampling techniques
Data can often be used to develop future survey questions
Focus Groups
6-10 people brought together to discuss issue
discussion is almost always navigated by moderator
data generated via group interaction
popular in non-academic research (consumer, market, + political research)
Focus Groups
Depends on topic - # of ppl
Moderator: control conversation, probes, lets everyone talk, Keep them focused
Focus Groups
Interpret quantitative analysis like a survey
Designing questionnaires for stats can
Exploratory – small group, get info for bigger research project
Focus Groups
Only more recently have focus groups gained popularity in non-academic research
useful for helping researchers to interpret results of a quantitative analysis (like a survey)
testing the appropriateness of survey questions
Conducting Focus Groups
no more than 12 people
10-15, until you hit “saturation point” of responses - similar patterns and issues, themes
expect perspectives on topic to vary widely, then more groups may be necessary
Conducting Focus Groups
Stratification of groups may be necessary
If you know diff betw demographic groups – age groups, males/females
Participants for whom the topic is relevant only selected for focus groups
Conducting Focus Groups
Led by a Trained Moderator – keep the discussion on track, ensure everyone has a chance to speak + prevent anyone from dominating the exchange
Informal Environment – participants exchange with each other rather than with moderator