Selman C&D Flashcards

1
Q

Social cognition

A

describes the mental processes we make use of when engaged in social interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Perspective-taking

A

our ability to appreciate a social situation from the perspective of other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Social perspective-taking

A

concerns what someone else is feeling or thinking i.e. social cognition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Piaget believe in?

A

domain-general cognitive development, so he believed that physical and social perspective-taking would occur simultaneously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Selman say in regards to Piaget?

A

social perspective-taking is a separate process, a domain-specific approach to explaining cognitive development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Selman’s perspective-taking research

A

looked at changes that happened with age in children’s responses to scenarios where they were asked to take the role of different people in a social situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Selman’s procedure

holly

A
  • 30 boys, 30 girls
  • 20 4 year olds, 20 5 year olds, 20 6 year olds
  • Individually received task designed to ensure perspective-taking ability
  • Involved asking how each person felt in various scenarios
  • Eg a scenario with a child named Holly, who promised her father that she would never climb trees but then she sees her friend whose kitten is stuck up a tree
  • The task was to describe and explain how each person would feel if Holly did or didn’t climb the tree
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Selman’s findings

A
  • Number of distinct levels of perspective-taking were identified
  • The level of perspective-taking correlated with age
  • Clear developmental sequence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

stage 0

A

age 3-6, egocentric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

stage 1

A

age 6-8, social-informational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

stage 2

A

8-10, self-reflective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

stage 3

A

10-12, mutual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

stage 4

A

12+, social and conventional system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

egocentric

A

Can’t reliably distinguish between their own emotions and others emotions, generally identify emotional states in others, do not understand what social behaviour may have caused them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

social-informational

A

Can tell the difference between their own POV and that of others, can usually focus on only one of these perspectives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

self-reflective

A

Child can put themselves in position of another person fully, appreciates others perspective, can only take on board one POV at a time

17
Q

Mutual

A

Able to look at a situation from their own POV and others at the same time

18
Q

Social and conventional system

A

Able to see that sometimes understanding others views is not enough to allow people to reach agreement, hence why social conventions are needed to keep order

19
Q

Selman recognised that this does not fully explain social development and there are also 3 aspects to social development (Schultz et al):

A
  1. Interpersonal understanding
  2. Interpersonal negotiation strategies
  3. Awareness of personal meaning of relationships
20
Q

Interpersonal understanding

A

what was measured in the earlier perspective-taking task, if we can take different roles then we can understand social situations

21
Q

Interpersonal negotiation strategies

A

as well as understanding what others think we need to develop skills in how to respond to them, develop social skills such as asserting out position and managing conflict

22
Q

Awareness of personal meaning of relationships

A

requires ability to reflect on social behaviour in the context of different relationships, eg a violent gang member may have an advanced social understanding and good social skills but chooses a simple approach of conflict because of their role in the gang
…..

23
Q

Research support for stages -
Evidence that perspective-taking becomes more advanced with age

strength

A
  • Selman tested 60 children (both genders aged 4-6) using scenarios like Holly and the kitten
  • Found significant positive correlations between age and the ability to take different perspectives
  • Cross-sectional research been supported by longitudinal studies eg Gurucharri and Selman
  • Longitudinal studies have good validity as they control for individual differences where cross-sectional studies dont
    Solid support from different lines of research
24
Q

Too cognitive -
Focuses only on cognitive factors

limitation

A
  • More to social development than increasing their cognitive abilities
  • Selmans approach fails to take into account a range of other factors that impacts children’s social development
  • Internal factors include the development of empathy and emotional self-regulation
  • External factors include parenting style, family climate
    Too narrow of an approach
25
Q

Research support for perspective-taking -
Important for healthy social development

strength

A
  • Buijzen and Valkenburg observation of child-parent interaction in toy shops and food shops
  • Interactions where parents refused to buy child something they wanted
  • Noted any coercive behaviour in the children
  • Example of unhealthy social behaviour
  • Found negative correlations between coercive behaviour and both age and perspective-taking ability
    There is a relationship between perspective-taking abilities and healthy social behaviour
26
Q

counterpoint to Research support for perspective-taking

limitation

A
  • Other research has not been supportive
  • Gasser and Keller assessed perspective taking in bullies, victims and non-participants
  • Found that bullies displayed no difficulties in perspective-taking
    It may not be a key element in healthy social development
27
Q

RWA

strength

A
  • In schools, teaching young children to appreciate someone’s point of view
  • Social skills training for adults with learning disabilities to help people learn to how communicate
  • With offenders, working with prisoners to develop their empathetic and pro-social behaviour when they are released
    Real world value