scientific thinking final: part 2 Flashcards
what is psychology
psychology is the scientific study of the mind,brain, and behaviour
how do we explain behaviour ?
ways of knowing :
-scientific methods
-unseientific (non-data-driven methods)
unsientific methods
-folk wisdom
-common sense
-authority
-intuition
critical thinking
the ABILITY and willigness to evaluate the truth and/or completion of one’s knowdge, to SEEK EVIDENCE before declaring something truth, to EVALUATE that evidence before accepting or rejecting
why do we use quantitive reserch method in psychology?
it gives us a common languague and a took to guide and ecorage critical thinking
scientific skepticism
1.keep an open mind to all claims
2.accept only claims that have been tested
3.re-evaluate claims when presented with new evidence
Not accepting something as true unthinkingly, but rather seeking out and evaluating the relevant evidence to shape our beliefs about what might be true.
!3 keys characteristics of science
- systemetic empiricism
-rely on obiservation
-reserch methods offer this structure
2.Production of public knowledge
-peer review
-replication
3.serch to solve problems
4 other characteristics of science
universalism, communism,
disin- terestedness,
organized skepticism
if things canot be observed (universalism)
then it can not be used the scientific methods
ex:if ferries exist
universalism
scientific observations are systematic and structured, and evaluated objectivily using accepted methods
communality
-transparently reported
-full disclosed data,results,methods
-same results once duplicated
2 types of replications
-exact replication
-conceptual replication
exact replication
replication that is made exaclty a like the first time(ex:same questions,similar circustances)
conceptual replication
the concept is the same of a study but everthing is not exacly the same thing as the first time (ex:different scenerions/questions )
run study > submit for publication > peer review > run study…
peer-review
-at a jornal
-anonymus reviewer
-expersts comment on reserch
edditors make decisions
decisions
-accept paper(pretty rare)
-revise and resubimit
-reject
existing knowledge > unanswered question > conduct reserch>more evidence>publish communicate>existing knowledge…
Disinterestedness
Science should should be done for the sake of science, rather than self-interest or power. Merton says that
Organized Skepticism
science should be critical of work even if supports their idea
-peer review
science relies on
empirical observation
theories/hypothasis must be testable
falsifiable
what is pseudo-science
claims that sound scientific but arent backed up with actuall eveidence or a very week one often used to sell a product.services or therapies
example
dating app that claims that will find you love by using methods formulated by psychologists
how do you identify pseudoscience?
-exagerated claims without strong evidence
-overrealince on anacdotal evidence
-psychobabble-sounds scientific
-claims of scientif proof but no link to actual reserch
-absence of adquant peer review
-lack of self-correlation
-unfalsifiable claims
falsifibility
the possability that a claim can be proven to be false by an observation or experiment
ex:people who excercise have better grades
unfasifiable claim
a claim that can not be proven false
ex: mairmaids exists, u didnt find them cause they only appear if you look away