SOC200 - Ethics (Chapter 3) Flashcards
Ethics
research ethics not confined to any particular stage in research process diagram
ethical considerations supposed to be inherent in all steps
not manditory to be valid
follow certain ethical protocol – to be accepted by other scientists
Defining Ethical Research
principle of ethics in research: whether you are being moral in decisions you make about your collection, analysis, and reporting of data
involves balancing benefit of knowledge against benefit of being “moral” in acquisition of that knowledge
Defining Ethical Research
notions of morality are variable (change with time, culture, ideologies, generations, individuals), no absolute definition of what ethical research is
common accepted criteria
contextuality of “morally acceptable” behaviour
notions of morality variable: contextuality over time + geography
morals do evolve over time
ethics is relative – cultures have diff definitions
General Agreement about what “Ethical Research” is
Despite lack of universally accepted definition, research currently agrees that ethically conducted research strives towards:
Voluntary Participation
nobody should be forced to participate against their will, even if results of forced participation could benefit all of humanity
even if there are no risks/with benefits
Field Research: often observing without them knowing so they don’t modify behaviour - No consent
Prisoners: might feel they benefit if they participate – have to make it clear – no diff in treatment
No Harm to Subjects
all forms of harm, mental/physical
sometimes not always obvious at first
Personal distress – guilt
Informed consent: made fully aware of risks – might affect results – more prepared
What makes ppl happy in marriage – ppl started divorcing
No Harm to Subjects
Emotional/psychological distress: temporary/chronic
participant facing an aspect of themselves they are uncomfortable with (confronted by fear of public speaking, phobia of spiders, being cruel to others)
Anonymity
neither researchers nor readers can identify given response within respondent
diff to maintain, more stringent if doing interviews
Code is protected legally – researchers, lawyers, journalists
Anonymity
often achieved through surveys that can be returned without any identification number (through mail or internet
Confidentiality
lower standard of protecting participant’s identity researcher can identify person’s responses but promises not to do so publicly
important when researching sensitive subjects
No Deception
researcher should not misidentify themself and/or purpose of research without compelling scientific/administrative concerns
debriefing: nature of research, make sure they are ok + correct any problems – get back to previous state (therapy)
Maybe something they don’t feel immediately/debriefing may not be able to fix
No Deception
Difficult to do in practice when validity of the research may depend on deception
If deception is unavoidable, researchers may often use a technique known as debriefing
Analysis and Reporting
means being honest + open about shortcomings of study (quality of measures, data collected, ways of interpreting findings, + limiting study to aspects that you can be open + honest about
Analysis and Reporting
Often difficult to do in “Publish/Perish” setting of academia
because limitations may be known later
Researchers often compelled to manipulate so they get result that’s interesting