SOC200 - Ethics (Chapter 3) Flashcards

1
Q

Ethics

A

research ethics not confined to any particular stage in research process diagram
ethical considerations supposed to be inherent in all steps
not manditory to be valid
follow certain ethical protocol – to be accepted by other scientists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Defining Ethical Research

A

principle of ethics in research: whether you are being moral in decisions you make about your collection, analysis, and reporting of data
involves balancing benefit of knowledge against benefit of being “moral” in acquisition of that knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Defining Ethical Research

A

notions of morality are variable (change with time, culture, ideologies, generations, individuals), no absolute definition of what ethical research is
common accepted criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

contextuality of “morally acceptable” behaviour

A

notions of morality variable: contextuality over time + geography
morals do evolve over time
ethics is relative – cultures have diff definitions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

General Agreement about what “Ethical Research” is

A

Despite lack of universally accepted definition, research currently agrees that ethically conducted research strives towards:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Voluntary Participation

A

nobody should be forced to participate against their will, even if results of forced participation could benefit all of humanity
even if there are no risks/with benefits
Field Research: often observing without them knowing so they don’t modify behaviour - No consent
Prisoners: might feel they benefit if they participate – have to make it clear – no diff in treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

No Harm to Subjects

A

all forms of harm, mental/physical
sometimes not always obvious at first
Personal distress – guilt
Informed consent: made fully aware of risks – might affect results – more prepared
What makes ppl happy in marriage – ppl started divorcing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

No Harm to Subjects

A

Emotional/psychological distress: temporary/chronic
participant facing an aspect of themselves they are uncomfortable with (confronted by fear of public speaking, phobia of spiders, being cruel to others)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Anonymity

A

neither researchers nor readers can identify given response within respondent
diff to maintain, more stringent if doing interviews
Code is protected legally – researchers, lawyers, journalists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Anonymity

A

often achieved through surveys that can be returned without any identification number (through mail or internet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Confidentiality

A

lower standard of protecting participant’s identity researcher can identify person’s responses but promises not to do so publicly
important when researching sensitive subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

No Deception

A

researcher should not misidentify themself and/or purpose of research without compelling scientific/administrative concerns
debriefing: nature of research, make sure they are ok + correct any problems – get back to previous state (therapy)
Maybe something they don’t feel immediately/debriefing may not be able to fix

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

No Deception

A

Difficult to do in practice when validity of the research may depend on deception
If deception is unavoidable, researchers may often use a technique known as debriefing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Analysis and Reporting

A

means being honest + open about shortcomings of study (quality of measures, data collected, ways of interpreting findings, + limiting study to aspects that you can be open + honest about

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Analysis and Reporting

A

Often difficult to do in “Publish/Perish” setting of academia
because limitations may be known later
Researchers often compelled to manipulate so they get result that’s interesting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Origin of Ethical Research Guidelines in Canada

A

In 1994, 3 major granting bodies in Canada formed working group to create standard of ethics for doing research:
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)

17
Q

Origin of Ethical Research Guidelines in Canada

A

Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS) (pg 65-67)
2nd edition of standard was published in 2010. To receive funding, researchers + their institutions must follow principles in this statement

18
Q

Origins of Ethics Standards in Research

A

Has to submit application to tri-council: how they meet + exceed standards for ethical research
motives for developing formal ethics procedures in research stem largely from a history of medical research that would now be considered unethical and illegal

19
Q

Origins of Ethics Standards in Research

A

However, the scale and extremeness of medical experiments by Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan that were discovered after their defeat in 1945 pushed the issue of ethics standards in medical research to the forefront

20
Q

Origins of Ethics Standards in Research

A

formalized through document inspired by allied trial of Nazi Doctors in 1947, outlining what constitutes legitimate medical research (The Nuremburg Code), succeeded in 1974 by Declaration of Helsinki
Absence of coersion, consent, properly formalized, treat them nicely

21
Q

What were Doctors in these Axis Countries Doing during WWII?

A

Experiments conducted by SS Doctors in Nazi Germany

Subjects: Jews of all ages, Roma, Soviet POWs + disabled non-Jewish Germans sent to concentration camps

22
Q

What were Doctors in these Axis Countries Doing during WWII?

A

experiments on twins
bone, muscle, and nerve transplantation experiments ▫ head injury experiments
freezing and hypothermia experiments
malaria, mustard gas, and gangrene experiments

23
Q

Experiments conducted by Doctors for Imperial Japan

A

Unit 731 based in Harbin in Northeast (Japanese Occupied) China
Subjects: Chinese, Russian, SE Asian Pacific Islanders, Allied POWs
Vivisection without anaesthesia

24
Q

Experiments conducted by Doctors for Imperial Japan

A

Injections with diseases, disguised as vaccinations
Weapons testing
US General MacArthur secretly granted immunity to physicians of Unit 731 in exchange for providing America

25
Q

EXAMPLES OF UNETHICAL RESEARCH IN POST WWII NORTH AMERICA

A

Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (1932-1972) run by US Public Health Service
Studied natural progression of syphilis among black men
were never told they had syphilis, nor were they treated
for it even after effective cure was developed in 1947
Deliberately withheld treatment for syphilis to see its degradation effects

26
Q

Project MkUltra

A

mind control experiments conducted by CIA
Administered mind altering substances (LSD) + used other brainwashing techniques to unsuspecting but vulnerable populations of US + Canadian Citizens

27
Q

Project MkUltra

A

program recruited former Nazi scientists, some of whom studied torture + brainwashing + several who had been identified + prosecuted as war criminals during Nuremberg Trials
Project imported to Montreal Psychiatric Hospital by Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron
Ppl killed themselves because they thought they were going crazy

28
Q

Canadian Nutrition Experiments Using Malnourished Native Children

A

Aboriginal children in residential schools in Canada who were already malnourished, were deliberately starved for years

29
Q

Canadian Nutrition Experiments Using Malnourished Native Children

A

Instead of recommending increase in support researchers decided that isolated, dependent, hungry ppl would be ideal subjects for tests on effects of different diets
Not much was learned from these studies

30
Q

Popular Social Science Examples

A

Philip Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment: some prisoners, some guards – out of hand
Stanley Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority figures: obedience, ppl willing to do bad stuff if they were not shouldering blame
Laud Humphreys’ Tearoom trade: analysis of anonymous homosexual acts taking place in public toilets: got their license plate, pretended to be a voyeur, blackmailed

31
Q

Popular Social Science Examples

A

Scheper-Hughes: covert ethnography of an international underground organs market connecting third-world organ sellers to New York, New Jersey + Israel
undercover buyers

32
Q

Ethical Issues related to Research Design (Chapter 4)

A

Mostly centres around observation methods involving direct interaction with participants: Issues concerning voluntary participation + consent, Need for a consent form, Need to inform participants about goals of study
A lot times researchers cut corners
Can come back to haunt them if they don’t think through it

33
Q

Ethical Issues related to Research Design (Chapter 4)

A

Consent from parents if participants are minors
Right to privacy, dignity, protection against harm
How will confidentiality be maintained?
All of these factors must be balanced against researcher’s desire for data

34
Q

Ethical Issues in Sampling (Chapter 6)

A

Many of ethics surrounding sampling parallel issue of ethics in data collection:
For non-probability sampling (snowball, convenience samples, purposive samples):
Main ethical issues concern how to deal with vulnerable populations (deception, voluntary participation, no harm to subjects, confidentiality)

35
Q

Ethical Issues in Sampling (Chapter 6)

A

For probability sampling: additional issue of being academically truthful about integrity of your probability sample for purposes of generalizability
ppl are from/reporting on vulnerable – show a lot of concern about dignity, confidentiality, anonymity
Probability: truthful about integrity, are they generalizable