SOC200 - Logic of Sampling (Chapter 6) Flashcards
Sample
selection of observations from a pop
Population
all possible data values that could be observed
Sampling
process of selecting observations from target pop
NONPROBABILITY SAMPLING
Selecting observations in way that doesn’t ensure results generalizable to target pop
•if members of pop don’t have an equal chance to be selected - can’t be sure that it represents whole pop
•complex social phenomena
NONPROBABILITY SAMPLING
Used in situations where it virtually impossible/unnecessary to ensure generalizability of results
hard to find people or groups with unique conditions
Homeless, Deviant cases: not usual cases, unique to the norm (gay military), Complex social phenomena: (initiation into a frat, cult)
APPROACHES to NON- PROBABILITY SAMPLING:
1. Relying on Available Subjects
Sample limited to available subjects.
Good for pretesting questionnaire/providing info for pilot study
APPROACHES to NON- PROBABILITY SAMPLING:
1. Relying on Available Subjects
Undergraduate students common source of data for this sampling approach
FIVE MAIN APPROACHES to NON- PROBABILITY SAMPLING: 2. Purposive Sampling
Selecting sample based on own knowledge of sample + purposes of study.
widely used for studying deviant cases to improve understanding of general pattern (Gays in the military, Male midwives)
zeroing in deviation, selecting samples based on what you want to study
FIVE MAIN APPROACHES to NON- PROBABILITY SAMPLING: 3. Snowball Sampling
network based - researcher interviews few members of target pop + asks to be referred to other members of they know
Good for locating members of unique possibly marginal pop
•might be easier to do this than having a blanket survey
•Used primarily for exploratory purposes
FIVE MAIN APPROACHES to NON-
PROBABILITY SAMPLING: 4. Quota Sampling
methodical - knowing the demographic breakdown of target pop (52% female)
select people fitting this combo of characteristics (quota frame)
•stratify pop based on demographic breakdown
FIVE MAIN APPROACHES to NON-
PROBABILITY SAMPLING: 4. Quota Sampling
E.g. If you decide to interview 100 people in Toronto, then you should have 52 females in your sample
•problem when demographic breakdown is not accurate (not up to date)
FIVE MAIN APPROACHES to NON-
PROBABILITY SAMPLING: 4. Quota Sampling
Good when time + sampling budgets limited/high level of accuracy is not needed
•Selection of sample elements within given cell may be biased even though proportion of population is accurately estimated
FIVE MAIN APPROACHES to NON- PROBABILITY SAMPLING: 5. Informers
Collaborating with member “inside” group want to study
Beware of reliability + validity of the info: can’t randomly select, often don’t have a choice, only someone who is willing to give you that info
•there might be something about that informer that make them unreliable - filter everything they tell you, often marginalized by group, biased view/maybe unhonest, cencorsed view
Major Limitation of Non-Probability Samples
- assuming relationship beyond what sample can support
- not necessarily giving everyone a chance to get selected
- while some may be necessary, reliability + generalizability issues - can’t claim they represent characteristics of pop
- exploratory
- puposive +snowball would be valid because they focus on target pop
PROBABILITY SAMPLING
•Aim: provide reliable + valid description of pop
equal chance – better probability of generalizable results
•by collecting observations with method that ensures sample data have same variations + consistent characteristics in pop data